-
Learning to Detect Label Errors by Making Them: A Method for Segmentation and Object Detection Datasets
Authors:
Sarina Penquitt,
Tobias Riedlinger,
Timo Heller,
Markus Reischl,
Matthias Rottmann
Abstract:
Recently, detection of label errors and improvement of label quality in datasets for supervised learning tasks has become an increasingly important goal in both research and industry. The consequences of incorrectly annotated data include reduced model performance, biased benchmark results, and lower overall accuracy. Current state-of-the-art label error detection methods often focus on a single c…
▽ More
Recently, detection of label errors and improvement of label quality in datasets for supervised learning tasks has become an increasingly important goal in both research and industry. The consequences of incorrectly annotated data include reduced model performance, biased benchmark results, and lower overall accuracy. Current state-of-the-art label error detection methods often focus on a single computer vision task and, consequently, a specific type of dataset, containing, for example, either bounding boxes or pixel-wise annotations. Furthermore, previous methods are not learning-based. In this work, we overcome this research gap. We present a unified method for detecting label errors in object detection, semantic segmentation, and instance segmentation datasets. In a nutshell, our approach - learning to detect label errors by making them - works as follows: we inject different kinds of label errors into the ground truth. Then, the detection of label errors, across all mentioned primary tasks, is framed as an instance segmentation problem based on a composite input. In our experiments, we compare the label error detection performance of our method with various baselines and state-of-the-art approaches of each task's domain on simulated label errors across multiple tasks, datasets, and base models. This is complemented by a generalization study on real-world label errors. Additionally, we release 459 real label errors identified in the Cityscapes dataset and provide a benchmark for real label error detection in Cityscapes.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2025;
originally announced August 2025.
-
From Label Error Detection to Correction: A Modular Framework and Benchmark for Object Detection Datasets
Authors:
Sarina Penquitt,
Jonathan Klees,
Rinor Cakaj,
Daniel Kondermann,
Matthias Rottmann,
Lars Schmarje
Abstract:
Object detection has advanced rapidly in recent years, driven by increasingly large and diverse datasets. However, label errors, defined as missing labels, incorrect classification or inaccurate localization, often compromise the quality of these datasets. This can have a significant impact on the outcomes of training and benchmark evaluations. Although several methods now exist for detecting labe…
▽ More
Object detection has advanced rapidly in recent years, driven by increasingly large and diverse datasets. However, label errors, defined as missing labels, incorrect classification or inaccurate localization, often compromise the quality of these datasets. This can have a significant impact on the outcomes of training and benchmark evaluations. Although several methods now exist for detecting label errors in object detection datasets, they are typically validated only on synthetic benchmarks or limited manual inspection. How to correct such errors systemically and at scale therefore remains an open problem. We introduce a semi-automated framework for label-error correction called REC$\checkmark$D (Rechecked). Building on existing detectors, the framework pairs their error proposals with lightweight, crowd-sourced microtasks. These tasks enable multiple annotators to independently verify each candidate bounding box, and their responses are aggregated to estimate ambiguity and improve label quality. To demonstrate the effectiveness of REC$\checkmark$D, we apply it to the class pedestrian in the KITTI dataset. Our crowdsourced review yields high-quality corrected annotations, which indicate a rate of at least 24% of missing and inaccurate annotations in original annotations. This validated set will be released as a new real-world benchmark for label error detection and correction. We show that current label error detection methods, when combined with our correction framework, can recover hundreds of errors in the time it would take a human to annotate bounding boxes from scratch. However, even the best methods still miss up to 66% of the true errors and with low quality labels introduce more errors than they find. This highlights the urgent need for further research, now enabled by our released benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2025;
originally announced August 2025.
-
LMD: Light-weight Prediction Quality Estimation for Object Detection in Lidar Point Clouds
Authors:
Tobias Riedlinger,
Marius Schubert,
Sarina Penquitt,
Jan-Marcel Kezmann,
Pascal Colling,
Karsten Kahl,
Lutz Roese-Koerner,
Michael Arnold,
Urs Zimmermann,
Matthias Rottmann
Abstract:
Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying…
▽ More
Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty tend to alter the training scheme of the detector or rely on prediction sampling which results in vastly increased inference time. In order to address these two issues, we propose LidarMetaDetect (LMD), a light-weight post-processing scheme for prediction quality estimation. Our method can easily be added to any pre-trained Lidar object detector without altering anything about the base model and is purely based on post-processing, therefore, only leading to a negligible computational overhead. Our experiments show a significant increase of statistical reliability in separating true from false predictions. We propose and evaluate an additional application of our method leading to the detection of annotation errors. Explicit samples and a conservative count of annotation error proposals indicates the viability of our method for large-scale datasets like KITTI and nuScenes. On the widely-used nuScenes test dataset, 43 out of the top 100 proposals of our method indicate, in fact, erroneous annotations.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
LU-Net: Invertible Neural Networks Based on Matrix Factorization
Authors:
Robin Chan,
Sarina Penquitt,
Hanno Gottschalk
Abstract:
LU-Net is a simple and fast architecture for invertible neural networks (INN) that is based on the factorization of quadratic weight matrices $\mathsf{A=LU}$, where $\mathsf{L}$ is a lower triangular matrix with ones on the diagonal and $\mathsf{U}$ an upper triangular matrix. Instead of learning a fully occupied matrix $\mathsf{A}$, we learn $\mathsf{L}$ and $\mathsf{U}$ separately. If combined w…
▽ More
LU-Net is a simple and fast architecture for invertible neural networks (INN) that is based on the factorization of quadratic weight matrices $\mathsf{A=LU}$, where $\mathsf{L}$ is a lower triangular matrix with ones on the diagonal and $\mathsf{U}$ an upper triangular matrix. Instead of learning a fully occupied matrix $\mathsf{A}$, we learn $\mathsf{L}$ and $\mathsf{U}$ separately. If combined with an invertible activation function, such layers can easily be inverted whenever the diagonal entries of $\mathsf{U}$ are different from zero. Also, the computation of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix of such layers is cheap. Consequently, the LU architecture allows for cheap computation of the likelihood via the change of variables formula and can be trained according to the maximum likelihood principle. In our numerical experiments, we test the LU-net architecture as generative model on several academic datasets. We also provide a detailed comparison with conventional invertible neural networks in terms of performance, training as well as run time.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
