Showing 1–22 of 22 results for author: Mande, N S

Hardness of Finding Kings and Strong Kings

Authors: Ziad Ismaili Alaoui, Nikhil S. Mande

Abstract: A king in a directed graph is a vertex $v$ such that every other vertex is reachable from $v$ via a path of length at most $2$. It is well known that every tournament (a complete graph where each edge has a direction) has at least one king. Our contributions in this work are: - We show that the query complexity of determining existence of a king in arbitrary $n$-vertex digraphs is $Θ(n^2)$. This… ▽ More A king in a directed graph is a vertex $v$ such that every other vertex is reachable from $v$ via a path of length at most $2$. It is well known that every tournament (a complete graph where each edge has a direction) has at least one king. Our contributions in this work are: - We show that the query complexity of determining existence of a king in arbitrary $n$-vertex digraphs is $Θ(n^2)$. This is in stark contrast to the case where the input is a tournament, where Shen, Sheng, and Wu [SICOMP'03] showed that a king can be found in $O(n^{3/2})$ queries. - In an attempt to increase the "fairness" in the definition of tournament winners, Ho and Chang [IPL'03] defined a strong king to be a king $k$ such that, for every $v$ that dominates $k$, the number of length-$2$ paths from $k$ to $v$ is strictly larger than the number of length-$2$ paths from $v$ to $k$. We show that the query complexity of finding a strong king in a tournament is $Θ(n^2)$. This answers a question of Biswas, Jayapaul, Raman, and Satti [DAM'22] in the negative. A key component in our proofs is the design of specific tournaments where every vertex is a king, and analyzing certain properties of these tournaments. We feel these constructions and properties are independently interesting and may lead to more interesting results about tournament solutions. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Query Complexity with Unknowns

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Karteek Sreenivasaiah

Abstract: We initiate the study of a new model of query complexity of Boolean functions where, in addition to 0 and 1, the oracle can answer queries with ``unknown''. The query algorithm is expected to output the function value if it can be conclusively determined by the partial information gathered, and it must output ``unknown'' if not. We formalize this model by using Kleene's strong logic of indetermina… ▽ More We initiate the study of a new model of query complexity of Boolean functions where, in addition to 0 and 1, the oracle can answer queries with ``unknown''. The query algorithm is expected to output the function value if it can be conclusively determined by the partial information gathered, and it must output ``unknown'' if not. We formalize this model by using Kleene's strong logic of indeterminacy on three variables to capture unknowns. We call this model the `u-query model'. We relate the query complexity of functions in the new u-query model with their analogs in the standard query model. We show an explicit function that is exponentially harder in the u-query model than in the usual query model. We give sufficient conditions for a function to have u-query complexity asymptotically the same as its query complexity. Using u-query analogs of the combinatorial measures of sensitivity, block sensitivity, and certificate complexity, we show that deterministic, randomized, and quantum u-query complexities of all total Boolean functions are polynomially related to each other, just as in the usual query models. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Quantum Sabotage Complexity

Authors: Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro

Abstract: Given a Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$, the goal in the usual query model is to compute $f$ on an unknown input $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ while minimizing the number of queries to $x$. One can also consider a "distinguishing" problem denoted by $f_{\mathsf{sab}}$: given an input $x \in f^{-1}(0)$ and an input $y \in f^{-1}(1)$, either all differing locations are replaced by a $*$, or all differi… ▽ More Given a Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$, the goal in the usual query model is to compute $f$ on an unknown input $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ while minimizing the number of queries to $x$. One can also consider a "distinguishing" problem denoted by $f_{\mathsf{sab}}$: given an input $x \in f^{-1}(0)$ and an input $y \in f^{-1}(1)$, either all differing locations are replaced by a $*$, or all differing locations are replaced by $\dagger$, and an algorithm's goal is to identify which of these is the case while minimizing the number of queries. Ben-David and Kothari [ToC'18] introduced the notion of randomized sabotage complexity of a Boolean function to be the zero-error randomized query complexity of $f_{\mathsf{sab}}$. A natural follow-up question is to understand $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})$, the quantum query complexity of $f_{\mathsf{sab}}$. In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of this. The following are our main results: $\bullet\;\;$ If we have additional query access to $x$ and $y$, then $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})=O(\min\{\mathsf{Q}(f),\sqrt{n}\})$. $\bullet\;\;$ If an algorithm is also required to output a differing index of a 0-input and a 1-input, then $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})=O(\min\{\mathsf{Q}(f)^{1.5},\sqrt{n}\})$. $\bullet\;\;$ $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}}) = Ω(\sqrt{\mathsf{fbs}(f)})$, where $\mathsf{fbs}(f)$ denotes the fractional block sensitivity of $f$. By known results, along with the results in the previous bullets, this implies that $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})$ is polynomially related to $\mathsf{Q}(f)$. $\bullet\;\;$ The bound above is easily seen to be tight for standard functions such as And, Or, Majority and Parity. We show that when $f$ is the Indexing function, $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})=Θ(\mathsf{fbs}(f))$, ruling out the possibility that $\mathsf{Q}(f_{\mathsf{sab}})=Θ(\sqrt{\mathsf{fbs}(f)})$ for all $f$. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Comments: 21 pages, 1 figure

