-
RustMC: Extending the GenMC stateless model checker to Rust
Authors:
Oliver Pearce,
Julien Lange,
Dan O'Keeffe
Abstract:
RustMC is a stateless model checker that enables verification of concurrent Rust programs. As both Rust and C/C++ compile to LLVM IR, RustMC builds on GenMC which provides a verification framework for LLVM IR. This enables the automatic verification of Rust code and any C/C++ dependencies. This tool paper presents the key challenges we addressed to extend GenMC. These challenges arise from Rust's…
▽ More
RustMC is a stateless model checker that enables verification of concurrent Rust programs. As both Rust and C/C++ compile to LLVM IR, RustMC builds on GenMC which provides a verification framework for LLVM IR. This enables the automatic verification of Rust code and any C/C++ dependencies. This tool paper presents the key challenges we addressed to extend GenMC. These challenges arise from Rust's unique compilation strategy and include intercepting threading operations, handling memory intrinsics and uninitialized accesses. Through case studies adapted from real-world programs, we demonstrate RustMC's effectiveness at finding concurrency bugs stemming from unsafe Rust code, FFI calls to C/C++, and incorrect use of atomic operations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Securing Monolithic Kernels using Compartmentalization
Authors:
Soo Yee Lim,
Sidhartha Agrawal,
Xueyuan Han,
David Eyers,
Dan O'Keeffe,
Thomas Pasquier
Abstract:
Monolithic operating systems, where all kernel functionality resides in a single, shared address space, are the foundation of most mainstream computer systems. However, a single flaw, even in a non-essential part of the kernel (e.g., device drivers), can cause the entire operating system to fall under an attacker's control. Kernel hardening techniques might prevent certain types of vulnerabilities…
▽ More
Monolithic operating systems, where all kernel functionality resides in a single, shared address space, are the foundation of most mainstream computer systems. However, a single flaw, even in a non-essential part of the kernel (e.g., device drivers), can cause the entire operating system to fall under an attacker's control. Kernel hardening techniques might prevent certain types of vulnerabilities, but they fail to address a fundamental weakness: the lack of intra-kernel security that safely isolates different parts of the kernel. We survey kernel compartmentalization techniques that define and enforce intra-kernel boundaries and propose a taxonomy that allows the community to compare and discuss future work. We also identify factors that complicate comparisons among compartmentalized systems, suggest new ways to compare future approaches with existing work meaningfully, and discuss emerging research directions.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
RansomClave: Ransomware Key Management using SGX
Authors:
Alpesh Bhudia,
Daniel O'Keeffe,
Daniele Sgandurra,
Darren Hurley-Smith
Abstract:
Modern ransomware often generate and manage cryptographic keys on the victim's machine, giving defenders an opportunity to capture exposed keys and recover encrypted data without paying the ransom. However, recent work has raised the possibility of future enclave-enhanced malware that could avoid such mitigations using emerging support for hardware-enforced secure enclaves in commodity CPUs. Nonet…
▽ More
Modern ransomware often generate and manage cryptographic keys on the victim's machine, giving defenders an opportunity to capture exposed keys and recover encrypted data without paying the ransom. However, recent work has raised the possibility of future enclave-enhanced malware that could avoid such mitigations using emerging support for hardware-enforced secure enclaves in commodity CPUs. Nonetheless, the practicality of such enclave-enhanced malware and its potential impact on all phases of the ransomware lifecyle remain unclear. Given the demonstrated capacity of ransomware authors to innovate in order to better extort their victims (e.g. through the adoption of untraceable virtual currencies and anonymity networks), it is important to better understand the risks involved and identify potential mitigations.
As a basis for comprehensive security and performance analysis of enclave-enhanced ransomware, we present RansomClave, a family of ransomware that securely manage their cryptographic keys using an enclave. We use RansomClave to explore the implications of enclave-enhanced ransomware for the key generation, encryption and key release phases of the ransomware lifecycle, and to identify potential limitations and mitigations.
We propose two plausible victim models and analyse, from an attacker's perspective, how RansomClave can protect cryptographic keys from each type of victim. We find that some existing mitigations are likely to be effective during the key generation and encryption phases, but that RansomClave enables new trustless key release schemes that could potentially improve attacker's profitability and, by extension, make enclaves an attractive target for future attackers.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
