-
Co-design Optimization of Moving Parts for Compliance and Collision Avoidance
Authors:
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Morad Behandish
Abstract:
Design requirements for moving parts in mechanical assemblies are typically specified in terms of interactions with other parts. Some are purely kinematic (e.g., pairwise collision avoidance) while others depend on physics and material properties (e.g., deformation under loads). Kinematic design methods and physics-based shape/topology optimization (SO/TO) deal separately with these requirements.…
▽ More
Design requirements for moving parts in mechanical assemblies are typically specified in terms of interactions with other parts. Some are purely kinematic (e.g., pairwise collision avoidance) while others depend on physics and material properties (e.g., deformation under loads). Kinematic design methods and physics-based shape/topology optimization (SO/TO) deal separately with these requirements. They rarely talk to each other as the former uses set algebra and group theory while the latter requires discretizing and solving differential equations. Hence, optimizing a moving part based on physics typically relies on either neglecting or pruning kinematic constraints in advance, e.g., by restricting the design domain to a collision-free space using an unsweep operation. In this paper, we show that TO can be used to co-design two or more parts in relative motion to simultaneously satisfy physics-based criteria and collision avoidance. We restrict our attention to maximizing linear-elastic stiffness while penalizing collision measures aggregated in time. We couple the TO loops for two parts in relative motion so that the evolution of each part's shape is accounted for when penalizing collision for the other part. The collision measures are computed by a correlation functional that can be discretized by left- and right-multiplying the shape design variables by a pre-computed matrix that depends solely on the motion. This decoupling is key to making the computations scalable for TO iterations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach with 2D and 3D examples.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
PATO: Producibility-Aware Topology Optimization using Deep Learning for Metal Additive Manufacturing
Authors:
Naresh S. Iyer,
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Sathyanarayanan Raghavan,
Yang Jiao,
Erva Ulu,
Morad Behandish,
Saigopal Nelaturi,
Dean M. Robinson
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose PATO-a producibility-aware topology optimization (TO) framework to help efficiently explore the design space of components fabricated using metal additive manufacturing (AM), while ensuring manufacturability with respect to cracking. Specifically, parts fabricated through Laser Powder Bed Fusion are prone to defects such as warpage or cracking due to high residual stress…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose PATO-a producibility-aware topology optimization (TO) framework to help efficiently explore the design space of components fabricated using metal additive manufacturing (AM), while ensuring manufacturability with respect to cracking. Specifically, parts fabricated through Laser Powder Bed Fusion are prone to defects such as warpage or cracking due to high residual stress values generated from the steep thermal gradients produced during the build process. Maturing the design for such parts and planning their fabrication can span months to years, often involving multiple handoffs between design and manufacturing engineers. PATO is based on the a priori discovery of crack-free designs, so that the optimized part can be built defect-free at the outset. To ensure that the design is crack free during optimization, producibility is explicitly encoded within the standard formulation of TO, using a crack index. Multiple crack indices are explored and using experimental validation, maximum shear strain index (MSSI) is shown to be an accurate crack index. Simulating the build process is a coupled, multi-physics computation and incorporating it in the TO loop can be computationally prohibitive. We leverage the current advances in deep convolutional neural networks and present a high-fidelity surrogate model based on an Attention-based U-Net architecture to predict the MSSI values as a spatially varying field over the part's domain. Further, we employ automatic differentiation to directly compute the gradient of maximum MSSI with respect to the input design variables and augment it with the performance-based sensitivity field to optimize the design while considering the trade-off between weight, manufacturability, and functionality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through benchmark studies in 3D as well as experimental validation.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Topology Optimization for Manufacturing with Accessible Support Structures
Authors:
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Morad Behandish,
Saigopal Nelaturi
Abstract:
Metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes often fabricate a near-net shape that includes the as-designed part as well as the sacrificial support structures that need to be machined away by subtractive manufacturing (SM), for instance multi-axis machining. Thus, although AM is capable of generating highly complex parts, the limitations of SM due to possible collision between the milling tool and…
▽ More
Metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes often fabricate a near-net shape that includes the as-designed part as well as the sacrificial support structures that need to be machined away by subtractive manufacturing (SM), for instance multi-axis machining. Thus, although AM is capable of generating highly complex parts, the limitations of SM due to possible collision between the milling tool and the workpiece can render an optimized part non-manufacturable. We present a systematic approach to topology optimization (TO) of parts for AM followed by SM to ensure removability of support structures, while optimizing the part's performance. A central idea is to express the producibility of the part from the near-net shape in terms of accessibility of every support structure point using a given set of cutting tool assemblies and fixturing orientations. Our approach does not impose any artificial constraints on geometric complexity of the part, support structures, machining tools, and fixturing devices. We extend the notion of inaccessibility measure field (IMF) to support structures to identify the inaccessible points and capture their contributions to non-manufacturability by a continuous spatial field. IMF is then augmented to the sensitivity field to guide the TO towards a manufacturable design. The approach enables efficient and effective design space exploration by finding nontrivial complex designs whose near-net shape can be 3D printed and post-processed for support removal by machining with a custom set of tools and fixtures. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on nontrivial examples in 2D and 3D.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Optimizing Build Orientation for Support Removal using Multi-Axis Machining
