Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Pironneau, O

Performance of a Markovian neural network versus dynamic programming on a fishing control problem

Authors: Mathieu Laurière, Gilles Pagès, Olivier Pironneau

Abstract: Fishing quotas are unpleasant but efficient to control the productivity of a fishing site. A popular model has a stochastic differential equation for the biomass on which a stochastic dynamic programming or a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman algorithm can be used to find the stochastic control -- the fishing quota. We compare the solutions obtained by dynamic programming against those obtained with a neura… ▽ More Fishing quotas are unpleasant but efficient to control the productivity of a fishing site. A popular model has a stochastic differential equation for the biomass on which a stochastic dynamic programming or a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman algorithm can be used to find the stochastic control -- the fishing quota. We compare the solutions obtained by dynamic programming against those obtained with a neural network which preserves the Markov property of the solution. The method is extended to a similar multi species model to check its robustness in high dimension. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

An energy stable one-field monolithic arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for fluid-structure interaction

Authors: Yongxing Wang, Peter K. Jimack, Mark A. Walkley, Olivier Pironneau

Abstract: In this article we present a one-field monolithic finite element method in the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation for Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) problems. The method only solves for one velocity field in the whole FSI domain, and it solves in a monolithic manner so that the fluid solid interface conditions are satisfied automatically. We prove that the proposed scheme is uncond… ▽ More In this article we present a one-field monolithic finite element method in the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation for Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) problems. The method only solves for one velocity field in the whole FSI domain, and it solves in a monolithic manner so that the fluid solid interface conditions are satisfied automatically. We prove that the proposed scheme is unconditionally stable, through energy analysis, by utilising a conservative formulation and an exact quadrature rule. We implement the algorithm using both ${\bf F}$-scheme and ${\bf d}$-scheme, and demonstrate that the former has the same formulation in two and three dimensions. Finally several numerical examples are presented to validate this methodology, including combination with remesh techniques to handle the case of very large solid displacement. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Mini-symposium on automatic differentiation and its applications in the financial industry

Authors: Sébastien Geeraert, Charles-Albert Lehalle, Barak Pearlmutter, Olivier Pironneau, Adil Reghai

Abstract: Automatic differentiation is involved for long in applied mathematics as an alternative to finite difference to improve the accuracy of numerical computation of derivatives. Each time a numerical minimization is involved, automatic differentiation can be used. In between formal derivation and standard numerical schemes, this approach is based on software solutions applying mechanically the chain r… ▽ More Automatic differentiation is involved for long in applied mathematics as an alternative to finite difference to improve the accuracy of numerical computation of derivatives. Each time a numerical minimization is involved, automatic differentiation can be used. In between formal derivation and standard numerical schemes, this approach is based on software solutions applying mechanically the chain rule to obtain an exact value for the desired derivative. It has a cost in memory and cpu consumption. For participants of financial markets (banks, insurances, financial intermediaries, etc), computing derivatives is needed to obtain the sensitivity of its exposure to well-defined potential market moves. It is a way to understand variations of their balance sheets in specific cases. Since the 2008 crisis, regulation demand to compute this kind of exposure to many different case, to be sure market participants are aware and ready to face a wide spectrum of configurations. This paper shows how automatic differentiation provides a partial answer to this recent explosion of computation to perform. One part of the answer is a straightforward application of Adjoint Algorithmic Differentiation (AAD), but it is not enough. Since financial sensitivities involves specific functions and mix differentiation with Monte-Carlo simulations, dedicated tools and associated theoretical results are needed. We give here short introductions to typical cases arising when one use AAD on financial markets. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2017; v1 submitted 7 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

