-
Beyond Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Autonomous Motivation in User Experience
Authors:
Daniel Bennett,
Elisa Mekler
Abstract:
Motivation and autonomy are fundamental concepts in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), yet in User Experience (UX) research they have remained surprisingly peripheral. We draw on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to analyse autonomous and non-autonomous patterns of motivation in 497 interaction experiences. Using latent profile analysis, we identify 5 distinct patterns of motivation in technology use…
▽ More
Motivation and autonomy are fundamental concepts in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), yet in User Experience (UX) research they have remained surprisingly peripheral. We draw on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to analyse autonomous and non-autonomous patterns of motivation in 497 interaction experiences. Using latent profile analysis, we identify 5 distinct patterns of motivation in technology use -- "motivational profiles" -- associated with significant differences in need satisfaction, affect, and usability. Users' descriptions of these experiences also reveal qualitative differences between profiles: from intentional, purposive engagement, to compulsive use which users themselves consider unhealthy. Our results complicate exclusively positive notions of intrinsic motivation, and clarify how extrinsic motivation can contribute to positive UX. Based on these findings we identify open questions for UX and SDT, addressing "hedonic amotivation" -- negative experiences in activities which are intrinsically motivated but not otherwise valued -- and "design for internalisation" -- scaffolding healthy and sustainable patterns of engagement over time.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned Paradigms
Authors:
April Tyack,
Elisa D. Mekler
Abstract:
Self-determination theory (SDT), a psychological theory of human motivation, is a prominent paradigm in human-computer interaction (HCI) research on games. However, our prior literature review observed a trend towards shallow applications of the theory. This follow-up work takes a broader view -- examining SDT scholarship on games, a wider corpus of SDT-based HCI games research (N=259), and perspe…
▽ More
Self-determination theory (SDT), a psychological theory of human motivation, is a prominent paradigm in human-computer interaction (HCI) research on games. However, our prior literature review observed a trend towards shallow applications of the theory. This follow-up work takes a broader view -- examining SDT scholarship on games, a wider corpus of SDT-based HCI games research (N=259), and perspectives from a games industry practitioner conference -- to help explain current applications of SDT. Our findings suggest that perfunctory applications of the theory in HCI games research originate in part from within SDT scholarship on games, which itself exhibits limited engagement with theoretical tenets. Against this backdrop, we unpack the popularity of SDT in HCI games research and identify conditions underlying the theory's current use as an oft-unquestioned paradigm. Finally, we outline avenues for more productive SDT-informed games research and consider ways towards more intentional practices of theory use in HCI.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
How to write a CHI paper (asking for a friend)
Authors:
Raquel Robinson,
Alberto Alvarez,
Elisa Mekler
Abstract:
Writing and genre conventions are extant to any scientific community, and CHI is no different. In this paper, we present the early phases of an AI tool we created called KITSUNE, which supports authors in placing their work into the format of a CHI paper, taking into account many conventions that are ever-present in CHI papers. We describe the development of the tool with the intent to promote dis…
▽ More
Writing and genre conventions are extant to any scientific community, and CHI is no different. In this paper, we present the early phases of an AI tool we created called KITSUNE, which supports authors in placing their work into the format of a CHI paper, taking into account many conventions that are ever-present in CHI papers. We describe the development of the tool with the intent to promote discussion around how writing conventions are upheld and unquestioned by the CHI community, and how this translates to the work produced. In addition, we bring up questions surrounding how the introduction of LLMs into academic writing fundamentally change how conventions will be upheld now and in the future
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
How does HCI Understand Human Autonomy and Agency?
