Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground
Authors:
Alexander Martin Mussgnug
Abstract:
Recent research illustrates how AI can be developed and deployed in a manner detached from the concrete social context of application. By abstracting from the contexts of AI application, practitioners also disengage from the distinct normative structures that govern them. Building upon Helen Nissenbaum's framework of contextual integrity, I illustrate how disregard for contextual norms can threate…
▽ More
Recent research illustrates how AI can be developed and deployed in a manner detached from the concrete social context of application. By abstracting from the contexts of AI application, practitioners also disengage from the distinct normative structures that govern them. Building upon Helen Nissenbaum's framework of contextual integrity, I illustrate how disregard for contextual norms can threaten the integrity of a context with often decisive ethical implications. I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms. Echoing a persistent undercurrent in technology ethics of understanding emerging technologies as uncharted moral territory, certain approaches to AI ethics can promote a notion of AI as a novel and distinct realm for ethical deliberation, norm setting, and virtue cultivation. This narrative of AI as new ethical ground, however, can come at the expense of practitioners, policymakers and ethicists engaging with already established norms and virtues that were gradually cultivated to promote successful and responsible practice within concrete social contexts. In response, I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation. Engaging also with emerging foundation models, I advocate for a moderately conservative approach to the ethics of AI that prioritizes the responsible and considered integration of AI within established social contexts and their respective normative structures.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2025; v1 submitted 6 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
A Philosophy of Data
Authors:
Alexander M. Mussgnug
Abstract:
We argue that while this discourse on data ethics is of critical importance, it is missing one fundamental point: If more and more efforts in business, government, science, and our daily lives are data-driven, we should pay more attention to what exactly we are driven by. Therefore, we need more debate on what fundamental properties constitute data. In the first section of the paper, we work from…
▽ More
We argue that while this discourse on data ethics is of critical importance, it is missing one fundamental point: If more and more efforts in business, government, science, and our daily lives are data-driven, we should pay more attention to what exactly we are driven by. Therefore, we need more debate on what fundamental properties constitute data. In the first section of the paper, we work from the fundamental properties necessary for statistical computation to a definition of statistical data. We define a statistical datum as the coming together of substantive and numerical properties and differentiate between qualitative and quantitative data. Subsequently, we qualify our definition by arguing that for data to be practically useful, it needs to be commensurable in a manner that reveals meaningful differences that allow for the generation of relevant insights through statistical methodologies. In the second section, we focus on what our conception of data can contribute to the discourse on data ethics and beyond. First, we hold that the need for useful data to be commensurable rules out an understanding of properties as fundamentally unique or equal. Second, we argue that practical concerns lead us to increasingly standardize how we operationalize a substantive property; in other words, how we formalize the relationship between the substantive and numerical properties of data. Thereby, we also standardize the interpretation of a property. With our increasing reliance on data and data technologies, these two characteristics of data affect our collective conception of reality. Statistical data's exclusion of the fundamentally unique and equal influences our perspective on the world, and the standardization of substantive properties can be viewed as profound ontological practice, entrenching ever more pervasive interpretations of phenomena in our everyday lives.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2020; v1 submitted 15 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
