-
sbi reloaded: a toolkit for simulation-based inference workflows
Authors:
Jan Boelts,
Michael Deistler,
Manuel Gloeckler,
Álvaro Tejero-Cantero,
Jan-Matthis Lueckmann,
Guy Moss,
Peter Steinbach,
Thomas Moreau,
Fabio Muratore,
Julia Linhart,
Conor Durkan,
Julius Vetter,
Benjamin Kurt Miller,
Maternus Herold,
Abolfazl Ziaeemehr,
Matthijs Pals,
Theo Gruner,
Sebastian Bischoff,
Nastya Krouglova,
Richard Gao,
Janne K. Lappalainen,
Bálint Mucsányi,
Felix Pei,
Auguste Schulz,
Zinovia Stefanidi
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientists and engineers use simulators to model empirically observed phenomena. However, tuning the parameters of a simulator to ensure its outputs match observed data presents a significant challenge. Simulation-based inference (SBI) addresses this by enabling Bayesian inference for simulators, identifying parameters that match observed data and align with prior knowledge. Unlike traditional Bay…
▽ More
Scientists and engineers use simulators to model empirically observed phenomena. However, tuning the parameters of a simulator to ensure its outputs match observed data presents a significant challenge. Simulation-based inference (SBI) addresses this by enabling Bayesian inference for simulators, identifying parameters that match observed data and align with prior knowledge. Unlike traditional Bayesian inference, SBI only needs access to simulations from the model and does not require evaluations of the likelihood function. In addition, SBI algorithms do not require gradients through the simulator, allow for massive parallelization of simulations, and can perform inference for different observations without further simulations or training, thereby amortizing inference. Over the past years, we have developed, maintained, and extended sbi, a PyTorch-based package that implements Bayesian SBI algorithms based on neural networks. The sbi toolkit implements a wide range of inference methods, neural network architectures, sampling methods, and diagnostic tools. In addition, it provides well-tested default settings, but also offers flexibility to fully customize every step of the simulation-based inference workflow. Taken together, the sbi toolkit enables scientists and engineers to apply state-of-the-art SBI methods to black-box simulators, opening up new possibilities for aligning simulations with empirically observed data.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2025; v1 submitted 26 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Inferring stochastic low-rank recurrent neural networks from neural data
Authors:
Matthijs Pals,
A Erdem Sağtekin,
Felix Pei,
Manuel Gloeckler,
Jakob H Macke
Abstract:
A central aim in computational neuroscience is to relate the activity of large populations of neurons to an underlying dynamical system. Models of these neural dynamics should ideally be both interpretable and fit the observed data well. Low-rank recurrent neural networks (RNNs) exhibit such interpretability by having tractable dynamics. However, it is unclear how to best fit low-rank RNNs to data…
▽ More
A central aim in computational neuroscience is to relate the activity of large populations of neurons to an underlying dynamical system. Models of these neural dynamics should ideally be both interpretable and fit the observed data well. Low-rank recurrent neural networks (RNNs) exhibit such interpretability by having tractable dynamics. However, it is unclear how to best fit low-rank RNNs to data consisting of noisy observations of an underlying stochastic system. Here, we propose to fit stochastic low-rank RNNs with variational sequential Monte Carlo methods. We validate our method on several datasets consisting of both continuous and spiking neural data, where we obtain lower dimensional latent dynamics than current state of the art methods. Additionally, for low-rank models with piecewise linear nonlinearities, we show how to efficiently identify all fixed points in polynomial rather than exponential cost in the number of units, making analysis of the inferred dynamics tractable for large RNNs. Our method both elucidates the dynamical systems underlying experimental recordings and provides a generative model whose trajectories match observed variability.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2025; v1 submitted 24 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A Practical Guide to Sample-based Statistical Distances for Evaluating Generative Models in Science
Authors:
Sebastian Bischoff,
Alana Darcher,
Michael Deistler,
Richard Gao,
Franziska Gerken,
Manuel Gloeckler,
Lisa Haxel,
Jaivardhan Kapoor,
Janne K Lappalainen,
Jakob H Macke,
Guy Moss,
Matthijs Pals,
Felix Pei,
Rachel Rapp,
A Erdem Sağtekin,
Cornelius Schröder,
Auguste Schulz,
Zinovia Stefanidi,
Shoji Toyota,
Linda Ulmer,
Julius Vetter
Abstract:
Generative models are invaluable in many fields of science because of their ability to capture high-dimensional and complicated distributions, such as photo-realistic images, protein structures, and connectomes. How do we evaluate the samples these models generate? This work aims to provide an accessible entry point to understanding popular sample-based statistical distances, requiring only founda…
▽ More
Generative models are invaluable in many fields of science because of their ability to capture high-dimensional and complicated distributions, such as photo-realistic images, protein structures, and connectomes. How do we evaluate the samples these models generate? This work aims to provide an accessible entry point to understanding popular sample-based statistical distances, requiring only foundational knowledge in mathematics and statistics. We focus on four commonly used notions of statistical distances representing different methodologies: Using low-dimensional projections (Sliced-Wasserstein; SW), obtaining a distance using classifiers (Classifier Two-Sample Tests; C2ST), using embeddings through kernels (Maximum Mean Discrepancy; MMD), or neural networks (Fréchet Inception Distance; FID). We highlight the intuition behind each distance and explain their merits, scalability, complexity, and pitfalls. To demonstrate how these distances are used in practice, we evaluate generative models from different scientific domains, namely a model of decision-making and a model generating medical images. We showcase that distinct distances can give different results on similar data. Through this guide, we aim to help researchers to use, interpret, and evaluate statistical distances for generative models in science.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2024; v1 submitted 19 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
