Chronic Diseases Prediction Using ML
Authors:
Sri Varsha Mulakala,
G. Neeharika,
P. Vinay Kumar,
A. Bhargava Kiran
Abstract:
The recent increase in morbidity is primarily due to chronic diseases including Diabetes, Heart disease, Lung cancer, and brain tumours. The results for patients can be improved, and the financial burden on the healthcare system can be lessened, through the early detection and prevention of certain disorders. In this study, we built a machine-learning model for predicting the existence of numerous…
▽ More
The recent increase in morbidity is primarily due to chronic diseases including Diabetes, Heart disease, Lung cancer, and brain tumours. The results for patients can be improved, and the financial burden on the healthcare system can be lessened, through the early detection and prevention of certain disorders. In this study, we built a machine-learning model for predicting the existence of numerous diseases utilising datasets from various sources, including Kaggle, Dataworld, and the UCI repository, that are relevant to each of the diseases we intended to predict.
Following the acquisition of the datasets, we used feature engineering to extract pertinent features from the information, after which the model was trained on a training set and improved using a validation set. A test set was then used to assess the correctness of the final model. We provide an easy-to-use interface where users may enter the parameters for the selected ailment. Once the right model has been run, it will indicate whether the user has a certain ailment and offer suggestions for how to treat or prevent it.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
The CORSMAL benchmark for the prediction of the properties of containers
Authors:
Alessio Xompero,
Santiago Donaher,
Vladimir Iashin,
Francesca Palermo,
Gökhan Solak,
Claudio Coppola,
Reina Ishikawa,
Yuichi Nagao,
Ryo Hachiuma,
Qi Liu,
Fan Feng,
Chuanlin Lan,
Rosa H. M. Chan,
Guilherme Christmann,
Jyun-Ting Song,
Gonuguntla Neeharika,
Chinnakotla Krishna Teja Reddy,
Dinesh Jain,
Bakhtawar Ur Rehman,
Andrea Cavallaro
Abstract:
The contactless estimation of the weight of a container and the amount of its content manipulated by a person are key pre-requisites for safe human-to-robot handovers. However, opaqueness and transparencies of the container and the content, and variability of materials, shapes, and sizes, make this estimation difficult. In this paper, we present a range of methods and an open framework to benchmar…
▽ More
The contactless estimation of the weight of a container and the amount of its content manipulated by a person are key pre-requisites for safe human-to-robot handovers. However, opaqueness and transparencies of the container and the content, and variability of materials, shapes, and sizes, make this estimation difficult. In this paper, we present a range of methods and an open framework to benchmark acoustic and visual perception for the estimation of the capacity of a container, and the type, mass, and amount of its content. The framework includes a dataset, specific tasks and performance measures. We conduct an in-depth comparative analysis of methods that used this framework and audio-only or vision-only baselines designed from related works. Based on this analysis, we can conclude that audio-only and audio-visual classifiers are suitable for the estimation of the type and amount of the content using different types of convolutional neural networks, combined with either recurrent neural networks or a majority voting strategy, whereas computer vision methods are suitable to determine the capacity of the container using regression and geometric approaches. Classifying the content type and level using only audio achieves a weighted average F1-score up to 81% and 97%, respectively. Estimating the container capacity with vision-only approaches and estimating the filling mass with audio-visual multi-stage approaches reach up to 65% weighted average capacity and mass scores. These results show that there is still room for improvement on the design of new methods. These new methods can be ranked and compared on the individual leaderboards provided by our open framework.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.