-
GPT-4o System Card
Authors:
OpenAI,
:,
Aaron Hurst,
Adam Lerer,
Adam P. Goucher,
Adam Perelman,
Aditya Ramesh,
Aidan Clark,
AJ Ostrow,
Akila Welihinda,
Alan Hayes,
Alec Radford,
Aleksander Mądry,
Alex Baker-Whitcomb,
Alex Beutel,
Alex Borzunov,
Alex Carney,
Alex Chow,
Alex Kirillov,
Alex Nichol,
Alex Paino,
Alex Renzin,
Alex Tachard Passos,
Alexander Kirillov,
Alexi Christakis
, et al. (395 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
GPT-4o is an autoregressive omni model that accepts as input any combination of text, audio, image, and video, and generates any combination of text, audio, and image outputs. It's trained end-to-end across text, vision, and audio, meaning all inputs and outputs are processed by the same neural network. GPT-4o can respond to audio inputs in as little as 232 milliseconds, with an average of 320 mil…
▽ More
GPT-4o is an autoregressive omni model that accepts as input any combination of text, audio, image, and video, and generates any combination of text, audio, and image outputs. It's trained end-to-end across text, vision, and audio, meaning all inputs and outputs are processed by the same neural network. GPT-4o can respond to audio inputs in as little as 232 milliseconds, with an average of 320 milliseconds, which is similar to human response time in conversation. It matches GPT-4 Turbo performance on text in English and code, with significant improvement on text in non-English languages, while also being much faster and 50\% cheaper in the API. GPT-4o is especially better at vision and audio understanding compared to existing models. In line with our commitment to building AI safely and consistent with our voluntary commitments to the White House, we are sharing the GPT-4o System Card, which includes our Preparedness Framework evaluations. In this System Card, we provide a detailed look at GPT-4o's capabilities, limitations, and safety evaluations across multiple categories, focusing on speech-to-speech while also evaluating text and image capabilities, and measures we've implemented to ensure the model is safe and aligned. We also include third-party assessments on dangerous capabilities, as well as discussion of potential societal impacts of GPT-4o's text and vision capabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Self-Supervised Pretraining Improves Self-Supervised Pretraining
Authors:
Colorado J. Reed,
Xiangyu Yue,
Ani Nrusimha,
Sayna Ebrahimi,
Vivek Vijaykumar,
Richard Mao,
Bo Li,
Shanghang Zhang,
Devin Guillory,
Sean Metzger,
Kurt Keutzer,
Trevor Darrell
Abstract:
While self-supervised pretraining has proven beneficial for many computer vision tasks, it requires expensive and lengthy computation, large amounts of data, and is sensitive to data augmentation. Prior work demonstrates that models pretrained on datasets dissimilar to their target data, such as chest X-ray models trained on ImageNet, underperform models trained from scratch. Users that lack the r…
▽ More
While self-supervised pretraining has proven beneficial for many computer vision tasks, it requires expensive and lengthy computation, large amounts of data, and is sensitive to data augmentation. Prior work demonstrates that models pretrained on datasets dissimilar to their target data, such as chest X-ray models trained on ImageNet, underperform models trained from scratch. Users that lack the resources to pretrain must use existing models with lower performance. This paper explores Hierarchical PreTraining (HPT), which decreases convergence time and improves accuracy by initializing the pretraining process with an existing pretrained model. Through experimentation on 16 diverse vision datasets, we show HPT converges up to 80x faster, improves accuracy across tasks, and improves the robustness of the self-supervised pretraining process to changes in the image augmentation policy or amount of pretraining data. Taken together, HPT provides a simple framework for obtaining better pretrained representations with less computational resources.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2021; v1 submitted 23 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
SelfAugment: Automatic Augmentation Policies for Self-Supervised Learning
Authors:
Colorado J Reed,
Sean Metzger,
Aravind Srinivas,
Trevor Darrell,
Kurt Keutzer
Abstract:
A common practice in unsupervised representation learning is to use labeled data to evaluate the quality of the learned representations. This supervised evaluation is then used to guide critical aspects of the training process such as selecting the data augmentation policy. However, guiding an unsupervised training process through supervised evaluations is not possible for real-world data that doe…
▽ More
A common practice in unsupervised representation learning is to use labeled data to evaluate the quality of the learned representations. This supervised evaluation is then used to guide critical aspects of the training process such as selecting the data augmentation policy. However, guiding an unsupervised training process through supervised evaluations is not possible for real-world data that does not actually contain labels (which may be the case, for example, in privacy sensitive fields such as medical imaging). Therefore, in this work we show that evaluating the learned representations with a self-supervised image rotation task is highly correlated with a standard set of supervised evaluations (rank correlation $> 0.94$). We establish this correlation across hundreds of augmentation policies, training settings, and network architectures and provide an algorithm (SelfAugment) to automatically and efficiently select augmentation policies without using supervised evaluations. Despite not using any labeled data, the learned augmentation policies perform comparably with augmentation policies that were determined using exhaustive supervised evaluations.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2021; v1 submitted 16 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
