-
Computing a 3-role assignment is polynomial-time solvable on complementary prisms
Authors:
Diane Castonguay,
Elisângela S. Dias,
Fernanda N. Mesquita,
Julliano R. Nascimento
Abstract:
A $r$-role assignment of a simple graph $G$ is an assignment of $r$ distinct roles to the vertices of $G$, such that two vertices with the same role have the same set of roles assigned to related vertices. Furthermore, a specific $r$-role assignment defines a role graph, in which the vertices are the distinct $r$ roles, and there is an edge between two roles whenever there are two related vertices…
▽ More
A $r$-role assignment of a simple graph $G$ is an assignment of $r$ distinct roles to the vertices of $G$, such that two vertices with the same role have the same set of roles assigned to related vertices. Furthermore, a specific $r$-role assignment defines a role graph, in which the vertices are the distinct $r$ roles, and there is an edge between two roles whenever there are two related vertices in the graph $G$ that correspond to these roles. We consider complementary prisms, which are graphs formed from the disjoint union of the graph with its respective complement, adding the edges of a perfect matching between their corresponding vertices. In this work, we characterize the complementary prisms that do not admit a $3$-role assignment. We highlight that all of them are complementary prisms of disconnected bipartite graphs. Moreover, using our findings, we show that the problem of deciding whether a complementary prism has a $3$-role assignment can be solved in polynomial time.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Perfect matching cuts partitioning a graph into complementary subgraphs
Authors:
Diane Castonguay,
Erika M. M. Coelho,
Hebert Coelho,
Julliano R. Nascimento,
Uéverton S. Souza
Abstract:
In Partition Into Complementary Subgraphs (Comp-Sub) we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$, and an edge set property $Π$, and asked whether $G$ can be decomposed into two graphs, $H$ and its complement $\overline{H}$, for some graph $H$, in such a way that the edge cut $[V(H),V(\overline{H})]$ satisfies the property $Π$. Motivated by previous work, we consider Comp-Sub($Π$) when the property…
▽ More
In Partition Into Complementary Subgraphs (Comp-Sub) we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$, and an edge set property $Π$, and asked whether $G$ can be decomposed into two graphs, $H$ and its complement $\overline{H}$, for some graph $H$, in such a way that the edge cut $[V(H),V(\overline{H})]$ satisfies the property $Π$. Motivated by previous work, we consider Comp-Sub($Π$) when the property $Π=\mathcal{PM}$ specifies that the edge cut of the decomposition is a perfect matching. We prove that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is GI-hard when the graph $G$ is $\{C_{k\geq 7}, \overline{C}_{k\geq 7} \}$-free. On the other hand, we show that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is polynomial-time solvable on $hole$-free graphs and on $P_5$-free graphs. Furthermore, we present characterizations of Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) on chordal, distance-hereditary, and extended $P_4$-laden graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
On the monophonic convexity in complementary prisms
Authors:
Neethu P. K.,
Ullas Chandran S. V.,
Julliano R. Nascimento
Abstract:
A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is \emph{monophonic convex} if $S$ contains all the vertices belonging to any induced path connecting two vertices of $S$. The cardinality of a maximum proper monophonic convex set of $G$ is called the \emph{monophonic convexity number} of $G$. The \emph{monophonic interval} of a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is the set $S$ together with every vertex belonging to…
▽ More
A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is \emph{monophonic convex} if $S$ contains all the vertices belonging to any induced path connecting two vertices of $S$. The cardinality of a maximum proper monophonic convex set of $G$ is called the \emph{monophonic convexity number} of $G$. The \emph{monophonic interval} of a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is the set $S$ together with every vertex belonging to any induced path connecting two vertices of $S$. The cardinality of a minimum set $S \subseteq V(G)$ whose monophonic interval is $V(G)$ is called the \emph{monophonic number} of $G$. The \emph{monophonic convex hull} of a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ is the smallest monophonic convex set containing $S$ in $G$. The cardinality of a minimum set $S \subseteq V(G)$ whose monophonic convex hull is $V(G)$ is called the \emph{monophonic hull number} of $G$. The \emph{complementary prism} $\GG$ of $G$ is obtained from the disjoint union of $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between them. In this work, we determine the monophonic convexity number, the monophonic number, and the monophonic hull number of the complementary prisms of all graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023; v1 submitted 22 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Linear-time Algorithms for Eliminating Claws in Graphs