Authors:
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Morad Behandish,
Saigopal Nelaturi
Abstract:
Parts fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM) are often fabricated first as a near-net shape, a combination of intended nominal geometry and sacrificial support structures, which need to be removed in a subsequent post-processing stage using subtractive manufacturing (SM). In this paper, we present a framework for optimizing the build orientation with respect to removability of support structure…
▽ More
Parts fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM) are often fabricated first as a near-net shape, a combination of intended nominal geometry and sacrificial support structures, which need to be removed in a subsequent post-processing stage using subtractive manufacturing (SM). In this paper, we present a framework for optimizing the build orientation with respect to removability of support structures. In particular, given a general multi-axis machining setup and sampled build orientations, we define a Pareto-optimality criterion based on the total support volume and the "secluded" support volume defined as the support volume that is not accessible by a given set of machining tools. Since total support volume mainly depends on the build orientation and the secluded volume is dictated by the machining setup, in many cases the two objectives are competing and their trade-off needs to be taken into account. The accessibility analysis relies on the inaccessibility measure field (IMF), which is a continuous field in the Euclidean space that quantifies the inaccessibility of each point given a collection of tools and fixturing devices. The value of IMF at each point indicates the minimum possible volumetric collision between objects in relative motion including the part, fixtures, and the tools, over all possible tool orientations and sharp points on the tool. We also propose an automated support removal planning algorithm based on IMF, where a sequence of actions are provided in terms of the fixturing devices, cutting tools, and tool orientation at each step. In our approach, each step is chosen based on the maximal removable volume to iteratively remove accessible supports. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through benchmark examples in 2D and realistic examples in 3D.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Topology Optimization with Accessibility Constraint for Multi-Axis Machining
Authors:
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Morad Behandish,
Saigopal Nelaturi
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a topology optimization (TO) framework to enable automated design of mechanical components while ensuring the result can be manufactured using multi-axis machining. Although TO improves the part's performance, the as-designed model is often geometrically too complex to be machined and the as-manufactured model can significantly vary due to machining constraints that are n…
▽ More
In this paper, we present a topology optimization (TO) framework to enable automated design of mechanical components while ensuring the result can be manufactured using multi-axis machining. Although TO improves the part's performance, the as-designed model is often geometrically too complex to be machined and the as-manufactured model can significantly vary due to machining constraints that are not accounted for during TO. In other words, many of the optimized design features cannot be accessed by a machine tool without colliding with the part (or fixtures). The subsequent post-processing to make the part machinable with the given setup requires trial-and-error without guarantees on preserving the optimized performance. Our proposed approach is based on the well-established accessibility analysis formulation using convolutions in configuration space that is extensively used in spatial planning and robotics. We define an 'inaccessibility measure field' (IMF) over the design domain to identify non-manufacturable features and quantify their contribution to non-manufacturability. The IMF is used to penalize the sensitivity field of performance objectives and constraints to prevent formation of inaccessible regions. Unlike existing discrete formulations, our IMF provides a continuous spatial field that is desirable for TO convergence. Our approach applies to arbitrary geometric complexity of the part, tools, and fixtures, and is highly parallelizable on multi-core architecture. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on benchmark and realistic examples in 2D and 3D. We also show that it is possible to directly construct manufacturing plans for the optimized designs based on the accessibility information.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Exploring Feasible Design Spaces for Heterogeneous Constraints
Authors:
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Morad Behandish,
Saigopal Nelaturi
Abstract:
We demonstrate an approach of exploring design spaces to simultaneously satisfy kinematics- and physics-based requirements. We present a classification of constraints and solvers to enable postponing optimization as far down the design workflow as possible. The solvers are organized into two broad classes of design space 'pruning' and 'exploration' by considering the types of constraints they can…
▽ More
We demonstrate an approach of exploring design spaces to simultaneously satisfy kinematics- and physics-based requirements. We present a classification of constraints and solvers to enable postponing optimization as far down the design workflow as possible. The solvers are organized into two broad classes of design space 'pruning' and 'exploration' by considering the types of constraints they can satisfy. We show that pointwise constraints define feasible design subspaces that can be represented and computed as first-class entities by their maximal feasible elements. The design space is pruned upfront by intersecting maximal elements, without premature optimization. To solve for other constraints, we apply topology optimization (TO), starting from the pruned feasible space. The optimization is steered by a topological sensitivity field (TSF) that measures the global changes in violation of constraints with respect to local topological punctures. The TSF for global objective functions is augmented with TSF for global constraints, and penalized/filtered to incorporate local constraints, including set constraints converted to differentiable (in)equality constraints. We demonstrate application of the proposed workflow to nontrivial examples in design and manufacturing. Among other examples, we show how to explore pruned design spaces via TO to simultaneously satisfy physics-based constraints (e.g., minimize compliance and mass) as well as kinematics-based constraints (e.g., maximize accessibility for machining).
