Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Mirzendehdel, A M

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. Co-design Optimization of Moving Parts for Compliance and Collision Avoidance

    Authors: Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Morad Behandish

    Abstract: Design requirements for moving parts in mechanical assemblies are typically specified in terms of interactions with other parts. Some are purely kinematic (e.g., pairwise collision avoidance) while others depend on physics and material properties (e.g., deformation under loads). Kinematic design methods and physics-based shape/topology optimization (SO/TO) deal separately with these requirements.… ▽ More

    Submitted 31 March, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

    Journal ref: Computer-Aided Design (2023)

  2. arXiv:2112.04552  [pdf, other

    cs.CE cs.AI cs.LG

    PATO: Producibility-Aware Topology Optimization using Deep Learning for Metal Additive Manufacturing

    Authors: Naresh S. Iyer, Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Sathyanarayanan Raghavan, Yang Jiao, Erva Ulu, Morad Behandish, Saigopal Nelaturi, Dean M. Robinson

    Abstract: In this paper, we propose PATO-a producibility-aware topology optimization (TO) framework to help efficiently explore the design space of components fabricated using metal additive manufacturing (AM), while ensuring manufacturability with respect to cracking. Specifically, parts fabricated through Laser Powder Bed Fusion are prone to defects such as warpage or cracking due to high residual stress… ▽ More

    Submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

  3. arXiv:2108.02829  [pdf, other

    cs.CE

    Topology Optimization for Manufacturing with Accessible Support Structures

    Authors: Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Morad Behandish, Saigopal Nelaturi

    Abstract: Metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes often fabricate a near-net shape that includes the as-designed part as well as the sacrificial support structures that need to be machined away by subtractive manufacturing (SM), for instance multi-axis machining. Thus, although AM is capable of generating highly complex parts, the limitations of SM due to possible collision between the milling tool and… ▽ More

    Submitted 5 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

  4. Optimizing Build Orientation for Support Removal using Multi-Axis Machining

    Authors: Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Morad Behandish, Saigopal Nelaturi

    Abstract: Parts fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM) are often fabricated first as a near-net shape, a combination of intended nominal geometry and sacrificial support structures, which need to be removed in a subsequent post-processing stage using subtractive manufacturing (SM). In this paper, we present a framework for optimizing the build orientation with respect to removability of support structure… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

    Comments: Special issue on Computational Fabrication

    Journal ref: Computers and Graphics (2021)

  5. Topology Optimization with Accessibility Constraint for Multi-Axis Machining

    Authors: Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Morad Behandish, Saigopal Nelaturi

    Abstract: In this paper, we present a topology optimization (TO) framework to enable automated design of mechanical components while ensuring the result can be manufactured using multi-axis machining. Although TO improves the part's performance, the as-designed model is often geometrically too complex to be machined and the as-manufactured model can significantly vary due to machining constraints that are n… ▽ More

    Submitted 16 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

  6. Exploring Feasible Design Spaces for Heterogeneous Constraints

    Authors: Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Morad Behandish, Saigopal Nelaturi

    Abstract: We demonstrate an approach of exploring design spaces to simultaneously satisfy kinematics- and physics-based requirements. We present a classification of constraints and solvers to enable postponing optimization as far down the design workflow as possible. The solvers are organized into two broad classes of design space 'pruning' and 'exploration' by considering the types of constraints they can… ▽ More

    Submitted 9 July, 2019; v1 submitted 1 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: Special Issue on Generative Design

    Journal ref: Journal of Computer-Aided Design, 2019

  7. A Classification of Topological Discrepancies in Additive Manufacturing

    Authors: Morad Behandish, Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Saigopal Nelaturi

    Abstract: Additive manufacturing (AM) enables enormous freedom for design of complex structures. However, the process-dependent limitations that result in discrepancies between as-designed and as-manufactured shapes are not fully understood. The tradeoffs between infinitely many different ways to approximate a design by a manufacturable replica are even harder to characterize. To support design for AM (DfAM… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 May, 2019; v1 submitted 27 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

    Comments: Special Issue on symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling (SPM'2019)

    Journal ref: Journal of Computer-Aided Design, 2019

  8. Automatic Support Removal for Additive Manufacturing Post Processing

    Authors: Saigopal Nelaturi, Morad Behandish, Amir M. Mirzendehdel, Johan de Kleer

    Abstract: An additive manufacturing (AM) process often produces a {\it near-net} shape that closely conforms to the intended design to be manufactured. It sometimes contains additional support structure (also called scaffolding), which has to be removed in post-processing. We describe an approach to automatically generate process plans for support removal using a multi-axis machining instrument. The goal is… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 May, 2019; v1 submitted 27 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

    Comments: Special Issue on symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling (SPM'2019)

    Journal ref: Journal of Computer-Aided Design, 2019