-
Optimizing Shortfall Risk Metric for Learning Regression Models
Authors:
Harish G. Ramaswamy,
L. A. Prashanth
Abstract:
We consider the problem of estimating and optimizing utility-based shortfall risk (UBSR) of a loss, say $(Y - \hat Y)^2$, in the context of a regression problem. Empirical risk minimization with a UBSR objective is challenging since UBSR is a non-linear function of the underlying distribution. We first derive a concentration bound for UBSR estimation using independent and identically distributed (…
▽ More
We consider the problem of estimating and optimizing utility-based shortfall risk (UBSR) of a loss, say $(Y - \hat Y)^2$, in the context of a regression problem. Empirical risk minimization with a UBSR objective is challenging since UBSR is a non-linear function of the underlying distribution. We first derive a concentration bound for UBSR estimation using independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples. We then frame the UBSR optimization problem as minimization of a pseudo-linear function in the space of achievable distributions $\mathcal D$ of the loss $(Y- \hat Y)^2$. We construct a gradient oracle for the UBSR objective and a linear minimization oracle (LMO) for the set $\mathcal D$. Using these oracles, we devise a bisection-type algorithm, and establish convergence to the UBSR-optimal solution.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2025; v1 submitted 23 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
A Finite-Sample Analysis of an Actor-Critic Algorithm for Mean-Variance Optimization in a Discounted MDP
Authors:
Tejaram Sangadi,
L. A. Prashanth,
Krishna Jagannathan
Abstract:
Motivated by applications in risk-sensitive reinforcement learning, we study mean-variance optimization in a discounted reward Markov Decision Process (MDP). Specifically, we analyze a Temporal Difference (TD) learning algorithm with linear function approximation (LFA) for policy evaluation. We derive finite-sample bounds that hold (i) in the mean-squared sense and (ii) with high probability under…
▽ More
Motivated by applications in risk-sensitive reinforcement learning, we study mean-variance optimization in a discounted reward Markov Decision Process (MDP). Specifically, we analyze a Temporal Difference (TD) learning algorithm with linear function approximation (LFA) for policy evaluation. We derive finite-sample bounds that hold (i) in the mean-squared sense and (ii) with high probability under tail iterate averaging, both with and without regularization. Our bounds exhibit an exponentially decaying dependence on the initial error and a convergence rate of $O(1/t)$ after $t$ iterations. Moreover, for the regularized TD variant, our bound holds for a universal step size. Next, we integrate a Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA)-based actor update with an LFA critic and establish an $O(n^{-1/4})$ convergence guarantee, where $n$ denotes the iterations of the SPSA-based actor-critic algorithm. These results establish finite-sample theoretical guarantees for risk-sensitive actor-critic methods in reinforcement learning, with a focus on variance as a risk measure.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2025; v1 submitted 12 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Concentration Bounds for Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk Estimation
Authors:
Ayon Ghosh,
L. A. Prashanth,
Krishna Jagannathan
Abstract:
We consider the problem of estimating the Optimized Certainty Equivalent (OCE) risk from independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples. For the classic sample average approximation (SAA) of OCE, we derive mean-squared error as well as concentration bounds (assuming sub-Gaussianity). Further, we analyze an efficient stochastic approximation-based OCE estimator, and derive finite sample b…
▽ More
We consider the problem of estimating the Optimized Certainty Equivalent (OCE) risk from independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples. For the classic sample average approximation (SAA) of OCE, we derive mean-squared error as well as concentration bounds (assuming sub-Gaussianity). Further, we analyze an efficient stochastic approximation-based OCE estimator, and derive finite sample bounds for the same. To show the applicability of our bounds, we consider a risk-aware bandit problem, with OCE as the risk. For this problem, we derive bound on the probability of mis-identification. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to validate the theoretical findings.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Risk Estimation in a Markov Cost Process: Lower and Upper Bounds
Authors:
Gugan Thoppe,
L. A. Prashanth,
Sanjay Bhat
Abstract:
We tackle the problem of estimating risk measures of the infinite-horizon discounted cost within a Markov cost process. The risk measures we study include variance, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). First, we show that estimating any of these risk measures with $ε$-accuracy, either in expected or high-probability sense, requires at least $Ω(1/ε^2)$ samples. Then, using a t…
▽ More
We tackle the problem of estimating risk measures of the infinite-horizon discounted cost within a Markov cost process. The risk measures we study include variance, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). First, we show that estimating any of these risk measures with $ε$-accuracy, either in expected or high-probability sense, requires at least $Ω(1/ε^2)$ samples. Then, using a truncation scheme, we derive an upper bound for the CVaR and variance estimation. This bound matches our lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we discuss an extension of our estimation scheme that covers more general risk measures satisfying a certain continuity criterion, e.g., spectral risk measures, utility-based shortfall risk. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to provide lower and upper bounds for estimating any risk measure beyond the mean within a Markovian setting. Our lower bounds also extend to the infinite-horizon discounted costs' mean. Even in that case, our lower bound of $Ω(1/ε^2) $ improves upon the existing $Ω(1/ε)$ bound [13].
