Number of hidden states needed to physically implement a given conditional distribution
Authors:
Jeremy A. Owen,
Artemy Kolchinsky,
David H. Wolpert
Abstract:
We consider the problem of how to construct a physical process over a finite state space $X$ that applies some desired conditional distribution $P$ to initial states to produce final states. This problem arises often in the thermodynamics of computation and nonequilibrium statistical physics more generally (e.g., when designing processes to implement some desired computation, feedback controller,…
▽ More
We consider the problem of how to construct a physical process over a finite state space $X$ that applies some desired conditional distribution $P$ to initial states to produce final states. This problem arises often in the thermodynamics of computation and nonequilibrium statistical physics more generally (e.g., when designing processes to implement some desired computation, feedback controller, or Maxwell demon). It was previously known that some conditional distributions cannot be implemented using any master equation that involves just the states in $X$. However, here we show that any conditional distribution $P$ can in fact be implemented---if additional "hidden" states not in $X$ are available. Moreover, we show that it is always possible to implement $P$ in a thermodynamically reversible manner. We then investigate a novel cost of the physical resources needed to implement a given distribution $P$: the minimal number of hidden states needed to do so. We calculate this cost exactly for the special case where $P$ represents a single-valued function, and provide an upper bound for the general case, in terms of the nonnegative rank of $P$. These results show that having access to one extra binary degree of freedom, thus doubling the total number of states, is sufficient to implement any $P$ with a master equation in a thermodynamically reversible way, if there are no constraints on the allowed form of the master equation. (Such constraints can greatly increase the minimal needed number of hidden states.) Our results also imply that for certain $P$ that can be implemented without hidden states, having hidden states permits an implementation that generates less heat.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2019; v1 submitted 3 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
A space-time tradeoff for implementing a function with master equation dynamics
Authors:
David H. Wolpert,
Artemy Kolchinsky,
Jeremy A. Owen
Abstract:
Master equations are commonly used to model the dynamics of physical systems, including systems that implement single-valued functions like a computer's update step. However, many such functions cannot be implemented by any master equation, even approximately, which raises the question of how they can occur in the real world. Here we show how any function over some "visible" states can be implemen…
▽ More
Master equations are commonly used to model the dynamics of physical systems, including systems that implement single-valued functions like a computer's update step. However, many such functions cannot be implemented by any master equation, even approximately, which raises the question of how they can occur in the real world. Here we show how any function over some "visible" states can be implemented with master equation dynamics--if the dynamics exploits additional, "hidden" states at intermediate times. We also show that any master equation implementing a function can be decomposed into a sequence of "hidden" timesteps, demarcated by changes in what state-to-state transitions have nonzero probability. In many real-world situations there is a cost both for more hidden states and for more hidden timesteps. Accordingly, we derive a "space-time" tradeoff between the number of hidden states and the number of hidden timesteps needed to implement any given function.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2019; v1 submitted 28 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
