-
A Survey on Annotations in Information Visualization: Empirical Insights, Applications, and Challenges
Authors:
Md Dilshadur Rahman,
Bhavana Doppalapudi,
Ghulam Jilani Quadri,
Paul Rosen
Abstract:
We present a comprehensive survey on the use of annotations in information visualizations, highlighting their crucial role in improving audience understanding and engagement with visual data. Our investigation encompasses empirical studies on annotations, showcasing their impact on user engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability across various contexts. We also study the existing too…
▽ More
We present a comprehensive survey on the use of annotations in information visualizations, highlighting their crucial role in improving audience understanding and engagement with visual data. Our investigation encompasses empirical studies on annotations, showcasing their impact on user engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability across various contexts. We also study the existing tools and techniques for creating annotations and their diverse applications, enhancing the understanding of both practical and theoretical aspects of annotations in data visualization. Additionally, we identify existing research gaps and propose potential future research directions, making our survey a valuable resource for researchers, visualization designers, and practitioners by providing a thorough understanding of the application of annotations in visualization.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Seeing is Believing: The Role of Scatterplots in Recommender System Trust and Decision-Making
Authors:
Bhavana Doppalapudi,
Md Dilshadur Rahman,
Paul Rosen
Abstract:
The accuracy of recommender systems influences their trust and decision-making when using them. Providing additional information, such as visualizations, offers context that would otherwise be lacking. However, the role of visualizations in influencing trust and decisions with recommender systems is under-explored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a two-part human-subject experiment to investigate…
▽ More
The accuracy of recommender systems influences their trust and decision-making when using them. Providing additional information, such as visualizations, offers context that would otherwise be lacking. However, the role of visualizations in influencing trust and decisions with recommender systems is under-explored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a two-part human-subject experiment to investigate the impact of scatterplots on recommender system decisions. Our first study focuses on high-level decisions, such as selecting which recommender system to use. The second study focuses on low-level decisions, such as agreeing or disagreeing with a specific recommendation. Our results show scatterplots accompanied by higher levels of accuracy influence decisions and that participants tended to trust the recommendations more when scatterplots were accompanied by descriptive accuracy (e.g., \textit{high}, \textit{medium}, or \textit{low}) instead of numeric accuracy (e.g., \textit{90\%}). Furthermore, we observed scatterplots often assisted participants in validating their decisions. Based on the results, we believe that scatterplots and visualizations, in general, can aid in making informed decisions, validating decisions, and building trust in recommendation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Striking the Right Balance: Systematic Assessment of Evaluation Method Distribution Across Contribution Types
Authors:
Feng Lin,
Arran Zeyu Wang,
Md Dilshadur Rahman,
Danielle Albers Szafir,
Ghulam Jilani Quadri
Abstract:
In the rapidly evolving field of information visualization, rigorous evaluation is essential for validating new techniques, understanding user interactions, and demonstrating the effectiveness and usability of visualizations. Faithful evaluations provide valuable insights into how users interact with and perceive the system, enabling designers to identify potential weaknesses and make informed dec…
▽ More
In the rapidly evolving field of information visualization, rigorous evaluation is essential for validating new techniques, understanding user interactions, and demonstrating the effectiveness and usability of visualizations. Faithful evaluations provide valuable insights into how users interact with and perceive the system, enabling designers to identify potential weaknesses and make informed decisions about design choices and improvements. However, an emerging trend of multiple evaluations within a single research raises critical questions about the sustainability, feasibility, and methodological rigor of such an approach. New researchers and students, influenced by this trend, may believe -- multiple evaluations are necessary for a study, regardless of the contribution types. However, the number of evaluations in a study should depend on its contributions and merits, not on the trend of including multiple evaluations to strengthen a paper. So, how many evaluations are enough? This is a situational question and cannot be formulaically determined. Our objective is to summarize current trends and patterns to assess the distribution of evaluation methods over different paper contribution types. In this paper, we identify this trend through a non-exhaustive literature survey of evaluation patterns in 214 papers in the two most recent years' VIS issues in IEEE TVCG from 2023 and 2024. We then discuss various evaluation strategy patterns in the information visualization field to guide practical choices and how this paper will open avenues for further discussion.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Enhancing Student Feedback Using Predictive Models in Visual Literacy Courses
Authors:
Alon Friedman,
Kevin Hawley,
Paul Rosen,
Md Dilshadur Rahman
Abstract:
Peer review is a popular feedback mechanism in higher education that actively engages students and provides researchers with a means to assess student engagement. However, there is little empirical support for the durability of peer review, particularly when using data predictive modeling to analyze student comments. This study uses Naïve Bayes modeling to analyze peer review data obtained from an…
▽ More
Peer review is a popular feedback mechanism in higher education that actively engages students and provides researchers with a means to assess student engagement. However, there is little empirical support for the durability of peer review, particularly when using data predictive modeling to analyze student comments. This study uses Naïve Bayes modeling to analyze peer review data obtained from an undergraduate visual literacy course over five years. We expand on the research of Friedman and Rosen and Beasley et al. by focusing on the Naïve Bayes model of students' remarks. Our findings highlight the utility of Naïve Bayes modeling, particularly in the analysis of student comments based on parts of speech, where nouns emerged as the prominent category. Additionally, when examining students' comments using the visual peer review rubric, the lie factor emerged as the predominant factor. Comparing Naïve Bayes model to Beasley's approach, we found both help instructors map directions taken in the class, but the Naïve Bayes model provides a more specific outline for forecasting with a more detailed framework for identifying core topics within the course, enhancing the forecasting of educational directions. Through the application of the Holdout Method and $\mathrm{k}$-fold cross-validation with continuity correction, we have validated the model's predictive accuracy, underscoring its effectiveness in offering deep insights into peer review mechanisms. Our study findings suggest that using predictive modeling to assess student comments can provide a new way to better serve the students' classroom comments on their visual peer work. This can benefit courses by inspiring changes to course content, reinforcement of course content, modification of projects, or modifications to the rubric itself.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design Space
Authors:
Md Dilshadur Rahman,
Ghulam Jilani Quadri,
Bhavana Doppalapudi,
Danielle Albers Szafir,
Paul Rosen
Abstract:
Annotations play a vital role in highlighting critical aspects of visualizations, aiding in data externalization and exploration, collaborative sensemaking, and visual storytelling. However, despite their widespread use, we identified a lack of a design space for common practices for annotations. In this paper, we evaluated over 1,800 static annotated charts to understand how people annotate visua…
▽ More
Annotations play a vital role in highlighting critical aspects of visualizations, aiding in data externalization and exploration, collaborative sensemaking, and visual storytelling. However, despite their widespread use, we identified a lack of a design space for common practices for annotations. In this paper, we evaluated over 1,800 static annotated charts to understand how people annotate visualizations in practice. Through qualitative coding of these diverse real-world annotated charts, we explored three primary aspects of annotation usage patterns: analytic purposes for chart annotations (e.g., present, identify, summarize, or compare data features), mechanisms for chart annotations (e.g., types and combinations of annotations used, frequency of different annotation types across chart types, etc.), and the data source used to generate the annotations. We then synthesized our findings into a design space of annotations, highlighting key design choices for chart annotations. We presented three case studies illustrating our design space as a practical framework for chart annotations to enhance the communication of visualization insights. All supplemental materials are available at {https://shorturl.at/bAGM1}.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2024; v1 submitted 9 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
