-
Voice to Vision: Enhancing Civic Decision-Making through Co-Designed Data Infrastructure
Authors:
Maggie Hughes,
Cassandra Overney,
Ashima Kamra,
Jasmin Tepale,
Elizabeth Hamby,
Mahmood Jasim,
Deb Roy
Abstract:
Trust and transparency in civic decision-making processes, like neighborhood planning, are eroding as community members frequently report sending feedback "into a void" without understanding how, or whether, their input influences outcomes. To address this gap, we introduce Voice to Vision, a sociotechnical system that bridges community voices and planning outputs through a structured yet flexible…
▽ More
Trust and transparency in civic decision-making processes, like neighborhood planning, are eroding as community members frequently report sending feedback "into a void" without understanding how, or whether, their input influences outcomes. To address this gap, we introduce Voice to Vision, a sociotechnical system that bridges community voices and planning outputs through a structured yet flexible data infrastructure and complementary interfaces for both community members and planners. Through a five-month iterative design process with 21 stakeholders and subsequent field evaluation involving 24 participants, we examine how this system facilitates shared understanding across the civic ecosystem. Our findings reveal that while planners value systematic sensemaking tools that find connections across diverse inputs, community members prioritize seeing themselves reflected in the process, discovering patterns within feedback, and observing the rigor behind decisions, while emphasizing the importance of actionable outcomes. We contribute insights into participatory design for civic contexts, a complete sociotechnical system with an interoperable data structure for civic decision-making, and empirical findings that inform how digital platforms can promote shared understanding among elected or appointed officials, planners, and community members by enhancing transparency and legitimacy.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Designing for Constructive Civic Communication: A Framework for Human-AI Collaboration in Community Engagement Processes
Authors:
Cassandra Overney
Abstract:
Community engagement processes form a critical foundation of democratic governance, yet frequently struggle with resource constraints, sensemaking challenges, and barriers to inclusive participation. These processes rely on constructive communication between public leaders and community organizations characterized by understanding, trust, respect, legitimacy, and agency. As artificial intelligence…
▽ More
Community engagement processes form a critical foundation of democratic governance, yet frequently struggle with resource constraints, sensemaking challenges, and barriers to inclusive participation. These processes rely on constructive communication between public leaders and community organizations characterized by understanding, trust, respect, legitimacy, and agency. As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly integrated into civic contexts, they offer promising capabilities to streamline resource-intensive workflows, reveal new insights in community feedback, translate complex information into accessible formats, and facilitate reflection across social divides. However, these same systems risk undermining democratic processes through accuracy issues, transparency gaps, bias amplification, and threats to human agency. In this paper, we examine how human-AI collaboration might address these risks and transform civic communication dynamics by identifying key communication pathways and proposing design considerations that maintain a high level of control over decision-making for both public leaders and communities while leveraging computer automation. By thoughtfully integrating AI to amplify human connection and understanding while safeguarding agency, community engagement processes can utilize AI to promote more constructive communication in democratic governance.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
BoundarEase: Fostering Constructive Community Engagement to Inform More Equitable Student Assignment Policies
Authors:
Cassandra Overney,
Cassandra Moe,
Alvin Chang,
Nabeel Gillani
Abstract:
School districts across the United States (US) play a pivotal role in shaping access to quality education through their student assignment policies -- most prominently, school attendance boundaries. Community engagement processes for changing such policies, however, are often opaque, cumbersome, and highly polarizing -- hampering equitable access to quality schools in ways that can perpetuate disp…
▽ More
School districts across the United States (US) play a pivotal role in shaping access to quality education through their student assignment policies -- most prominently, school attendance boundaries. Community engagement processes for changing such policies, however, are often opaque, cumbersome, and highly polarizing -- hampering equitable access to quality schools in ways that can perpetuate disparities in future life outcomes. In this paper, we describe a collaboration with a large US public school district serving nearly 150,000 students to design and evaluate a new sociotechnical system, "BoundarEase", for fostering more constructive community engagement around changing school attendance boundaries. Through a formative study with 16 community members, we first identify several frictions in existing community engagement processes, like individualistic over collective thinking; a failure to understand and empathize with the different ways policies might impact other community members; and challenges in understanding the impacts of boundary changes. These frictions inspire the design and development of BoundarEase, a web platform that allows community members to explore and offer feedback on potential boundaries. A user study with 12 community members reveals that BoundarEase prompts reflection among community members on how policies might impact families beyond their own, and increases transparency around the details of policy proposals. Our paper offers education researchers insights into the challenges and opportunities involved in community engagement for designing student assignment policies; human-computer interaction researchers a case study of how new sociotechnical systems might help mitigate polarization in local policymaking; and school districts a practical tool they might use to facilitate community engagement to foster more equitable student assignment policies.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
