-
Quantum-inspired tensor network for Earth science
Authors:
Soronzonbold Otgonbaatar,
Dieter Kranzlmüller
Abstract:
Deep Learning (DL) is one of many successful methodologies to extract informative patterns and insights from ever increasing noisy large-scale datasets (in our case, satellite images). However, DL models consist of a few thousand to millions of training parameters, and these training parameters require tremendous amount of electrical power for extracting informative patterns from noisy large-scale…
▽ More
Deep Learning (DL) is one of many successful methodologies to extract informative patterns and insights from ever increasing noisy large-scale datasets (in our case, satellite images). However, DL models consist of a few thousand to millions of training parameters, and these training parameters require tremendous amount of electrical power for extracting informative patterns from noisy large-scale datasets (e.g., computationally expensive). Hence, we employ a quantum-inspired tensor network for compressing trainable parameters of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) in Earth science. PINNs are DL models penalized by enforcing the law of physics; in particular, the law of physics is embedded in DL models. In addition, we apply tensor decomposition to HyperSpectral Images (HSIs) to improve their spectral resolution. A quantum-inspired tensor network is also the native formulation to efficiently represent and train quantum machine learning models on big datasets on GPU tensor cores. Furthermore, the key contribution of this paper is twofold: (I) we reduced a number of trainable parameters of PINNs by using a quantum-inspired tensor network, and (II) we improved the spectral resolution of remotely-sensed images by employing tensor decomposition. As a benchmark PDE, we solved Burger's equation. As practical satellite data, we employed HSIs of Indian Pine, USA and of Pavia University, Italy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Quantum Transfer Learning for Real-World, Small, and High-Dimensional Datasets
Authors:
Soronzonbold Otgonbaatar,
Gottfried Schwarz,
Mihai Datcu,
Dieter Kranzlmüller
Abstract:
Quantum machine learning (QML) networks promise to have some computational (or quantum) advantage for classifying supervised datasets (e.g., satellite images) over some conventional deep learning (DL) techniques due to their expressive power via their local effective dimension. There are, however, two main challenges regardless of the promised quantum advantage: 1) Currently available quantum bits…
▽ More
Quantum machine learning (QML) networks promise to have some computational (or quantum) advantage for classifying supervised datasets (e.g., satellite images) over some conventional deep learning (DL) techniques due to their expressive power via their local effective dimension. There are, however, two main challenges regardless of the promised quantum advantage: 1) Currently available quantum bits (qubits) are very small in number, while real-world datasets are characterized by hundreds of high-dimensional elements (i.e., features). Additionally, there is not a single unified approach for embedding real-world high-dimensional datasets in a limited number of qubits. 2) Some real-world datasets are too small for training intricate QML networks. Hence, to tackle these two challenges for benchmarking and validating QML networks on real-world, small, and high-dimensional datasets in one-go, we employ quantum transfer learning composed of a multi-qubit QML network, and a very deep convolutional network (a with VGG16 architecture) extracting informative features from any small, high-dimensional dataset. We use real-amplitude and strongly-entangling N-layer QML networks with and without data re-uploading layers as a multi-qubit QML network, and evaluate their expressive power quantified by using their local effective dimension; the lower the local effective dimension of a QML network, the better its performance on unseen data. Our numerical results show that the strongly-entangling N-layer QML network has a lower local effective dimension than the real-amplitude QML network and outperforms it on the hard-to-classify three-class labelling problem. In addition, quantum transfer learning helps tackle the two challenges mentioned above for benchmarking and validating QML networks on real-world, small, and high-dimensional datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2023; v1 submitted 16 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Coreset of Hyperspectral Images on Small Quantum Computer
Authors:
Soronzonbold Otgonbaatar,
Mihai Datcu,
Begüm Demir
Abstract:
Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed to analyze and process big Remote Sensing (RS) data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) promises to solve this QP problem more efficiently than a conventional computer. However, the D-Wave QA cannot solve directly the SVM due to its…
▽ More
Machine Learning (ML) techniques are employed to analyze and process big Remote Sensing (RS) data, and one well-known ML technique is a Support Vector Machine (SVM). An SVM is a quadratic programming (QP) problem, and a D-Wave quantum annealer (D-Wave QA) promises to solve this QP problem more efficiently than a conventional computer. However, the D-Wave QA cannot solve directly the SVM due to its very few input qubits. Hence, we use a coreset ("core of a dataset") of given EO data for training an SVM on this small D-Wave QA. The coreset is a small, representative weighted subset of an original dataset, and any training models generate competitive classes by using the coreset in contrast to by using its original dataset. We measured the closeness between an original dataset and its coreset by employing a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure. Moreover, we trained the SVM on the coreset data by using both a D-Wave QA and a conventional method. We conclude that the coreset characterizes the original dataset with very small KL divergence measure. In addition, we present our KL divergence results for demonstrating the closeness between our original data and its coreset. As practical RS data, we use Hyperspectral Image (HSI) of Indian Pine, USA.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2022; v1 submitted 10 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
