Risk Assessment and Threat Modeling for safe autonomous driving technology
Authors:
Ian Alexis Wong Paz,
Anuvinda Balan,
Sebastian Campos,
Ehud Orenstain,
Sudip Dhakal
Abstract:
This research paper delves into the field of autonomous vehicle technology, examining the vulnerabilities inherent in each component of these transformative vehicles. Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are revolutionizing transportation by seamlessly integrating advanced functionalities such as sensing, perception, planning, decision-making, and control. However, their reliance on interconnected systems an…
▽ More
This research paper delves into the field of autonomous vehicle technology, examining the vulnerabilities inherent in each component of these transformative vehicles. Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are revolutionizing transportation by seamlessly integrating advanced functionalities such as sensing, perception, planning, decision-making, and control. However, their reliance on interconnected systems and external communication interfaces renders them susceptible to cybersecurity threats.
This research endeavors to develop a comprehensive threat model for AV systems, employing OWASP Threat Dragon and the STRIDE framework. This model categorizes threats into Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service (DoS), and Elevation of Privilege.
A systematic risk assessment is conducted to evaluate vulnerabilities across various AV components, including perception modules, planning systems, control units, and communication interfaces.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'
Authors:
Sjors Ligthart,
Marcello Ienca,
Gerben Meynen,
Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor,
Roberto Andorno,
Christoph Bublitz,
Paul Catley,
Lisa Claydon,
Thomas Douglas,
Nita Farahany,
Joseph J. Fins,
Sara Goering,
Pim Haselager,
Fabrice Jotterand,
Andrea Lavazza,
Allan McCay,
Abel Wajnerman Paz,
Stephen Rainey,
Jesper Ryberg,
Philipp Kellmeyer
Abstract:
The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and internati…
▽ More
The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as 'neurorights' in ethical, legal and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including 'neurorights' into their constitutional legal frameworks and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of 'neurorights' the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or are in conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work here is to provide conceptual, ethical and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal and policy discussions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