Authors:
Flavia Bonomo-Braberman,
Julliano R. Nascimento,
Fabiano S. Oliveira,
Uéverton S. Souza,
Jayme L. Szwarcfiter
Abstract:
Since many NP-complete graph problems have been shown polynomial-time solvable when restricted to claw-free graphs, we study the problem of determining the distance of a given graph to a claw-free graph, considering vertex elimination as measure. CLAW-FREE VERTEX DELETION (CFVD) consists of determining the minimum number of vertices to be removed from a graph such that the resulting graph is claw-…
▽ More
Since many NP-complete graph problems have been shown polynomial-time solvable when restricted to claw-free graphs, we study the problem of determining the distance of a given graph to a claw-free graph, considering vertex elimination as measure. CLAW-FREE VERTEX DELETION (CFVD) consists of determining the minimum number of vertices to be removed from a graph such that the resulting graph is claw-free. Although CFVD is NP-complete in general and recognizing claw-free graphs is still a challenge, where the current best algorithm for a graph $G$ has the same running time of the best algorithm for matrix multiplication, we present linear-time algorithms for CFVD on weighted block graphs and weighted graphs with bounded treewidth. Furthermore, we show that this problem can be solved in linear time by a simpler algorithm on forests, and we determine the exact values for full $k$-ary trees. On the other hand, we show that CLAW-FREE VERTEX DELETION is NP-complete even when the input graph is a split graph. We also show that the problem is hard to approximate within any constant factor better than $2$, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
A note on the convexity number for complementary prisms
Authors:
Diane Castonguay,
Erika M. M. Coelho,
Hebert Coelho,
Julliano R. Nascimento
Abstract:
In the geodetic convexity, a set of vertices $S$ of a graph $G$ is $\textit{convex}$ if all vertices belonging to any shortest path between two vertices of $S$ lie in $S$. The cardinality $con(G)$ of a maximum proper convex set $S$ of $G$ is the $\textit{convexity number}$ of $G$. The $\textit{complementary prism}$ $G\overline{G}$ of a graph $G$ arises from the disjoint union of the graph $G$ and…
▽ More
In the geodetic convexity, a set of vertices $S$ of a graph $G$ is $\textit{convex}$ if all vertices belonging to any shortest path between two vertices of $S$ lie in $S$. The cardinality $con(G)$ of a maximum proper convex set $S$ of $G$ is the $\textit{convexity number}$ of $G$. The $\textit{complementary prism}$ $G\overline{G}$ of a graph $G$ arises from the disjoint union of the graph $G$ and $\overline{G}$ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of $G$ and $\overline{G}$. In this work, we we prove that the decision problem related to the convexity number is NP-complete even restricted to complementary prisms, we determine $con(G\overline{G})$ when $G$ is disconnected or $G$ is a cograph, and we present a lower bound when $diam(G) \neq 3$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2019; v1 submitted 21 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
On the Geodetic Hull Number of Complementary Prisms
Authors:
Erika M. M. Coelho,
Hebert Coelho,
Julliano R. Nascimento,
Jayme L. Szwarcfiter
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a finite, simple, and undirected graph and let $S$ be a set of vertices of $G$. In the geodetic convexity, a set of vertices $S$ of a graph $G$ is convex if all vertices belonging to any shortest path between two vertices of $S$ lie in $S$. The convex hull $H(S)$ of $S$ is the smallest convex set containing $S$. If $H(S) = V(G)$, then $S$ is a hull set. The cardinality $h(G)$ of a minim…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a finite, simple, and undirected graph and let $S$ be a set of vertices of $G$. In the geodetic convexity, a set of vertices $S$ of a graph $G$ is convex if all vertices belonging to any shortest path between two vertices of $S$ lie in $S$. The convex hull $H(S)$ of $S$ is the smallest convex set containing $S$. If $H(S) = V(G)$, then $S$ is a hull set. The cardinality $h(G)$ of a minimum hull set of $G$ is the hull number of $G$. The complementary prism $G\overline{G}$ of a graph $G$ arises from the disjoint union of the graph $G$ and $\overline{G}$ by adding the edges of a perfect matching between the corresponding vertices of $G$ and $\overline{G}$. Motivated by previous work, we determine and present lower and upper bounds on the hull number of complementary prisms of trees, disconnected graphs and cographs. We also show that the hull number on complementary prisms cannot be limited in the geodetic convexity, unlike the $P_3$-convexity.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
