-
Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Models
Authors:
Anna A. Ivanova,
Aalok Sathe,
Benjamin Lipkin,
Unnathi Kumar,
Setayesh Radkani,
Thomas H. Clark,
Carina Kauf,
Jennifer Hu,
R. T. Pramod,
Gabriel Grand,
Vivian Paulun,
Maria Ryskina,
Ekin Akyürek,
Ethan Wilcox,
Nafisa Rashid,
Leshem Choshen,
Roger Levy,
Evelina Fedorenko,
Joshua Tenenbaum,
Jacob Andreas
Abstract:
The ability to build and reason about models of the world is essential for situated language understanding. But evaluating world modeling capabilities in modern AI systems -- especially those based on language models -- has proven challenging, in large part because of the difficulty of disentangling conceptual knowledge about the world from knowledge of surface co-occurrence statistics. This paper…
▽ More
The ability to build and reason about models of the world is essential for situated language understanding. But evaluating world modeling capabilities in modern AI systems -- especially those based on language models -- has proven challenging, in large part because of the difficulty of disentangling conceptual knowledge about the world from knowledge of surface co-occurrence statistics. This paper presents Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK), a framework for evaluating language models' understanding of the conceptual knowledge underlying world modeling. EWoK targets specific concepts from multiple knowledge domains known to be important for world modeling in humans, from social interactions (help, deceive) to spatial relations (left, right). Objects, agents, and locations in the items can be flexibly filled in, enabling easy generation of multiple controlled datasets. We then introduce EWoK-core-1.0, a dataset of 4,374 items covering 11 world knowledge domains. We evaluate 20 open-weights large language models (1.3B--70B parameters) and compare them with human performance. All tested models perform worse than humans, with results varying drastically across domains. Performance on social interactions and social properties was highest and performance on physical relations and spatial relations was lowest. Overall, this dataset highlights simple cases where even large models struggle and presents rich avenues for targeted research on LLM world modeling capabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2025; v1 submitted 15 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machines
Authors:
Daniel M. Bear,
Elias Wang,
Damian Mrowca,
Felix J. Binder,
Hsiao-Yu Fish Tung,
R. T. Pramod,
Cameron Holdaway,
Sirui Tao,
Kevin Smith,
Fan-Yun Sun,
Li Fei-Fei,
Nancy Kanwisher,
Joshua B. Tenenbaum,
Daniel L. K. Yamins,
Judith E. Fan
Abstract:
While current vision algorithms excel at many challenging tasks, it is unclear how well they understand the physical dynamics of real-world environments. Here we introduce Physion, a dataset and benchmark for rigorously evaluating the ability to predict how physical scenarios will evolve over time. Our dataset features realistic simulations of a wide range of physical phenomena, including rigid an…
▽ More
While current vision algorithms excel at many challenging tasks, it is unclear how well they understand the physical dynamics of real-world environments. Here we introduce Physion, a dataset and benchmark for rigorously evaluating the ability to predict how physical scenarios will evolve over time. Our dataset features realistic simulations of a wide range of physical phenomena, including rigid and soft-body collisions, stable multi-object configurations, rolling, sliding, and projectile motion, thus providing a more comprehensive challenge than previous benchmarks. We used Physion to benchmark a suite of models varying in their architecture, learning objective, input-output structure, and training data. In parallel, we obtained precise measurements of human prediction behavior on the same set of scenarios, allowing us to directly evaluate how well any model could approximate human behavior. We found that vision algorithms that learn object-centric representations generally outperform those that do not, yet still fall far short of human performance. On the other hand, graph neural networks with direct access to physical state information both perform substantially better and make predictions that are more similar to those made by humans. These results suggest that extracting physical representations of scenes is the main bottleneck to achieving human-level and human-like physical understanding in vision algorithms. We have publicly released all data and code to facilitate the use of Physion to benchmark additional models in a fully reproducible manner, enabling systematic evaluation of progress towards vision algorithms that understand physical environments as robustly as people do.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Human peripheral blur is optimal for object recognition
Authors:
R. T. Pramod,
Harish Katti,
S. P. Arun
Abstract:
Our vision is sharpest at the center of our gaze and becomes progressively blurry into the periphery. It is widely believed that this high foveal resolution evolved at the expense of peripheral acuity. But what if this sampling scheme is actually optimal for object recognition? To test this hypothesis, we trained deep neural networks on 'foveated' images with high resolution near objects and incre…
▽ More
Our vision is sharpest at the center of our gaze and becomes progressively blurry into the periphery. It is widely believed that this high foveal resolution evolved at the expense of peripheral acuity. But what if this sampling scheme is actually optimal for object recognition? To test this hypothesis, we trained deep neural networks on 'foveated' images with high resolution near objects and increasingly sparse sampling into the periphery. Neural networks trained using a blur profile matching the human eye yielded the best performance compared to shallower and steeper blur profiles. Even in humans, categorization accuracy deteriorated only for steeper blur profiles. Thus, our blurry peripheral vision may have evolved to optimize object recognition rather than merely due to wiring constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