An Energy stable Monolithic Eulerian Fluid-Structure Numerical Scheme *

Authors: Olivier Pironneau

Abstract: The conservation laws of continuum mechanic written in an Eulerian frame make no difference between fluids and solids except in the expression of the stress tensors, usually with Newton's hypothesis for the fluids and Helmholtz potentials of energy for hyperelastic solids. By taking the velocities as unknown , monolithic methods for fluid structure interactions (FSI) are built. In this article suc… ▽ More The conservation laws of continuum mechanic written in an Eulerian frame make no difference between fluids and solids except in the expression of the stress tensors, usually with Newton's hypothesis for the fluids and Helmholtz potentials of energy for hyperelastic solids. By taking the velocities as unknown , monolithic methods for fluid structure interactions (FSI) are built. In this article such a formulation is analyzed when the fluid is compressible and the fluid is incompressible. The idea is not new but the progress of mesh generators and numerical schemes like the Characteristics-Galerkin method render this approach feasible and reasonably robust. In this article the method and its discretization are presented, stability is discussed by through an energy estimate. A numerical section discusses implementation issues and presents a few simple tests. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2017; v1 submitted 27 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Vibrato and automatic differentiation for high order derivatives and sensitivities of financial options

Authors: Gilles Pagès, Olivier Pironneau, Guillaume Sall

Abstract: This paper deals with the computation of second or higher order greeks of financial securities. It combines two methods, Vibrato and automatic differentiation and compares with other methods. We show that this combined technique is faster than standard finite difference, more stable than automatic differentiation of second order derivatives and more general than Malliavin Calculus. We present a ge… ▽ More This paper deals with the computation of second or higher order greeks of financial securities. It combines two methods, Vibrato and automatic differentiation and compares with other methods. We show that this combined technique is faster than standard finite difference, more stable than automatic differentiation of second order derivatives and more general than Malliavin Calculus. We present a generic framework to compute any greeks and present several applications on different types of financial contracts: European and American options, multidimensional Basket Call and stochastic volatility models such as Heston's model. We give also an algorithm to compute derivatives for the Longstaff-Schwartz Monte Carlo method for American options. We also extend automatic differentiation for second order derivatives of options with non-twice differentiable payoff. 1. Introduction. Due to BASEL III regulations, banks are requested to evaluate the sensitivities of their portfolios every day (risk assessment). Some of these portfolios are huge and sensitivities are time consuming to compute accurately. Faced with the problem of building a software for this task and distrusting automatic differentiation for non-differentiable functions, we turned to an idea developed by Mike Giles called Vibrato. Vibrato at core is a differentiation of a combination of likelihood ratio method and pathwise evaluation. In Giles [12], [13], it is shown that the computing time, stability and precision are enhanced compared with numerical differentiation of the full Monte Carlo path. In many cases, double sensitivities, i.e. second derivatives with respect to parameters, are needed (e.g. gamma hedging). Finite difference approximation of sensitivities is a very simple method but its precision is hard to control because it relies on the appropriate choice of the increment. Automatic differentiation of computer programs bypass the difficulty and its computing cost is similar to finite difference, if not cheaper. But in finance the payoff is never twice differentiable and so generalized derivatives have to be used requiring approximations of Dirac functions of which the precision is also doubtful. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the feasibility of Vibrato for second and higher derivatives. We will first compare Vibrato applied twice with the analytic differentiation of Vibrato and show that it is equivalent, as the second is easier we propose the best compromise for second derivatives: Automatic Differentiation of Vibrato. In [8], Capriotti has recently investigated the coupling of different mathematical methods -- namely pathwise and likelihood ratio methods -- with an Automatic differ △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Continuous and Discrete Adjoints to the Euler Equations for Fluids

Authors: Frederic Alauzet, Olivier Pironneau

Abstract: Adjoints are used in optimization to speed-up computations, simplify optimality conditions or compute sensitivities. Because time is reversed in adjoint equations with first order time derivatives, boundary conditions and transmission conditions through shocks can be difficult to understand. In this article we analyze the adjoint equations that arise in the context of compressible flows governed b… ▽ More Adjoints are used in optimization to speed-up computations, simplify optimality conditions or compute sensitivities. Because time is reversed in adjoint equations with first order time derivatives, boundary conditions and transmission conditions through shocks can be difficult to understand. In this article we analyze the adjoint equations that arise in the context of compressible flows governed by the Euler equations of fluid dynamics. We show that the continuous adjoints and the discrete adjoints computed by automatic differentiation agree numerically; in particular the adjoint is found to be continuous at the shocks and usually discontinuous at contact discontinuities by both. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2011; originally announced April 2011.

Comments: 30 pages 16 figures