-
Market, power, gift, and concession economies: Comparison using four-mode primitive network models
Authors:
Takeshi Kato,
Junichi Miyakoshi,
Misa Owa,
Ryuji Mine
Abstract:
Reducing wealth inequality is a global challenge, and the problems of capitalism stem from the enclosure of the commons and the breakdown of the community. According to previous studies by Polanyi, Karatani, and Graeber, economic modes can be divided into capitalist market economy (enclosure and exchange), power economy (de-enclosure and redistribution), gift economy (obligation to return and reci…
▽ More
Reducing wealth inequality is a global challenge, and the problems of capitalism stem from the enclosure of the commons and the breakdown of the community. According to previous studies by Polanyi, Karatani, and Graeber, economic modes can be divided into capitalist market economy (enclosure and exchange), power economy (de-enclosure and redistribution), gift economy (obligation to return and reciprocity), and concession economy (de-obligation to return). The concession economy reflects Graeber's baseline communism (from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs) and Deguchi's We-turn philosophy (the "I" as an individual has a "fundamental incapability" and the subject of physical action, responsibility, and freedom is "We" as a multi-agent system, including the "I"). In this study, we constructed novel network models for these four modes and compared their properties (cluster coefficient, graph density, reciprocity, assortativity, centrality, and Gini coefficient). From the calculation results, it became clear that the market economy leads to inequality; the power economy mitigates inequality but cannot eliminate it; the gift and concession economies lead to a healthy and equal economy; and the concession economy, free from the ties of obligation to return, is possible without guaranteeing reciprocity. We intend to promote the transformation from a capitalist economy to a concession economy through activities that disseminate baseline communism and the We-turn philosophy that promotes concession, that is, developing a cooperative platform to support concession through information technology and empirical research through fieldwork.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Subjective-objective policy making approach: Coupling of resident-values multiple regression analysis with value-indices, multi-agent-based simulation
Authors:
Misa Owa,
Junichi Miyakoshi,
Takeshi Kato
Abstract:
Given the concerns around the existing subjective and objective policy evaluation approaches, this study proposes a new combined subjective-objective policy evaluation approach to choose better policy that reflects the will of citizens and is backed up by objective facts. Subjective approaches, such as the Life Satisfaction Approach and the Contingent Valuation Method, convert subjectivity into ec…
▽ More
Given the concerns around the existing subjective and objective policy evaluation approaches, this study proposes a new combined subjective-objective policy evaluation approach to choose better policy that reflects the will of citizens and is backed up by objective facts. Subjective approaches, such as the Life Satisfaction Approach and the Contingent Valuation Method, convert subjectivity into economic value, raising the question whether a higher economic value really accords with what citizens want. Objective policy evaluation approaches, such as Evidence Based Policy Making and Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, do not take subjectivity into account, making it difficult to choose from diverse and pluralistic candidate policies. The proposed approach establishes a subjective target function based on a multiple regression analysis of the results of a residents questionnaire survey, and uses MABS to calculate the objective evaluation indices for a number of candidate policies. Next, a new subjective-objective coupling target function, combining the explanatory variables of the subjective target function with objective evaluation indices, is set up, optimized to select the preferred policies from numerous candidates. To evaluate this approach, we conducted a verification of renewable energy introduction policies at Takaharu Town in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. The results show a good potential for using a new subjective-objective coupling target function to select policies consistent with the residents values for well-being from 20,000 policy candidates for social, ecological, and economic values obtained in MABS. Using the new approach to compare several policies enables concrete expression of the will of stakeholders with diverse values, and contributes to constructive discussions and consensus-building.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Social Co-OS: Cyber-Human Social Co-Operating System
Authors:
Takeshi Kato,
Yasuyuki Kudo,
Junichi Miyakoshi,
Misa Owa,
Yasuhiro Asa,
Takashi Numata,
Ryuji Mine,
Hiroyuki Mizuno
Abstract:
The novel concept of a Cyber-Human Social System (CHSS) and a diverse and pluralistic 'mixed-life society' is proposed, wherein cyber and human societies commit to each other. This concept enhances the Cyber-Physical System (CPS), which is associated with the current Society 5.0, a social vision realised through the fusion of cyber (virtual) and physical (real) spaces following information society…
▽ More
The novel concept of a Cyber-Human Social System (CHSS) and a diverse and pluralistic 'mixed-life society' is proposed, wherein cyber and human societies commit to each other. This concept enhances the Cyber-Physical System (CPS), which is associated with the current Society 5.0, a social vision realised through the fusion of cyber (virtual) and physical (real) spaces following information society (Society 4.0 and Industry 4.0). Moreover, the CHSS enhances the Human-CPS, the Human-in-the-Loop CPS (HiLCPS), and the Cyber-Human System by intervening in individual behaviour pro-socially and supporting consensus building. As a form of architecture that embodies the CHSS concept, the Cyber-Human Social Co-Operating System (Social Co-OS) that combines cyber and human societies is shown. In this architecture, the cyber and human systems cooperate through the fast loop (operation and administration) and slow loop (consensus and politics). Furthermore, the technical content and current implementation of the basic functions of the Social Co-OS are described. These functions consist of individual behavioural diagnostics, interventions in the fast loop, group decision diagnostics and consensus building in the slow loop. Subsequently, this system will contribute to mutual aid communities and platform cooperatives.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2022; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Positionality-Weighted Aggregation Methods for Cumulative Voting
Authors:
Takeshi Kato,
Yasuhiro Asa,
Misa Owa
Abstract:
Respecting minority opinions is vital in solving social problems. However, minority opinions are often ignored in general majority rules. To build consensus on pluralistic values and make social choices that consider minority opinions, we propose aggregation methods that give weighting to the minority's positionality on cardinal cumulative voting. Based on quadratic and linear voting, we formulate…
▽ More
Respecting minority opinions is vital in solving social problems. However, minority opinions are often ignored in general majority rules. To build consensus on pluralistic values and make social choices that consider minority opinions, we propose aggregation methods that give weighting to the minority's positionality on cardinal cumulative voting. Based on quadratic and linear voting, we formulated three weighted aggregation methods that differ in the ratio of votes to cumulative points and the weighting of the minority to all members, and assuming that the distributions of votes follow normal distributions, we calculated the frequency distributions of the aggregation results. We found that minority opinions are more likely to be reflected proportionately to the average of the distribution in two of the above three methods. This implies that Sen and Gotoh's idea of considering the social position of unfortunate people on ordinal ranking in the welfare economics, was illustrated by weighting the minority's positionality on cardinal voting. In addition, it is possible to visualize the number and positionality of the minority from the analysis of the aggregation results. These results will be useful to promote mutual understanding between the majority and minority by interactively visualizing the contents of the proposed aggregation methods in the consensus-building process. With the further development of information technology, the consensus building based on big data will be necessary. We recommend the use of our proposed aggregation methods to make social choices for pluralistic values such as social, environmental, and economic.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2021; v1 submitted 19 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
