HTML papers on arXiv -- why it is important, and how we made it happen
Authors:
Charles Frankston,
Jonathan Godfrey,
Shamsi Brinn,
Alison Hofer,
Mark Nazzaro
Abstract:
In October 2023, arXiv made HTML formatted papers available to readers. This was the exciting outcome of over a year of accessibility research and development with the scientific community. Currently, only 2.4% of research outputs meet accessibility guidelines. Informed by scientists who rely on assistive technology, our analysis demonstrates that offering HTML is the most impactful step arXiv can…
▽ More
In October 2023, arXiv made HTML formatted papers available to readers. This was the exciting outcome of over a year of accessibility research and development with the scientific community. Currently, only 2.4% of research outputs meet accessibility guidelines. Informed by scientists who rely on assistive technology, our analysis demonstrates that offering HTML is the most impactful step arXiv can take. Scientists need HTML now, and emphasize to not let perfect be the enemy of good enough. In this paper we share with you how arXiv is achieving HTML conversions from LaTeX now, and our plans for future improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
A framework for improving the accessibility of research papers on arXiv.org
Authors:
Shamsi Brinn,
Christopher Cameron,
David Fielding,
Charles Frankston,
Alison Fromme,
Peter Huang,
Mark Nazzaro,
Stephanie Orphan,
Steinn Sigurdsson,
Ryan Tay,
Miranda Yang,
Qianyu Zhou
Abstract:
The research content hosted by arXiv is not fully accessible to everyone due to disabilities and other barriers. This matters because a significant proportion of people have reading and visual disabilities, it is important to our community that arXiv is as open as possible, and if science is to advance, we need wide and diverse participation. In addition, we have mandates to become accessible, and…
▽ More
The research content hosted by arXiv is not fully accessible to everyone due to disabilities and other barriers. This matters because a significant proportion of people have reading and visual disabilities, it is important to our community that arXiv is as open as possible, and if science is to advance, we need wide and diverse participation. In addition, we have mandates to become accessible, and accessible content benefits everyone. In this paper, we will describe the accessibility problems with research, review current mitigations (and explain why they aren't sufficient), and share the results of our user research with scientists and accessibility experts. Finally, we will present arXiv's proposed next step towards more open science: offering HTML alongside existing PDF and TeX formats. An accessible HTML version of this paper is also available at https://arxiv.boxedpaper.com/sub/info/about/accessibility_research_report.html
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2024; v1 submitted 14 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
