-
Nondeterminism makes unary 1-limited automata concise
Authors:
Bruno Guillon,
Luca Prigioniero,
Javad Taheri
Abstract:
We investigate the descriptional complexity of different variants of 1-limited automata (1-las), an extension of two-way finite automata (2nfas) characterizing regular languages. In particular, we consider 2nfas with common-guess (2nfas+cg), which are 2nfas equipped with a new kind of nondeterminism that allows the device to initially annotate each input symbol, before performing a read-only compu…
▽ More
We investigate the descriptional complexity of different variants of 1-limited automata (1-las), an extension of two-way finite automata (2nfas) characterizing regular languages. In particular, we consider 2nfas with common-guess (2nfas+cg), which are 2nfas equipped with a new kind of nondeterminism that allows the device to initially annotate each input symbol, before performing a read-only computation over the resulting annotated word. Their deterministic counterparts, namely two-way deterministic finite automata with common-guess (2dfas+cg), still have a nondeterministic annotation phase and can be considered as a restriction of 1-las. We prove exponential lower bounds for the simulations of 2dfas+cg (and thus of 1-las) by deterministic 1-las and by 2nfas. These results are derived from a doubly exponential lower bound for the simulation of 2dfas+cg by one-way deterministic finite automata (1dfas). Our lower bounds are witnessed by unary languages, namely languages defined over a singleton alphabet. As a consequence, we close a question left open in [Pighizzini and Prigioniero. Limited automata and unary languages. Inf. Comput., 266:60-74], about the existence of a double exponential gap between 1-las and 1dfas in the unary case. Lastly, we prove an exponential lower bound for complementing unary 2dfas+cg (and thus unary 1-las).
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2025; v1 submitted 11 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Operational State Complexity of Block Languages
Authors:
Guilherme Duarte,
Nelma Moreira,
Luca Prigioniero,
Rogério Reis
Abstract:
In this paper we consider block languages, namely sets of words having the same length, and study the deterministic and nondeterministic state complexity of several operations on these languages. Being a subclass of finite languages, the upper bounds of operational state complexity known for finite languages apply for block languages as well. However, in several cases, smaller values were found. B…
▽ More
In this paper we consider block languages, namely sets of words having the same length, and study the deterministic and nondeterministic state complexity of several operations on these languages. Being a subclass of finite languages, the upper bounds of operational state complexity known for finite languages apply for block languages as well. However, in several cases, smaller values were found. Block languages can be represented as bitmaps, which are a good tool to study their minimal finite automata and their operations, as we illustrate here.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
On the Representation and State Complexity of Block Languages
Authors:
Guilherme Duarte,
Nelma Moreira,
Luca Prigioniero,
Rogério Reis
Abstract:
In this paper, we consider block languages, namely sets of words having the same length, and we propose a new representation for these languages. In particular, given an alphabet of size $k$ and a length $\ell$, a block language can be represented by a bitmap of length $k^\ell$, where each bit indicates whether the corresponding word, according to the lexicographical order, belongs, or not, to the…
▽ More
In this paper, we consider block languages, namely sets of words having the same length, and we propose a new representation for these languages. In particular, given an alphabet of size $k$ and a length $\ell$, a block language can be represented by a bitmap of length $k^\ell$, where each bit indicates whether the corresponding word, according to the lexicographical order, belongs, or not, to the language (bit equal to 1 or 0, respectively). First, we show how to convert bitmaps into deterministic and nondeterministic finite automata, and we prove that the machines are minimal. Then, we give an analysis of the maximum number of states sufficient to accept every block language in the deterministic and nondeterministic case. Finally, we study the deterministic and nondeterministic state complexity of several operations on these languages. Being a subclass of finite languages, the upper bounds of operational state complexity known for finite languages apply for block languages as well. However, in several cases, smaller values were found.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2025; v1 submitted 17 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Once-Marking and Always-Marking 1-Limited Automata
Authors:
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero
Abstract:
Single-tape nondeterministic Turing machines that are allowed to replace the symbol in each tape cell only when it is scanned for the first time are also known as 1-limited automata. These devices characterize, exactly as finite automata, the class of regular languages. However, they can be extremely more succinct. Indeed, in the worst case the size gap from 1-limited automata to one-way determini…
▽ More
Single-tape nondeterministic Turing machines that are allowed to replace the symbol in each tape cell only when it is scanned for the first time are also known as 1-limited automata. These devices characterize, exactly as finite automata, the class of regular languages. However, they can be extremely more succinct. Indeed, in the worst case the size gap from 1-limited automata to one-way deterministic finite automata is double exponential.