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2024; v1 submitted 17 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Generalized Simultaneous Perturbation-based Gradient Search with Reduced Estimator Bias
Authors:
Soumen Pachal,
Shalabh Bhatnagar,
L. A. Prashanth
Abstract:
We present in this paper a family of generalized simultaneous perturbation-based gradient search (GSPGS) estimators that use noisy function measurements. The number of function measurements required by each estimator is guided by the desired level of accuracy. We first present in detail unbalanced generalized simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (GSPSA) estimators and later present t…
▽ More
We present in this paper a family of generalized simultaneous perturbation-based gradient search (GSPGS) estimators that use noisy function measurements. The number of function measurements required by each estimator is guided by the desired level of accuracy. We first present in detail unbalanced generalized simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (GSPSA) estimators and later present the balanced versions (B-GSPSA) of these. We extend this idea further and present the generalized smoothed functional (GSF) and generalized random directions stochastic approximation (GRDSA) estimators, respectively, as well as their balanced variants. We show that estimators within any specified class requiring more number of function measurements result in lower estimator bias. We present a detailed analysis of both the asymptotic and non-asymptotic convergence of the resulting stochastic approximation schemes. We further present a series of experimental results with the various GSPGS estimators on the Rastrigin and quadratic function objectives. Our experiments are seen to validate our theoretical findings.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2023; v1 submitted 20 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Minimum mean-squared error estimation with bandit feedback
Authors:
Ayon Ghosh,
L. A. Prashanth,
Dipayan Sen,
Aditya Gopalan
Abstract:
We consider the problem of sequentially learning to estimate, in the mean squared error (MSE) sense, a Gaussian $K$-vector of unknown covariance by observing only $m < K$ of its entries in each round. We propose two MSE estimators, and analyze their concentration properties. The first estimator is non-adaptive, as it is tied to a predetermined $m$-subset and lacks the flexibility to transition to…
▽ More
We consider the problem of sequentially learning to estimate, in the mean squared error (MSE) sense, a Gaussian $K$-vector of unknown covariance by observing only $m < K$ of its entries in each round. We propose two MSE estimators, and analyze their concentration properties. The first estimator is non-adaptive, as it is tied to a predetermined $m$-subset and lacks the flexibility to transition to alternative subsets. The second estimator, which is derived using a regression framework, is adaptive and exhibits better concentration bounds in comparison to the first estimator. We frame the MSE estimation problem with bandit feedback, where the objective is to find the MSE-optimal subset with high confidence. We propose a variant of the successive elimination algorithm to solve this problem. We also derive a minimax lower bound to understand the fundamental limit on the sample complexity of this problem.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2025; v1 submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Online Estimation and Optimization of Utility-Based Shortfall Risk
Authors:
Vishwajit Hegde,
Arvind S. Menon,
L. A. Prashanth,
Krishna Jagannathan
Abstract:
Utility-Based Shortfall Risk (UBSR) is a risk metric that is increasingly popular in financial applications, owing to certain desirable properties that it enjoys. We consider the problem of estimating UBSR in a recursive setting, where samples from the underlying loss distribution are available one-at-a-time. We cast the UBSR estimation problem as a root finding problem, and propose stochastic app…
▽ More
Utility-Based Shortfall Risk (UBSR) is a risk metric that is increasingly popular in financial applications, owing to certain desirable properties that it enjoys. We consider the problem of estimating UBSR in a recursive setting, where samples from the underlying loss distribution are available one-at-a-time. We cast the UBSR estimation problem as a root finding problem, and propose stochastic approximation-based estimations schemes. We derive non-asymptotic bounds on the estimation error in the number of samples. We also consider the problem of UBSR optimization within a parameterized class of random variables. We propose a stochastic gradient descent based algorithm for UBSR optimization, and derive non-asymptotic bounds on its convergence.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2023; v1 submitted 16 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
On TD(0) with function approximation: Concentration bounds and a centered variant with exponential convergence
Authors:
Nathaniel Korda,
L. A. Prashanth
Abstract:
We provide non-asymptotic bounds for the well-known temporal difference learning algorithm TD(0) with linear function approximators. These include high-probability bounds as well as bounds in expectation. Our analysis suggests that a step-size inversely proportional to the number of iterations cannot guarantee optimal rate of convergence unless we assume (partial) knowledge of the stationary distr…
▽ More
We provide non-asymptotic bounds for the well-known temporal difference learning algorithm TD(0) with linear function approximators. These include high-probability bounds as well as bounds in expectation. Our analysis suggests that a step-size inversely proportional to the number of iterations cannot guarantee optimal rate of convergence unless we assume (partial) knowledge of the stationary distribution for the Markov chain underlying the policy considered. We also provide bounds for the iterate averaged TD(0) variant, which gets rid of the step-size dependency while exhibiting the optimal rate of convergence. Furthermore, we propose a variant of TD(0) with linear approximators that incorporates a centering sequence, and establish that it exhibits an exponential rate of convergence in expectation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our bounds on two synthetic experimental settings.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2015; v1 submitted 12 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
