Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Minsky, N H
-
Discriminating Defense Against DDoS Attacks; a Novel Approach
Authors:
Naftaly H. Minsky
Abstract:
A recent paper (circa 2020) by Osterwile et al., entitled "21 Years of Distributed Denial of Service: A Call to Action", states: "We are falling behind in the war against distributed denial-of-service attacks. Unless we act now, the future of the Internet could be at stake." And an earlier (circa 2007) paper by Peng et al. states: "a key challenge for the defense [against DDoS attacks] is how to d…
▽ More
A recent paper (circa 2020) by Osterwile et al., entitled "21 Years of Distributed Denial of Service: A Call to Action", states: "We are falling behind in the war against distributed denial-of-service attacks. Unless we act now, the future of the Internet could be at stake." And an earlier (circa 2007) paper by Peng et al. states: "a key challenge for the defense [against DDoS attacks] is how to discriminate legitimate requests for service from malicious access attempts." This challenge has not been met yet, which is, arguably, a major reason for the dire situation described by Osterwile et al. -- thirteen years later. This paper attempts to meet an approximation to this challenge, by enabling a a site to define the kind of messages that it considers important, and by introducing an unambiguous criterion of discrimination between messages that a given site considers important, and all other messages sent to it. Two anti-DDoS mechanisms based on this criterion are introduced in this paper. One of these relies on lightweight support by routers; and the other one does not.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Establishing Global Policies over Decentralized Online Social Networks
Authors:
Zhe Wang,
Naftaly H. Minsky
Abstract:
Conventional online social networks (OSNs) are implemented in a centralized manner. Although centralization is a convenient way for implementing OSNs, it has several well known drawbacks. Chief among them are the risks they pose to the security and privacy of the information maintained by the OSN; and the loss of control over the information contributed by individual members.
These concerns prom…
▽ More
Conventional online social networks (OSNs) are implemented in a centralized manner. Although centralization is a convenient way for implementing OSNs, it has several well known drawbacks. Chief among them are the risks they pose to the security and privacy of the information maintained by the OSN; and the loss of control over the information contributed by individual members.
These concerns prompted several attempts to create decentralized OSNs, or DOSNs. The basic idea underlying these attempts, is that each member of a social network keeps its data under its own control, instead of surrendering it to a central host; providing access to it to other members of the OSN according to its own access-control policy. Unfortunately all existing DOSN projects have a very serious limitation. Namely, they are unable to subject the membership of a DOSN, and the interaction between its members, to any global policy.
We adopt the decentralization idea underlying DOSNs, complementing it with a means for specifying and enforcing a wide range of policies over the membership of a social community, and over the interaction between its disparate distributed members. And we do so in a scalable fashion.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
