-
Large Language User Interfaces: Voice Interactive User Interfaces powered by LLMs
Authors:
Syed Mekael Wasti,
Ken Q. Pu,
Ali Neshati
Abstract:
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has showcased remarkable capacities for logical reasoning and natural language comprehension. These capabilities can be leveraged in solutions that semantically and textually model complex problems. In this paper, we present our efforts toward constructing a framework that can serve as an intermediary between a user and their user interface (UI), enabl…
▽ More
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has showcased remarkable capacities for logical reasoning and natural language comprehension. These capabilities can be leveraged in solutions that semantically and textually model complex problems. In this paper, we present our efforts toward constructing a framework that can serve as an intermediary between a user and their user interface (UI), enabling dynamic and real-time interactions. We employ a system that stands upon textual semantic mappings of UI components, in the form of annotations. These mappings are stored, parsed, and scaled in a custom data structure, supplementary to an agent-based prompting backend engine. Employing textual semantic mappings allows each component to not only explain its role to the engine but also provide expectations. By comprehending the needs of both the user and the components, our LLM engine can classify the most appropriate application, extract relevant parameters, and subsequently execute precise predictions of the user's expected actions. Such an integration evolves static user interfaces into highly dynamic and adaptable solutions, introducing a new frontier of intelligent and responsive user experiences.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024; v1 submitted 7 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Data Lake Organization
Authors:
Fatemeh Nargesian,
Ken Q. Pu,
Bahar Ghadiri Bashardoost,
Erkang Zhu,
Renée J. Miller
Abstract:
We consider the problem of creating a navigation structure that allows a user to most effectively navigate a data lake. We define an organization as a graph that contains nodes representing sets of attributes within a data lake and edges indicating subset relationships among nodes. We present a new probabilistic model of how users interact with an organization and define the likelihood of a user f…
▽ More
We consider the problem of creating a navigation structure that allows a user to most effectively navigate a data lake. We define an organization as a graph that contains nodes representing sets of attributes within a data lake and edges indicating subset relationships among nodes. We present a new probabilistic model of how users interact with an organization and define the likelihood of a user finding a table using the organization. We propose the data lake organization problem as the problem of finding an organization that maximizes the expected probability of discovering tables by navigating an organization. We propose an approximate algorithm for the data lake organization problem. We show the effectiveness of the algorithm on both real data lakes containing data from open data portals and on benchmarks that emulate the observed characteristics of real data lakes. Through a formal user study, we show that navigation can help users discover relevant tables that cannot be found by keyword search. In addition, in our study, 42% of users preferred the use of navigation and 58% preferred keyword search, suggesting these are complementary and both useful modalities for data discovery in data lakes. Our experiments show that data lake organizations take into account the data lake distribution and outperform an existing hand-curated taxonomy and a common baseline organization.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2020; v1 submitted 17 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
LSH Ensemble: Internet-Scale Domain Search
Authors:
Erkang Zhu,
Fatemeh Nargesian,
Ken Q. Pu,
Renée J. Miller
Abstract:
We study the problem of domain search where a domain is a set of distinct values from an unspecified universe. We use Jaccard set containment, defined as $|Q \cap X|/|Q|$, as the relevance measure of a domain $X$ to a query domain $Q$. Our choice of Jaccard set containment over Jaccard similarity makes our work particularly suitable for searching Open Data and data on the web, as Jaccard similarit…
▽ More
We study the problem of domain search where a domain is a set of distinct values from an unspecified universe. We use Jaccard set containment, defined as $|Q \cap X|/|Q|$, as the relevance measure of a domain $X$ to a query domain $Q$. Our choice of Jaccard set containment over Jaccard similarity makes our work particularly suitable for searching Open Data and data on the web, as Jaccard similarity is known to have poor performance over sets with large differences in their domain sizes. We demonstrate that the domains found in several real-life Open Data and web data repositories show a power-law distribution over their domain sizes.
We present a new index structure, Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) Ensemble, that solves the domain search problem using set containment at Internet scale. Our index structure and search algorithm cope with the data volume and skew by means of data sketches (MinHash) and domain partitioning. Our index structure does not assume a prescribed set of values. We construct a cost model that describes the accuracy of LSH Ensemble with any given partitioning. This allows us to formulate the partitioning for LSH Ensemble as an optimization problem. We prove that there exists an optimal partitioning for any distribution. Furthermore, for datasets following a power-law distribution, as observed in Open Data and Web data corpora, we show that the optimal partitioning can be approximated using equi-depth, making it efficient to use in practice.
We evaluate our algorithm using real data (Canadian Open Data and WDC Web Tables) containing up over 262 M domains. The experiments demonstrate that our index consistently outperforms other leading alternatives in accuracy and performance. The improvements are most dramatic for data with large skew in the domain sizes. Even at 262 M domains, our index sustains query performance with under 3 seconds response time.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2016; v1 submitted 23 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.