-
Cross-Sensor Iris Recognition: LG4000-to-LG2200 Comparison
Authors:
Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin,
Lucian Stefanita Grigore,
Valentina Emilia Balas,
Cristina Madalina Noaica,
Ionut Axenie,
Justinian Popa,
Cristian Munteanu,
Victor Stroescu,
Ionut Manu,
Alexandru Herea,
Kartal Horasanli,
Iulia Maria Motoc
Abstract:
Cross-sensor comparison experimental results reported here show that the procedure defined and simulated during the Cross-Sensor Comparison Competition 2013 by our team for migrating / upgrading LG2200 based to LG4000 based biometric systems leads to better LG4000-to-LG2200 cross-sensor iris recognition results than previously reported, both in terms of user comfort and in terms of system safety.…
▽ More
Cross-sensor comparison experimental results reported here show that the procedure defined and simulated during the Cross-Sensor Comparison Competition 2013 by our team for migrating / upgrading LG2200 based to LG4000 based biometric systems leads to better LG4000-to-LG2200 cross-sensor iris recognition results than previously reported, both in terms of user comfort and in terms of system safety. On the other hand, LG2200-to-LG400 migration/upgrade procedure defined and implemented by us is applicable to solve interoperability issues between LG2200 based and LG4000 based systems, but also to other pairs of systems having the same shift in the quality of acquired images.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Examples of Artificial Perceptions in Optical Character Recognition and Iris Recognition
Authors:
Cristina M. Noaica,
Robert Badea,
Iulia M. Motoc,
Claudiu G. Ghica,
Alin C. Rosoiu,
Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin
Abstract:
This paper assumes the hypothesis that human learning is perception based, and consequently, the learning process and perceptions should not be represented and investigated independently or modeled in different simulation spaces. In order to keep the analogy between the artificial and human learning, the former is assumed here as being based on the artificial perception. Hence, instead of choosing…
▽ More
This paper assumes the hypothesis that human learning is perception based, and consequently, the learning process and perceptions should not be represented and investigated independently or modeled in different simulation spaces. In order to keep the analogy between the artificial and human learning, the former is assumed here as being based on the artificial perception. Hence, instead of choosing to apply or develop a Computational Theory of (human) Perceptions, we choose to mirror the human perceptions in a numeric (computational) space as artificial perceptions and to analyze the interdependence between artificial learning and artificial perception in the same numeric space, using one of the simplest tools of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, namely the perceptrons. As practical applications, we choose to work around two examples: Optical Character Recognition and Iris Recognition. In both cases a simple Turing test shows that artificial perceptions of the difference between two characters and between two irides are fuzzy, whereas the corresponding human perceptions are, in fact, crisp.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
Noise Influence on the Fuzzy-Linguistic Partitioning of Iris Code Space
Authors:
Iulia M. Motoc,
Cristina M. Noaica,
Robert Badea,
Claudiu G. Ghica
Abstract:
This paper analyses the set of iris codes stored or used in an iris recognition system as an f-granular space. The f-granulation is given by identifying in the iris code space the extensions of the fuzzy concepts wolves, goats, lambs and sheep (previously introduced by Doddington as 'animals' of the biometric menagerie) - which together form a partitioning of the iris code space. The main question…
▽ More
This paper analyses the set of iris codes stored or used in an iris recognition system as an f-granular space. The f-granulation is given by identifying in the iris code space the extensions of the fuzzy concepts wolves, goats, lambs and sheep (previously introduced by Doddington as 'animals' of the biometric menagerie) - which together form a partitioning of the iris code space. The main question here is how objective (stable / stationary) this partitioning is when the iris segments are subject to noisy acquisition. In order to prove that the f-granulation of iris code space with respect to the fuzzy concepts that define the biometric menagerie is unstable in noisy conditions (is sensitive to noise), three types of noise (localvar, motion blur, salt and pepper) have been alternatively added to the iris segments extracted from University of Bath Iris Image Database. The results of 180 exhaustive (all-to-all) iris recognition tests are presented and commented here.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