Simultaneous Perturbation Algorithms for Batch Off-Policy Search
Authors:
Raphael Fonteneau,
L. A. Prashanth
Abstract:
We propose novel policy search algorithms in the context of off-policy, batch mode reinforcement learning (RL) with continuous state and action spaces. Given a batch collection of trajectories, we perform off-line policy evaluation using an algorithm similar to that by [Fonteneau et al., 2010]. Using this Monte-Carlo like policy evaluator, we perform policy search in a class of parameterized polic…
▽ More
We propose novel policy search algorithms in the context of off-policy, batch mode reinforcement learning (RL) with continuous state and action spaces. Given a batch collection of trajectories, we perform off-line policy evaluation using an algorithm similar to that by [Fonteneau et al., 2010]. Using this Monte-Carlo like policy evaluator, we perform policy search in a class of parameterized policies. We propose both first order policy gradient and second order policy Newton algorithms. All our algorithms incorporate simultaneous perturbation estimates for the gradient as well as the Hessian of the cost-to-go vector, since the latter is unknown and only biased estimates are available. We demonstrate their practicality on a simple 1-dimensional continuous state space problem.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2014; v1 submitted 18 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Actor-Critic Algorithms for Learning Nash Equilibria in N-player General-Sum Games
Authors:
H. L Prasad,
L. A. Prashanth,
Shalabh Bhatnagar
Abstract:
We consider the problem of finding stationary Nash equilibria (NE) in a finite discounted general-sum stochastic game. We first generalize a non-linear optimization problem from Filar and Vrieze [2004] to a $N$-player setting and break down this problem into simpler sub-problems that ensure there is no Bellman error for a given state and an agent. We then provide a characterization of solution poi…
▽ More
We consider the problem of finding stationary Nash equilibria (NE) in a finite discounted general-sum stochastic game. We first generalize a non-linear optimization problem from Filar and Vrieze [2004] to a $N$-player setting and break down this problem into simpler sub-problems that ensure there is no Bellman error for a given state and an agent. We then provide a characterization of solution points of these sub-problems that correspond to Nash equilibria of the underlying game and for this purpose, we derive a set of necessary and sufficient SG-SP (Stochastic Game - Sub-Problem) conditions. Using these conditions, we develop two actor-critic algorithms: OFF-SGSP (model-based) and ON-SGSP (model-free). Both algorithms use a critic that estimates the value function for a fixed policy and an actor that performs descent in the policy space using a descent direction that avoids local minima. We establish that both algorithms converge, in self-play, to the equilibria of a certain ordinary differential equation (ODE), whose stable limit points coincide with stationary NE of the underlying general-sum stochastic game. On a single state non-generic game (see Hart and Mas-Colell [2005]) as well as on a synthetic two-player game setup with $810,000$ states, we establish that ON-SGSP consistently outperforms NashQ ([Hu and Wellman, 2003] and FFQ [Littman, 2001] algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2015; v1 submitted 8 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Concentration bounds for temporal difference learning with linear function approximation: The case of batch data and uniform sampling
Authors:
L. A. Prashanth,
Nathaniel Korda,
Rémi Munos
Abstract:
We propose a stochastic approximation (SA) based method with randomization of samples for policy evaluation using the least squares temporal difference (LSTD) algorithm. Our proposed scheme is equivalent to running regular temporal difference learning with linear function approximation, albeit with samples picked uniformly from a given dataset. Our method results in an $O(d)$ improvement in comple…
▽ More
We propose a stochastic approximation (SA) based method with randomization of samples for policy evaluation using the least squares temporal difference (LSTD) algorithm. Our proposed scheme is equivalent to running regular temporal difference learning with linear function approximation, albeit with samples picked uniformly from a given dataset. Our method results in an $O(d)$ improvement in complexity in comparison to LSTD, where $d$ is the dimension of the data. We provide non-asymptotic bounds for our proposed method, both in high probability and in expectation, under the assumption that the matrix underlying the LSTD solution is positive definite. The latter assumption can be easily satisfied for the pathwise LSTD variant proposed in [23]. Moreover, we also establish that using our method in place of LSTD does not impact the rate of convergence of the approximate value function to the true value function. These rate results coupled with the low computational complexity of our method make it attractive for implementation in big data settings, where $d$ is large. A similar low-complexity alternative for least squares regression is well-known as the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm. We provide finite-time bounds for SGD. We demonstrate the practicality of our method as an efficient alternative for pathwise LSTD empirically by combining it with the least squares policy iteration (LSPI) algorithm in a traffic signal control application. We also conduct another set of experiments that combines the SA based low-complexity variant for least squares regression with the LinUCB algorithm for contextual bandits, using the large scale news recommendation dataset from Yahoo.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2020; v1 submitted 11 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.