Here we introduce two restricted versions of 1-limited automata, once-marking 1-limited automata and always-marking 1-limited automata, and study their descriptional complexity. We prove that once-marking 1-limited automata still exhibit a double exponential size gap to one-way deterministic finite automata. However, their deterministic restriction is polynomially related in size to two-way deterministic finite automata, in contrast to deterministic 1-limited automata, whose equivalent two-way deterministic finite automata in the worst case are exponentially larger. For always-marking 1-limited automata, we prove that the size gap to one-way deterministic finite automata is only a single exponential. The gap remains exponential even in the case the given machine is deterministic.
We obtain other size relationships between different variants of these machines and finite automata and we present some problems that deserve investigation.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Forgetting 1-Limited Automata
Authors:
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero
Abstract:
We introduce and investigate forgetting 1-limited automata, which are single-tape Turing machines that, when visiting a cell for the first time, replace the input symbol in it by a fixed symbol, so forgetting the original contents. These devices have the same computational power as finite automata, namely they characterize the class of regular languages. We study the cost in size of the conversion…
▽ More
We introduce and investigate forgetting 1-limited automata, which are single-tape Turing machines that, when visiting a cell for the first time, replace the input symbol in it by a fixed symbol, so forgetting the original contents. These devices have the same computational power as finite automata, namely they characterize the class of regular languages. We study the cost in size of the conversions of forgetting 1-limited automata, in both nondeterministic and deterministic cases, into equivalent one-way nondeterministic and deterministic automata, providing optimal bounds in terms of exponential or superpolynomial functions. We also discuss the size relationships with two-way finite automata. In this respect, we prove the existence of a language for which forgetting 1-limited automata are exponentially larger than equivalent minimal deterministic two-way automata.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2023; v1 submitted 31 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Magic numbers in periodic sequences
Authors:
Savinien Kreczman,
Luca Prigioniero,
Eric Rowland,
Manon Stipulanti
Abstract:
In formal languages and automata theory, the magic number problem can be formulated as follows: for a given integer n, is it possible to find a number d in the range [n,2^n] such that there is no minimal deterministic finite automaton with d states that can be simulated by an optimal nondeterministic finite automaton with exactly n states? If such a number d exists, it is called magic. In this pap…
▽ More
In formal languages and automata theory, the magic number problem can be formulated as follows: for a given integer n, is it possible to find a number d in the range [n,2^n] such that there is no minimal deterministic finite automaton with d states that can be simulated by an optimal nondeterministic finite automaton with exactly n states? If such a number d exists, it is called magic. In this paper, we consider the magic number problem in the framework of deterministic automata with output, which are known to characterize automatic sequences. More precisely, we investigate magic numbers for periodic sequences viewed as either automatic, regular, or constant-recursive.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2023; v1 submitted 6 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Space Complexity of Stack Automata Models
Authors:
Oscar H. Ibarra,
Jozef Jirásek,
Ian McQuillan,
Luca Prigioniero
Abstract:
This paper examines several measures of space complexity of variants of stack automata: non-erasing stack automata and checking stack automata. These measures capture the minimum stack size required to accept every word in the language of the automaton (weak measure), the maximum stack size used in any accepting computation on any accepted word (accept measure),and the maximum stack size used in a…
▽ More
This paper examines several measures of space complexity of variants of stack automata: non-erasing stack automata and checking stack automata. These measures capture the minimum stack size required to accept every word in the language of the automaton (weak measure), the maximum stack size used in any accepting computation on any accepted word (accept measure),and the maximum stack size used in any computation (strong measure). We give a detailed characterization of the accept and strong space complexity measures for checking stack automata. Exactly one of three cases can occur: the complexity is either bounded by a constant, behaves like a linear function, or it can not be bounded by any function of the length of the input word (and it is decidable which case occurs). However, this result does not hold for non-erasing stack automata; we provide an example where the space complexity grows proportionally to the square root of the length of the input. Furthermore, we study the complexity bounds of machines which accept a given language, and decidability of space complexity properties.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Weight-Reducing Turing Machines
Authors:
Bruno Guillon,
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero,
Daniel Průša
Abstract:
It is well-known that one-tape Turing machines working in linear time are no more powerful than finite automata, namely they recognize exactly the class of regular languages. We prove that it is not decidable if a one-tape machine works in linear time, even if it is deterministic and restricted to use only the portion of the tape which initially contains the input. This motivates the introduction…