On the Relationship between Truth and Political Bias in Language Models
Authors:
Suyash Fulay,
William Brannon,
Shrestha Mohanty,
Cassandra Overney,
Elinor Poole-Dayan,
Deb Roy,
Jad Kabbara
Abstract:
Language model alignment research often attempts to ensure that models are not only helpful and harmless, but also truthful and unbiased. However, optimizing these objectives simultaneously can obscure how improving one aspect might impact the others. In this work, we focus on analyzing the relationship between two concepts essential in both language model alignment and political science: truthful…
▽ More
Language model alignment research often attempts to ensure that models are not only helpful and harmless, but also truthful and unbiased. However, optimizing these objectives simultaneously can obscure how improving one aspect might impact the others. In this work, we focus on analyzing the relationship between two concepts essential in both language model alignment and political science: truthfulness and political bias. We train reward models on various popular truthfulness datasets and subsequently evaluate their political bias. Our findings reveal that optimizing reward models for truthfulness on these datasets tends to result in a left-leaning political bias. We also find that existing open-source reward models (i.e., those trained on standard human preference datasets) already show a similar bias and that the bias is larger for larger models. These results raise important questions about the datasets used to represent truthfulness, potential limitations of aligning models to be both truthful and politically unbiased, and what language models capture about the relationship between truth and politics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2024; v1 submitted 8 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
All a-board: sharing educational data science research with school districts
Authors:
Nabeel Gillani,
Doug Beeferman,
Cassandra Overney,
Christine Vega-Pourheydarian,
Deb Roy
Abstract:
Educational data scientists often conduct research with the hopes of translating findings into lasting change through policy, civil society, or other channels. However, the bridge from research to practice can be fraught with sociopolitical frictions that impede, or altogether block, such translations -- especially when they are contentious or otherwise difficult to achieve. Focusing on one entren…
▽ More
Educational data scientists often conduct research with the hopes of translating findings into lasting change through policy, civil society, or other channels. However, the bridge from research to practice can be fraught with sociopolitical frictions that impede, or altogether block, such translations -- especially when they are contentious or otherwise difficult to achieve. Focusing on one entrenched educational equity issue in US public schools -- racial and ethnic segregation -- we conduct randomized email outreach experiments and surveys to explore how local school districts respond to algorithmically-generated school catchment areas ("attendance boundaries") designed to foster more diverse and integrated schools. Cold email outreach to approximately 4,320 elected school board members across over 800 school districts informing them of potential boundary changes reveals a large average open rate of nearly 40%, but a relatively small click-through rate of 2.5% to an interactive dashboard depicting such changes. Board members, however, appear responsive to different messaging techniques -- particularly those that dovetail issues of racial and ethnic diversity with other top-of-mind issues (like school capacity planning). On the other hand, media coverage of the research drives more dashboard engagement, especially in more segregated districts. A small but rich set of survey responses from school board and community members across several districts identify data and operational bottlenecks to implementing boundary changes to foster more diverse schools, but also share affirmative comments on the potential viability of such changes. Together, our findings may support educational data scientists in more effectively disseminating research that aims to bridge educational inequalities through systems-level change.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2023; v1 submitted 18 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Redrawing attendance boundaries to promote racial and ethnic diversity in elementary schools
Authors:
Nabeel Gillani,
Doug Beeferman,
Christine Vega-Pourheydarian,
Cassandra Overney,
Pascal Van Hentenryck,
Deb Roy
Abstract:
Most US school districts draw "attendance boundaries" to define catchment areas that assign students to schools near their homes, often recapitulating neighborhood demographic segregation in schools. Focusing on elementary schools, we ask: how much might we reduce school segregation by redrawing attendance boundaries? Combining parent preference data with methods from combinatorial optimization, w…
▽ More
Most US school districts draw "attendance boundaries" to define catchment areas that assign students to schools near their homes, often recapitulating neighborhood demographic segregation in schools. Focusing on elementary schools, we ask: how much might we reduce school segregation by redrawing attendance boundaries? Combining parent preference data with methods from combinatorial optimization, we simulate alternative boundaries for 98 US school districts serving over 3 million elementary-aged students, minimizing White/non-White segregation while mitigating changes to travel times and school sizes. Across districts, we observe a median 14% relative decrease in segregation, which we estimate would require approximately 20\% of students to switch schools and, surprisingly, a slight reduction in travel times. We release a public dashboard depicting these alternative boundaries (https://www.schooldiversity.org/) and invite both school boards and their constituents to evaluate their viability. Our results show the possibility of greater integration without significant disruptions for families.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
