Towards personalised assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm structural integrity
Authors:
Mostafa Jamshidian,
Adam Wittek,
Hozan Mufty,
Geert Maleux,
Inge Fourneau,
Elke R. Gizewski,
Eva Gassner,
Alexander Loizides,
Maximilian Lutz,
Florian K. Enzmann,
Donatien Le Liepvre,
Florian Bernard,
Ludovic Minvielle,
Antoine Fondanèche,
Karol Miller
Abstract:
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition involving the permanent dilation of the aorta, often detected incidentally through imaging for some other condition. The standard clinical approach to managing AAA follows a one-size-fits-all model based on aneurysm size and growth rate, leading to underestimation or overestimation of rupture risk in individual patients. The widely st…
▽ More
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition involving the permanent dilation of the aorta, often detected incidentally through imaging for some other condition. The standard clinical approach to managing AAA follows a one-size-fits-all model based on aneurysm size and growth rate, leading to underestimation or overestimation of rupture risk in individual patients. The widely studied stress-based rupture risk estimation using computational biomechanics requires wall strength information. However, non-invasive methods for local patient-specific wall strength measurement have not yet been developed. Recently, we introduced an image-based approach for patient-specific, in vivo, non-invasive AAA kinematic analysis using time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images to measure wall strain throughout the cardiac cycle. In the present study, we integrated wall tension computation and strain measurement to develop a novel measure of local structural integrity of AAA wall - Relative Structural Integrity Index (RSII), independent of material properties and thickness of the wall and conditions of blood pressure measurement. Our methods provide a visual map of AAA wall structural integrity for individual patients using only their medical images and blood pressure data. We applied our methods to twelve patients. Additionally, we compared our measure of structural integrity of aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal aortas. Our results show similar values of the wall structural integrity measure across the patients, indicating the reliability of our methods. In line with experimental observations reported in the literature, our analysis revealed that localized low stiffness areas are primarily found in the most dilated AAA regions. Our results clearly demonstrate that the AAA wall is stiffer than the non-aneurysmal aorta.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2025; v1 submitted 13 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
Towards Full Automation of Geometry Extraction for Biomechanical Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; Neural Network-Based versus Classical Methodologies
Authors:
Farah Alkhatib,
Mostafa Jamshidian,
Donatien Le Liepvre,
Florian Bernard,
Ludovic Minvielle,
Antoine Fondanèche,
Elke R. Gizewski,
Eva Gassner,
Alexander Loizides,
Maximilian Lutz,
Florian Enzmann,
Hozan Mufty,
Inge Fourneau,
Adam Wittek,
Karol Miller
Abstract:
Background: For the clinical adoption of stress-based rupture risk estimation in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), a fully automated pipeline, from clinical imaging to biomechanical stress computation, is essential. To this end, we investigated the impact of AI-based image segmentation methods on stress computation results in the walls of AAAs. We compared wall stress distributions and magnitudes…
▽ More
Background: For the clinical adoption of stress-based rupture risk estimation in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), a fully automated pipeline, from clinical imaging to biomechanical stress computation, is essential. To this end, we investigated the impact of AI-based image segmentation methods on stress computation results in the walls of AAAs. We compared wall stress distributions and magnitudes calculated from geometry models obtained from classical semi-automated segmentation versus automated neural network-based segmentation. Method: 16 different AAA contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images were semi-automatically segmented by an analyst, taking between 15 and 40 minutes of human effort per patient, depending on image quality. The same images were automatically segmented using PRAEVAorta2 commercial software by NUREA (https://www.nurea-soft.com/), developed based on artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and automatically post-processed with an in-house MATLAB code, requiring only 1-2 minutes of computer time per patient. Aneurysm wall stress calculations were automatically performed using the BioPARR software (https://bioparr.mech.uwa.edu.au/). Results: Compared to the classical semi-automated segmentation, the automatic neural network-based segmentation leads to equivalent stress distributions, and slightly higher peak and 99th percentile maximum principal stress values. However, our statistical analysis indicated that the differences in AAA wall stress obtained using the two segmentation methods are not statistically significant and fall well within the typical range of inter-analyst and intra-analyst variability. Conclusions: Our findings are a steppingstone toward a fully automated pipeline for biomechanical analysis of AAAs, starting with CT scans and concluding with wall stress assessment.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2025; v1 submitted 11 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
