-
Automated, LLM enabled extraction of synthesis details for reticular materials from scientific literature
Authors:
Viviane Torres da Silva,
Alexandre Rademaker,
Krystelle Lionti,
Ronaldo Giro,
Geisa Lima,
Sandro Fiorini,
Marcelo Archanjo,
Breno W. Carvalho,
Rodrigo Neumann,
Anaximandro Souza,
João Pedro Souza,
Gabriela de Valnisio,
Carmen Nilda Paz,
Renato Cerqueira,
Mathias Steiner
Abstract:
Automated knowledge extraction from scientific literature can potentially accelerate materials discovery. We have investigated an approach for extracting synthesis protocols for reticular materials from scientific literature using large language models (LLMs). To that end, we introduce a Knowledge Extraction Pipeline (KEP) that automatizes LLM-assisted paragraph classification and information extr…
▽ More
Automated knowledge extraction from scientific literature can potentially accelerate materials discovery. We have investigated an approach for extracting synthesis protocols for reticular materials from scientific literature using large language models (LLMs). To that end, we introduce a Knowledge Extraction Pipeline (KEP) that automatizes LLM-assisted paragraph classification and information extraction. By applying prompt engineering with in-context learning (ICL) to a set of open-source LLMs, we demonstrate that LLMs can retrieve chemical information from PDF documents, without the need for fine-tuning or training and at a reduced risk of hallucination. By comparing the performance of five open-source families of LLMs in both paragraph classification and information extraction tasks, we observe excellent model performance even if only few example paragraphs are included in the ICL prompts. The results show the potential of the KEP approach for reducing human annotations and data curation efforts in automated scientific knowledge extraction.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?
Authors:
Marco Kuhrmann,
Paolo Tell,
Regina Hebig,
Jil Klünder,
Jürgen Münch,
Oliver Linssen,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Michael Felderer,
Christian R. Prause,
Stephen G. MacDonell,
Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende,
David Raffo,
Sarah Beecham,
Eray Tüzün,
Gustavo López,
Nicolas Paez,
Diego Fontdevila,
Sherlock A. Licorish,
Steffen Küpper,
Günther Ruhe,
Eric Knauss,
Özden Özcan-Top,
Paul Clarke,
Fergal McCaffery,
Marcela Genero
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by…
▽ More
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15%). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Quantum Entanglement in Time for a Distributed Ledger
Authors:
Nils Paz,
Steven Silverman,
John Harmon
Abstract:
Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) is a shared, synchronized and replicated data spread spatially and temporally with no centralized administration and/or storage. Each node has a complete and identical set of records. All participants contribute to building and maintaining the distributed ledger. Current DLT technologies fall into two broad categories. Those that use block-chains such as in Bitc…
▽ More
Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) is a shared, synchronized and replicated data spread spatially and temporally with no centralized administration and/or storage. Each node has a complete and identical set of records. All participants contribute to building and maintaining the distributed ledger. Current DLT technologies fall into two broad categories. Those that use block-chains such as in Bitcoin or Ethereum, and newer approaches which reduce computational loads for verification. All current approaches though difficult to crack can be vulnerable to quantum algorithms using Quantum Information Technologies (QIT). This effort joins the 2 technologies, constructing a Quantum Distributed Ledger (QDL) which provides a higher level of security using QIT and a decentralized data depository using DLT. This enhanced security prevents middleman attacks with quantum computers yet retains the advantages of a decentralized ledger of data.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