▽ More
It is well-known that one-tape Turing machines working in linear time are no more powerful than finite automata, namely they recognize exactly the class of regular languages. We prove that it is not decidable if a one-tape machine works in linear time, even if it is deterministic and restricted to use only the portion of the tape which initially contains the input. This motivates the introduction of a constructive variant of one-tape machines, called weight-reducing machine, and the investigation of its properties. We focus on the deterministic case. In particular, we show that, paying a polynomial size increase only, each weight-reducing machine can be turned into a halting one that works in linear time. Furthermore each weight-reducing machine can be converted into equivalent nondeterministic and deterministic finite automata by paying exponential and doubly-exponential increase in size, respectively. These costs cannot be reduced in general.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Converting Nondeterministic Two-Way Automata into Small Deterministic Linear-Time Machines
Authors:
Bruno Guillon,
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero,
Daniel Průša
Abstract:
In 1978 Sakoda and Sipser raised the question of the cost, in terms of size of representations, of the transformation of two-way and one-way nondeterministic automata into equivalent two-way deterministic automata. Despite all the attempts, the question has been answered only for particular cases (e.g., restrictions of the class of simulated automata or of the class of simulating automata). Howeve…
▽ More
In 1978 Sakoda and Sipser raised the question of the cost, in terms of size of representations, of the transformation of two-way and one-way nondeterministic automata into equivalent two-way deterministic automata. Despite all the attempts, the question has been answered only for particular cases (e.g., restrictions of the class of simulated automata or of the class of simulating automata). However the problem remains open in the general case, the best-known upper bound being exponential. We present a new approach in which unrestricted nondeterministic finite automata are simulated by deterministic models extending two-way deterministic finite automata, paying a polynomial increase of size only. Indeed, we study the costs of the conversions of nondeterministic finite automata into some variants of one-tape deterministic Turing machines working in linear time, namely Hennie machines, weight-reducing Turing machines, and weight-reducing Hennie machines. All these variants are known to share the same computational power: they characterize the class of regular languages.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Weakly and Strongly Irreversible Regular Languages
Authors:
Giovanna J. Lavado,
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero
Abstract:
Finite automata whose computations can be reversed, at any point, by knowing the last k symbols read from the input, for a fixed k, are considered. These devices and their accepted languages are called k-reversible automata and k-reversible languages, respectively. The existence of k-reversible languages which are not (k-1)-reversible is known, for each k>1. This gives an infinite hierarchy of wea…
▽ More
Finite automata whose computations can be reversed, at any point, by knowing the last k symbols read from the input, for a fixed k, are considered. These devices and their accepted languages are called k-reversible automata and k-reversible languages, respectively. The existence of k-reversible languages which are not (k-1)-reversible is known, for each k>1. This gives an infinite hierarchy of weakly irreversible languages, i.e., languages which are k-reversible for some k. Conditions characterizing the class of k-reversible languages, for each fixed k, and the class of weakly irreversible languages are obtained. From these conditions, a procedure that given a finite automaton decides if the accepted language is weakly or strongly (i.e., not weakly) irreversible is described. Furthermore, a construction which allows to transform any finite automaton which is not k-reversible, but which accepts a k-reversible language, into an equivalent k-reversible finite automaton, is presented.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Minimal and Reduced Reversible Automata
Authors:
Giovanna J. Lavado,
Giovanni Pighizzini,
Luca Prigioniero
Abstract:
A condition characterizing the class of regular languages which have several nonisomorphic minimal reversible automata is presented. The condition concerns the structure of the minimum automaton accepting the language under consideration. It is also observed that there exist reduced reversible automata which are not minimal, in the sense that all the automata obtained by merging some of their equi…
▽ More
A condition characterizing the class of regular languages which have several nonisomorphic minimal reversible automata is presented. The condition concerns the structure of the minimum automaton accepting the language under consideration. It is also observed that there exist reduced reversible automata which are not minimal, in the sense that all the automata obtained by merging some of their equivalent states are irreversible. Furthermore, a sufficient condition for the existence of infinitely many reduced reversible automata accepting a same language is given. It is also proved that, when the language is accepted by a unique minimal reversible automaton (that does not necessarily coincide with the minimum deterministic automaton), then no other reduced reversible automata accepting it can exist.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
