Dominic Welsh: his work and influence
Authors:
Graham Farr,
Dillon Mayhew,
James Oxley
Abstract:
We review the work of Dominic Welsh (1938-2023), tracing his remarkable influence through his theorems, expository writing, students, and interactions. He was particularly adept at bringing different fields together and fostering the development of mathematics and mathematicians. His contributions ranged widely across discrete mathematics over four main career phases: discrete probability, matroid…
▽ More
We review the work of Dominic Welsh (1938-2023), tracing his remarkable influence through his theorems, expository writing, students, and interactions. He was particularly adept at bringing different fields together and fostering the development of mathematics and mathematicians. His contributions ranged widely across discrete mathematics over four main career phases: discrete probability, matroids and graphs, computational complexity, and Tutte-Whitney polynomials. We give particular emphasis to his work in matroid theory and Tutte-Whitney polynomials.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Pathologist-Level Grading of Prostate Biopsies with Artificial Intelligence
Authors:
Peter Ström,
Kimmo Kartasalo,
Henrik Olsson,
Leslie Solorzano,
Brett Delahunt,
Daniel M. Berney,
David G. Bostwick,
Andrew J. Evans,
David J. Grignon,
Peter A. Humphrey,
Kenneth A. Iczkowski,
James G. Kench,
Glen Kristiansen,
Theodorus H. van der Kwast,
Katia R. M. Leite,
Jesse K. McKenney,
Jon Oxley,
Chin-Chen Pan,
Hemamali Samaratunga,
John R. Srigley,
Hiroyuki Takahashi,
Toyonori Tsuzuki,
Murali Varma,
Ming Zhou,
Johan Lindberg
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background: An increasing volume of prostate biopsies and a world-wide shortage of uro-pathologists puts a strain on pathology departments. Additionally, the high intra- and inter-observer variability in grading can result in over- and undertreatment of prostate cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods may alleviate these problems by assisting pathologists to reduce workload and harmonize grad…
▽ More
Background: An increasing volume of prostate biopsies and a world-wide shortage of uro-pathologists puts a strain on pathology departments. Additionally, the high intra- and inter-observer variability in grading can result in over- and undertreatment of prostate cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods may alleviate these problems by assisting pathologists to reduce workload and harmonize grading.
Methods: We digitized 6,682 needle biopsies from 976 participants in the population based STHLM3 diagnostic study to train deep neural networks for assessing prostate biopsies. The networks were evaluated by predicting the presence, extent, and Gleason grade of malignant tissue for an independent test set comprising 1,631 biopsies from 245 men. We additionally evaluated grading performance on 87 biopsies individually graded by 23 experienced urological pathologists from the International Society of Urological Pathology. We assessed discriminatory performance by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and tumor extent predictions by correlating predicted millimeter cancer length against measurements by the reporting pathologist. We quantified the concordance between grades assigned by the AI and the expert urological pathologists using Cohen's kappa.
Results: The performance of the AI to detect and grade cancer in prostate needle biopsy samples was comparable to that of international experts in prostate pathology. The AI achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.997 for distinguishing between benign and malignant biopsy cores, and 0.999 for distinguishing between men with or without prostate cancer. The correlation between millimeter cancer predicted by the AI and assigned by the reporting pathologist was 0.96. For assigning Gleason grades, the AI achieved an average pairwise kappa of 0.62. This was within the range of the corresponding values for the expert pathologists (0.60 to 0.73).
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
