SafeSoftDR: A Library to Enable Software-based Diverse Redundancy for Safety-Critical Tasks
Authors:
Fabio Mazzocchetti,
Sergi Alcaide,
Francisco Bas,
Pedro Benedicte,
Guillem Cabo,
Feng Chang,
Francisco Fuentes,
Jaume Abella
Abstract:
Applications with safety requirements have become ubiquitous nowadays and can be found in edge devices of all kinds. However, microcontrollers in those devices, despite offering moderate performance by implementing multicores and cache hierarchies, may fail to offer adequate support to implement some safety measures needed for the highest integrity levels, such as lockstepped execution to avoid so…
▽ More
Applications with safety requirements have become ubiquitous nowadays and can be found in edge devices of all kinds. However, microcontrollers in those devices, despite offering moderate performance by implementing multicores and cache hierarchies, may fail to offer adequate support to implement some safety measures needed for the highest integrity levels, such as lockstepped execution to avoid so-called common cause failures (i.e., a fault affecting redundant components causing the same error in all of them). To respond to this limitation, an approach based on a software monitor enforcing some sort of software-based lockstepped execution across cores has been proposed recently, providing a proof of concept. This paper presents SafeSoftDR, a library providing a standard interface to deploy software-based lockstepped execution across non-natively lockstepped cores relieving end-users from having to manage the burden to create redundant processes, copying input/output data, and performing result comparison. Our library has been tested on x86-based Linux and is currently being integrated on top of an open-source RISC-V platform targeting safety-related applications, hence offering a convenient environment for safety-critical applications.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
Performance Analysis and Optimization Opportunities for NVIDIA Automotive GPUs
Authors:
Hamid Tabani,
Fabio Mazzocchetti,
Pedro Benedicte,
Jaume Abella,
Francisco J. Cazorla
Abstract:
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving (AD) bring unprecedented performance requirements for automotive systems. Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) based platforms have been deployed with the aim of meeting these requirements, being NVIDIA Jetson TX2 and its high-performance successor, NVIDIA AGX Xavier, relevant representatives. However, to what extent high-performance GPU co…
▽ More
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving (AD) bring unprecedented performance requirements for automotive systems. Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) based platforms have been deployed with the aim of meeting these requirements, being NVIDIA Jetson TX2 and its high-performance successor, NVIDIA AGX Xavier, relevant representatives. However, to what extent high-performance GPU configurations are appropriate for ADAS and AD workloads remains as an open question.
This paper analyzes this concern and provides valuable insights on this question by modeling two recent automotive NVIDIA GPU-based platforms, namely TX2 and AGX Xavier. In particular, our work assesses their microarchitectural parameters against relevant benchmarks, identifying GPU setups delivering increased performance within a similar cost envelope, or decreasing hardware costs while preserving original performance levels. Overall, our analysis identifies opportunities for the optimization of automotive GPUs to further increase system efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
