Artificial Intelligence to Assess Dental Findings from Panoramic Radiographs -- A Multinational Study
Authors:
Yin-Chih Chelsea Wang,
Tsao-Lun Chen,
Shankeeth Vinayahalingam,
Tai-Hsien Wu,
Chu Wei Chang,
Hsuan Hao Chang,
Hung-Jen Wei,
Mu-Hsiung Chen,
Ching-Chang Ko,
David Anssari Moin,
Bram van Ginneken,
Tong Xi,
Hsiao-Cheng Tsai,
Min-Huey Chen,
Tzu-Ming Harry Hsu,
Hye Chou
Abstract:
Dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) are widely used in clinical practice for comprehensive oral assessment but present challenges due to overlapping structures and time constraints in interpretation.
This study aimed to establish a solid baseline for the AI-automated assessment of findings in DPRs by developing, evaluating an AI system, and comparing its performance with that of human readers ac…
▽ More
Dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) are widely used in clinical practice for comprehensive oral assessment but present challenges due to overlapping structures and time constraints in interpretation.
This study aimed to establish a solid baseline for the AI-automated assessment of findings in DPRs by developing, evaluating an AI system, and comparing its performance with that of human readers across multinational data sets.
We analyzed 6,669 DPRs from three data sets (the Netherlands, Brazil, and Taiwan), focusing on 8 types of dental findings. The AI system combined object detection and semantic segmentation techniques for per-tooth finding identification. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). AI generalizability was tested across data sets, and performance was compared with human dental practitioners.
The AI system demonstrated comparable or superior performance to human readers, particularly +67.9% (95% CI: 54.0%-81.9%; p < .001) sensitivity for identifying periapical radiolucencies and +4.7% (95% CI: 1.4%-8.0%; p = .008) sensitivity for identifying missing teeth. The AI achieved a macro-averaged AUC-ROC of 96.2% (95% CI: 94.6%-97.8%) across 8 findings. AI agreements with the reference were comparable to inter-human agreements in 7 of 8 findings except for caries (p = .024). The AI system demonstrated robust generalization across diverse imaging and demographic settings and processed images 79 times faster (95% CI: 75-82) than human readers.
The AI system effectively assessed findings in DPRs, achieving performance on par with or better than human experts while significantly reducing interpretation time. These results highlight the potential for integrating AI into clinical workflows to improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, and patient management.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
