-
Algorand
Authors:
Jing Chen,
Silvio Micali
Abstract:
A public ledger is a tamperproof sequence of data that can be read and augmented by everyone. Public ledgers have innumerable and compelling uses. They can secure, in plain sight, all kinds of transactions ---such as titles, sales, and payments--- in the exact order in which they occur. Public ledgers not only curb corruption, but also enable very sophisticated applications ---such as cryptocurren…
▽ More
A public ledger is a tamperproof sequence of data that can be read and augmented by everyone. Public ledgers have innumerable and compelling uses. They can secure, in plain sight, all kinds of transactions ---such as titles, sales, and payments--- in the exact order in which they occur. Public ledgers not only curb corruption, but also enable very sophisticated applications ---such as cryptocurrencies and smart contracts. They stand to revolutionize the way a democratic society operates. As currently implemented, however, they scale poorly and cannot achieve their potential.
Algorand is a truly democratic and efficient way to implement a public ledger. Unlike prior implementations based on proof of work, it requires a negligible amount of computation, and generates a transaction history that will not "fork" with overwhelmingly high probability.
Algorand is based on (a novel and super fast) message-passing Byzantine agreement.
For concreteness, we shall describe Algorand only as a money platform.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2017; v1 submitted 5 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Johnson-Lindenstrauss Compression with Neuroscience-Based Constraints
Authors:
Zeyuan Allen-Zhu,
Rati Gelashvili,
Silvio Micali,
Nir Shavit
Abstract:
Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) matrices implemented by sparse random synaptic connections are thought to be a prime candidate for how convergent pathways in the brain compress information. However, to date, there is no complete mathematical support for such implementations given the constraints of real neural tissue. The fact that neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory implies that every so imple…
▽ More
Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) matrices implemented by sparse random synaptic connections are thought to be a prime candidate for how convergent pathways in the brain compress information. However, to date, there is no complete mathematical support for such implementations given the constraints of real neural tissue. The fact that neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory implies that every so implementable JL matrix must be sign-consistent (i.e., all entries in a single column must be either all non-negative or all non-positive), and the fact that any given neuron connects to a relatively small subset of other neurons implies that the JL matrix had better be sparse.
We construct sparse JL matrices that are sign-consistent, and prove that our construction is essentially optimal. Our work answers a mathematical question that was triggered by earlier work and is necessary to justify the existence of JL compression in the brain, and emphasizes that inhibition is crucial if neurons are to perform efficient, correlation-preserving compression.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
Knightian Analysis of the Vickrey Mechanism
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We analyze the Vickrey mechanism for auctions of multiple identical goods when the players have both Knightian uncertainty over their own valuations and incomplete preferences. In this model, the Vickrey mechanism is no longer dominant-strategy, and we prove that all dominant-strategy mechanisms are inadequate. However, we also prove that, in undominated strategies, the social welfare produced by…
▽ More
We analyze the Vickrey mechanism for auctions of multiple identical goods when the players have both Knightian uncertainty over their own valuations and incomplete preferences. In this model, the Vickrey mechanism is no longer dominant-strategy, and we prove that all dominant-strategy mechanisms are inadequate. However, we also prove that, in undominated strategies, the social welfare produced by the Vickrey mechanism in the worst case is not only very good, but also essentially optimal.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2015; v1 submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Knightian Robustness of Single-Parameter Domains
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We consider players that have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
We prove a ``robustness'' theorem for Knightian players in single-parameter domains: every mechanism that is weakly dominant-st…
▽ More
We consider players that have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
We prove a ``robustness'' theorem for Knightian players in single-parameter domains: every mechanism that is weakly dominant-strategy truthful for classical players continues to be well-behaved for Knightian players that choose undominated strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Knightian Analysis of the VCG Mechanism in Unrestricted Combinatorial Auctions
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
The VCG mechanism guarantees very high social welfare both in single- and multi-good auctions, so long as Knig…
▽ More
We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
The VCG mechanism guarantees very high social welfare both in single- and multi-good auctions, so long as Knightian players do not select strategies that are dominated. With such Knightian players, however, we prove that the VCG mechanism guarantees very poor social welfare in unrestricted combinatorial auctions.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Knightian Robustness from Regret Minimization
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
We analyze the social-welfare performance of the VCG mechanism, for unrestricted combinatorial auctions, when…
▽ More
We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn.
We analyze the social-welfare performance of the VCG mechanism, for unrestricted combinatorial auctions, when Knightian players that either (a) choose a regret-minimizing strategy, or (b) resort to regret minimization only to refine further their own sets of undominated strategies, if needed. We prove that this performance is very good.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2014; v1 submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Bridging Utility Maximization and Regret Minimization
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We relate the strategy sets that a player ends up with after refining his own strategies according to two very different models of rationality: namely, utility maximization and regret minimization.
We relate the strategy sets that a player ends up with after refining his own strategies according to two very different models of rationality: namely, utility maximization and regret minimization.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Knightian Auctions
Authors:
Alessandro Chiesa,
Silvio Micali,
Zeyuan Allen Zhu
Abstract:
We study single-good auctions in a setting where each player knows his own valuation only within a constant multiplicative factor δ in (0,1), and the mechanism designer knows δ. The classical notions of implementation in dominant strategies and implementation in undominated strategies are naturally extended to this setting, but their power is vastly different.
On the negative side, we prove that…
▽ More
We study single-good auctions in a setting where each player knows his own valuation only within a constant multiplicative factor δ in (0,1), and the mechanism designer knows δ. The classical notions of implementation in dominant strategies and implementation in undominated strategies are naturally extended to this setting, but their power is vastly different.
On the negative side, we prove that no dominant-strategy mechanism can guarantee social welfare that is significantly better than that achievable by assigning the good to a random player.
On the positive side, we provide tight upper and lower bounds for the fraction of the maximum social welfare achievable in undominated strategies, whether deterministically or probabilistically.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.