-
Quantifying Media Influence on Covid-19 Mask-Wearing Beliefs
Authors:
Nicholas Rabb,
Nitya Nadgir,
Jan P. de Ruiter,
Lenore Cowen
Abstract:
How political beliefs change in accordance with media exposure is a complicated matter. Some studies have been able to demonstrate that groups with different media diets in the aggregate (e.g., U.S. media consumers ingesting partisan news) arrive at different beliefs about policy issues, but proving this from data at a granular level -- at the level of attitudes expressed in news stories -- remain…
▽ More
How political beliefs change in accordance with media exposure is a complicated matter. Some studies have been able to demonstrate that groups with different media diets in the aggregate (e.g., U.S. media consumers ingesting partisan news) arrive at different beliefs about policy issues, but proving this from data at a granular level -- at the level of attitudes expressed in news stories -- remains difficult. In contrast to existing opinion formation models that describe granular detail but are not data-driven, or data-driven studies that rely on simple keyword detection and miss linguistic nuances, being able to identify complicated attitudes in news text and use this data to drive models would enable more nuanced empirical study of opinion formation from media messaging. This study contributes a dataset as well as an analysis that allows the mapping of attitudes from individual news stories to aggregate changes of opinion over time for an important public health topic where opinion differed in the U.S. by partisan media diet: Covid mask-wearing beliefs. By gathering a dataset of U.S. news media stories, from April 6 to June 8, 2020, annotated according to Howard 2020's Face Mask Perception Scale for their statements regarding Covid-19 mask-wearing, we demonstrate fine-grained correlations between media messaging and empirical opinion polling data from a Gallup survey conducted during the same period. We also demonstrate that the data can be used for quantitative analysis of pro- and anti-mask sentiment throughout the period, identifying major events that drove opinion changes. This dataset is made publicly available and can be used by other researchers seeking to evaluate how mask-wearing attitudes were driven by news media content. Additionally, we hope that its general method can be used to enable other media researchers to conduct more detailed analyses of media effects on opinion.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
What is the disinformation problem? Reviewing the dominant paradigm and motivating an alternative sociopolitical view
Authors:
Nicholas Rabb
Abstract:
Disinformation research has proliferated in reaction to widespread false, problematic beliefs purported to explain major social phenomena. Yet while the effects of disinformation are well-known, there is less consensus about its causes; the research spans several disciplines, each focusing on different pieces. This article contributes to this growing field by reviewing prevalent U.S. disinformatio…
▽ More
Disinformation research has proliferated in reaction to widespread false, problematic beliefs purported to explain major social phenomena. Yet while the effects of disinformation are well-known, there is less consensus about its causes; the research spans several disciplines, each focusing on different pieces. This article contributes to this growing field by reviewing prevalent U.S. disinformation discourse (academic writing, media, and corporate and government narrative) and outlining the dominant understanding, or paradigm, of the disinformation problem by analyzing cross-disciplinary discourse about the content, individual, group, and institutional layers of the problem. The result is an individualistic explanation largely blaming social media, malicious individuals or nations, and irrational people. Yet this understanding has shortcomings: notably, that its limited, individualistic views of truth and rationality obscures the influence of oppressive ideologies and media or domestic actors in creating flawed worldviews and spreading disinformation. The article then concludes by putting forth an alternative, sociopolitical paradigm that allows subjective models of the world to govern rationality and information processing -- largely informed by social and group identity -- which are being formed and catered to by institutional actors (corporations, media, political parties, and the government) to maintain or gain legitimacy for their actions.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Beyond case studies: Teaching data science critique and ethics through sociotechnical surveillance studies
Authors:
Nicholas Rabb,
Desen Ozkan
Abstract:
Ethics have become an urgent concern for data science research, practice, and instruction in the wake of growing critique of algorithms and systems showing that they reinforce structural oppression. There has been increasing desire on the part of data science educators to craft curricula that speak to these critiques, yet much ethics education remains individualized, focused on specific cases, or…
▽ More