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2019; v1 submitted 1 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
A Classification of Topological Discrepancies in Additive Manufacturing
Authors:
Morad Behandish,
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Saigopal Nelaturi
Abstract:
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables enormous freedom for design of complex structures. However, the process-dependent limitations that result in discrepancies between as-designed and as-manufactured shapes are not fully understood. The tradeoffs between infinitely many different ways to approximate a design by a manufacturable replica are even harder to characterize. To support design for AM (DfAM…
▽ More
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables enormous freedom for design of complex structures. However, the process-dependent limitations that result in discrepancies between as-designed and as-manufactured shapes are not fully understood. The tradeoffs between infinitely many different ways to approximate a design by a manufacturable replica are even harder to characterize. To support design for AM (DfAM), one has to quantify local discrepancies introduced by AM processes, identify the detrimental deviations (if any) to the original design intent, and prescribe modifications to the design and/or process parameters to countervail their effects. Our focus in this work will be on topological analysis. There is ample evidence in many applications that preserving local topology (e.g., connectivity of beams in a lattice) is important even when slight geometric deviations can be tolerated. We first present a generic method to characterize local topological discrepancies due to material under- and over-deposition in AM, and show how it captures various types of defects in the as-manufactured structures. We use this information to systematically modify the as-manufactured outcomes within the limitations of available 3D printer resolution(s), which often comes at the expense of introducing more geometric deviations (e.g., thickening a beam to avoid disconnection). We validate the effectiveness of the method on 3D examples with nontrivial topologies such as lattice structures and foams.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2019; v1 submitted 27 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Automatic Support Removal for Additive Manufacturing Post Processing
Authors:
Saigopal Nelaturi,
Morad Behandish,
Amir M. Mirzendehdel,
Johan de Kleer
Abstract:
An additive manufacturing (AM) process often produces a {\it near-net} shape that closely conforms to the intended design to be manufactured. It sometimes contains additional support structure (also called scaffolding), which has to be removed in post-processing. We describe an approach to automatically generate process plans for support removal using a multi-axis machining instrument. The goal is…
▽ More
An additive manufacturing (AM) process often produces a {\it near-net} shape that closely conforms to the intended design to be manufactured. It sometimes contains additional support structure (also called scaffolding), which has to be removed in post-processing. We describe an approach to automatically generate process plans for support removal using a multi-axis machining instrument. The goal is to fracture the contact regions between each support component and the part, and to do it in the most cost-effective order while avoiding collisions with evolving near-net shape, including the remaining support components. A recursive algorithm identifies a maximal collection of support components whose connection regions to the part are accessible as well as the orientations at which they can be removed at a given round. For every such region, the accessible orientations appear as a 'fiber' in the collision-free space of the evolving near-net shape and the tool assembly. To order the removal of accessible supports, the algorithm constructs a search graph whose edges are weighted by the Riemannian distance between the fibers. The least expensive process plan is obtained by solving a traveling salesman problem (TSP) over the search graph. The sequence of configurations obtained by solving TSP is used as the input to a motion planner that finds collision free paths to visit all accessible features. The resulting part without the support structure can then be finished using traditional machining to produce the intended design. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through benchmark examples in 3D.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2019; v1 submitted 27 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