Authors:
Dan Bennett,
Oussama Metatla,
Anne Roudaut,
Elisa Mekler
Abstract:
Human agency and autonomy have always been fundamental concepts in HCI. New developments, including ubiquitous AI and the growing integration of technologies into our lives, make these issues ever pressing, as technologies increase their ability to influence our behaviours and values. However, in HCI understandings of autonomy and agency remain ambiguous. Both concepts are used to describe a wide…
▽ More
Human agency and autonomy have always been fundamental concepts in HCI. New developments, including ubiquitous AI and the growing integration of technologies into our lives, make these issues ever pressing, as technologies increase their ability to influence our behaviours and values. However, in HCI understandings of autonomy and agency remain ambiguous. Both concepts are used to describe a wide range of phenomena pertaining to sense-of-control, material independence, and identity. It is unclear to what degree these understandings are compatible, and how they support the development of research programs and practical interventions. We address this by reviewing 30 years of HCI research on autonomy and agency to identify current understandings, open issues, and future directions. From this analysis, we identify ethical issues, and outline key themes to guide future work. We also articulate avenues for advancing clarity and specificity around these concepts, and for coordinating integrative work across different HCI communities.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023; v1 submitted 29 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Adorned in Memes: Exploring the Adoption of Social Wearables in Nordic Student Culture
Authors:
Felix Anand Epp,
Anna Kantosalo,
Nehal Jain,
Andrés Lucero,
Elisa D Mekler
Abstract:
Social wearables promise to augment and enhance social interactions. However, despite two decades of HCI research on wearables, we are yet to see widespread adoption of social wearables into everyday life. More in-situ investigations into the social dynamics and cultural practices afforded by wearing interactive technology are needed to understand the drivers and barriers to adoption. To this end,…
▽ More
Social wearables promise to augment and enhance social interactions. However, despite two decades of HCI research on wearables, we are yet to see widespread adoption of social wearables into everyday life. More in-situ investigations into the social dynamics and cultural practices afforded by wearing interactive technology are needed to understand the drivers and barriers to adoption. To this end, we study social wearables in the context of Nordic student culture and the students' practice of adorning boiler suits. Through a co-creation process, we designed Digi Merkki, a personalised interactive clothing patch. In a two-week elicitation diary study, we captured how 16 students adopted Digi Merkki into their social practices. We found that Digi Merkki afforded a variety of social interaction strategies, including sharing, spamming, and stealing pictures, which supported meaning-making and community-building. Based on our findings, we articulate Memetic Expression as a strong concept for designing social wearables.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022; v1 submitted 2 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Evaluating User Experiences in Mixed Reality
Authors:
Dmitry Alexandrovsky,
Susanne Putze,
Valentin Schwind,
Elisa D. Mekler,
Jan David Smeddinck,
Denise Kahl,
Antonio Krüger,
Rainer Malaka
Abstract:
Measure user experience in MR (i.e., AR/VR) user studies is essential. Researchers apply a wide range of measuring methods using objective (e.g., biosignals, time logging), behavioral (e.g., gaze direction, movement amplitude), and subjective (e.g., standardized questionnaires) metrics. Many of these measurement instruments were adapted from use-cases outside of MR but have not been validated for…
▽ More
Measure user experience in MR (i.e., AR/VR) user studies is essential. Researchers apply a wide range of measuring methods using objective (e.g., biosignals, time logging), behavioral (e.g., gaze direction, movement amplitude), and subjective (e.g., standardized questionnaires) metrics. Many of these measurement instruments were adapted from use-cases outside of MR but have not been validated for usage in MR experiments. However, researchers are faced with various challenges and design alternatives when measuring immersive experiences. These challenges become even more diverse when running out-of-the lab studies. Measurement methods of VR experience recently received much attention. For example, research has started embedding questionnaires in the VE for various applications, allowing users to stay closer to the ongoing experience while filling out the survey. However, there is a diversity in the interaction methods and practices on how the assessment procedure is conducted. This diversity in methods underlines a missing shared agreement of standardized measurement tools for VR experiences. AR research strongly orients on the research methods from VR, e.g., using the same type of subjective questionnaires. However, some crucial technical differences require careful considerations during the evaluation. This workshop at CHI 2021 provides a foundation to exchange expertise and address challenges and opportunities of research methods in MR user studies. By this, our workshop launches a discussion of research methods that should lead to standardizing assessment methods in MR user studies. The outcomes of the workshop will be aggregated into a collective special issue journal article.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.