Ethics have become an urgent concern for data science research, practice, and instruction in the wake of growing critique of algorithms and systems showing that they reinforce structural oppression. There has been increasing desire on the part of data science educators to craft curricula that speak to these critiques, yet much ethics education remains individualized, focused on specific cases, or too abstract and unapplicable. We synthesized some of the most popular critical data science works and designed a data science ethics course that spoke to the social phenomena at the root of critical data studies -- theories of oppression, social systems, power, history, and change -- through analysis of a pressing sociotechnical system: surveillance systems. Through analysis of student reflections and final projects, we determined that at the conclusion of the semester, all students had developed critical analysis skills that allowed them to investigate surveillance systems of their own and identify their benefits, harms, main proponents, those who resist them, and their interplay with social systems, all while considering dimensions of race, class, gender, and more. We argue that this type of instruction -- directly teaching data science ethics alongside social theory -- is a crucial next step for the field.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2024; v1 submitted 3 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Cognitive cascades: How to model (and potentially counter) the spread of fake news
Authors:
Nicholas Rabb,
Lenore Cowen,
Jan P. de Ruiter,
Matthias Scheutz
Abstract:
Understanding the spread of false or dangerous beliefs through a population has never seemed so urgent. Network science researchers have often taken a page from epidemiologists, and modeled the spread of false beliefs as similar to how a disease spreads through a social network. However, absent from those disease-inspired models is an internal model of an individual's set of current beliefs, where…
▽ More
Understanding the spread of false or dangerous beliefs through a population has never seemed so urgent. Network science researchers have often taken a page from epidemiologists, and modeled the spread of false beliefs as similar to how a disease spreads through a social network. However, absent from those disease-inspired models is an internal model of an individual's set of current beliefs, where cognitive science has increasingly documented how the interaction between mental models and incoming messages seems to be crucially important for their adoption or rejection. Some computational social science modelers analyze agent-based models where individuals do have simulated cognition, but they often lack the strengths of network science, namely in empirically-driven network structures. We introduce a cognitive cascade model that combines a network science belief cascade approach with an internal cognitive model of the individual agents as in opinion diffusion models as a public opinion diffusion (POD) model, adding media institutions as agents which begin opinion cascades. We conduct an analysis of the cognitive cascade model with our simple cognitive function across various graph topologies and institutional messaging patterns. We argue from our results that population-level aggregate outcomes of the model qualitatively match what has been reported in COVID-related public opinion polls, and that the model dynamics lend insights as to how to address the spread of problematic beliefs. The overall model sets up a framework with which social science misinformation researchers and computational opinion diffusion modelers can join forces to understand, and hopefully learn how to best counter, the spread of disinformation and "alternative facts."
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2021; v1 submitted 6 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Can You Trust Your Trust Measure?
Authors:
Meia Chita-Tegmark,
Theresa Law,
Nicholas Rabb,
Matthias Scheutz
Abstract:
Trust in human-robot interactions (HRI) is measured in two main ways: through subjective questionnaires and through behavioral tasks. To optimize measurements of trust through questionnaires, the field of HRI faces two challenges: the development of standardized measures that apply to a variety of robots with different capabilities, and the exploration of social and relational dimensions of trust…
▽ More
Trust in human-robot interactions (HRI) is measured in two main ways: through subjective questionnaires and through behavioral tasks. To optimize measurements of trust through questionnaires, the field of HRI faces two challenges: the development of standardized measures that apply to a variety of robots with different capabilities, and the exploration of social and relational dimensions of trust in robots (e.g., benevolence). In this paper we look at how different trust questionnaires fare given these challenges that pull in different directions (being general vs. being exploratory) by studying whether people think the items in these questionnaires are applicable to different kinds of robots and interactions. In Study 1 we show that after being presented with a robot (non-humanoid) and an interaction scenario (fire evacuation), participants rated multiple questionnaire items such as "This robot is principled" as "Non-applicable to robots in general" or "Non-applicable to this robot". In Study 2 we show that the frequency of these ratings change (indeed, even for items rated as N/A to robots in general) when a new scenario is presented (game playing with a humanoid robot). Finally, while overall trust scores remained robust to N/A ratings, our results revealed potential fallacies in the way these scores are commonly interpreted. We conclude with recommendations for the development, use and results-reporting of trust questionnaires for future studies, as well as theoretical implications for the field of HRI.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