MSC Class: 68Q09 ACM Class: F.1.3; F.2.3

Lower bounds for quantum-inspired classical algorithms via communication complexity

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Changpeng Shao

Abstract: Quantum-inspired classical algorithms provide us with a new way to understand the computational power of quantum computers for practically-relevant problems, especially in machine learning. In the past several years, numerous efficient algorithms for various tasks have been found, while an analysis of lower bounds is still missing. Using communication complexity, in this work we propose the first… ▽ More Quantum-inspired classical algorithms provide us with a new way to understand the computational power of quantum computers for practically-relevant problems, especially in machine learning. In the past several years, numerous efficient algorithms for various tasks have been found, while an analysis of lower bounds is still missing. Using communication complexity, in this work we propose the first method to study lower bounds for these tasks. We mainly focus on lower bounds for solving linear regressions, supervised clustering, principal component analysis, recommendation systems, and Hamiltonian simulations. For those problems, we prove a quadratic lower bound in terms of the Frobenius norm of the underlying matrix. As quantum algorithms are linear in the Frobenius norm for those problems, our results mean that the quantum-classical separation is at least quadratic. As a generalisation, we extend our method to study lower bounds analysis of quantum query algorithms for matrix-related problems using quantum communication complexity. Some applications are given. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 20 pages, final version

Journal ref: Quantum 9, 1593 (2025)

On the communication complexity of finding a king in a tournament

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Manaswi Paraashar, Swagato Sanyal, Nitin Saurabh

Abstract: A tournament is a complete directed graph. A king in a tournament is a vertex v such that every other vertex is reachable from v via a path of length at most 2. It is well known that every tournament has at least one king, one of which is a maximum out-degree vertex. The tasks of finding a king, a maximum out-degree vertex and a source in a tournament has been relatively well studied in the contex… ▽ More A tournament is a complete directed graph. A king in a tournament is a vertex v such that every other vertex is reachable from v via a path of length at most 2. It is well known that every tournament has at least one king, one of which is a maximum out-degree vertex. The tasks of finding a king, a maximum out-degree vertex and a source in a tournament has been relatively well studied in the context of query complexity. We study the communication complexity of these tasks, where the edges are partitioned between two players. The following are our main results for n-vertex tournaments: 1) The deterministic communication complexity of finding whether a source exists is tilde{Theta}(log^2 n). 2) The deterministic and randomized communication complexities of finding a king are Theta(n). The quantum communication complexity is tilde{Theta}(sqrt{n}). 3) The deterministic, randomized and quantum communication complexities of finding a maximum out-degree vertex are Theta(n log n), tilde{Theta}(n) and tilde{Theta}(sqrt{n}), respectively. Our upper bounds hold for all partitions of edges, and the lower bounds for a specific partition of the edges. To show the first bullet above, we show, perhaps surprisingly, that finding a source in a tournament is equivalent to the well-studied Clique vs. Independent Set (CIS) problem on undirected graphs. Our bounds for finding a source then follow from known bounds on the complexity of the CIS problem. In view of this equivalence, we can view the task of finding a king in a tournament to be a natural generalization of CIS. One of our lower bounds uses a fooling-set based argument, and all our other lower bounds follow from carefully-constructed reductions from Set-Disjointness. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Instance complexity of Boolean functions

Authors: Alison Hsiang-Hsuan Liu, Nikhil S. Mande

Abstract: In the area of query complexity of Boolean functions, the most widely studied cost measure of an algorithm is the worst-case number of queries made by it on an input. Motivated by the most natural cost measure studied in online algorithms, the competitive ratio, we consider a different cost measure for query algorithms for Boolean functions that captures the ratio of the cost of the algorithm and… ▽ More In the area of query complexity of Boolean functions, the most widely studied cost measure of an algorithm is the worst-case number of queries made by it on an input. Motivated by the most natural cost measure studied in online algorithms, the competitive ratio, we consider a different cost measure for query algorithms for Boolean functions that captures the ratio of the cost of the algorithm and the cost of an optimal algorithm that knows the input in advance. The cost of an algorithm is its largest cost over all inputs. Grossman, Komargodski and Naor [ITCS'20] introduced this measure for Boolean functions, and dubbed it instance complexity. Grossman et al. showed, among other results, that monotone Boolean functions with instance complexity 1 are precisely those that depend on one or two variables. We complement the above-mentioned result of Grossman et al. by completely characterizing the instance complexity of symmetric Boolean functions. As a corollary we conclude that the only symmetric Boolean functions with instance complexity 1 are the Parity function and its complement. We also study the instance complexity of some graph properties like Connectivity and k-clique containment. In all the Boolean functions we study above, and those studied by Grossman et al., the instance complexity turns out to be the ratio of query complexity to minimum certificate complexity. It is a natural question to ask if this is the correct bound for all Boolean functions. We show a negative answer in a very strong sense, by analyzing the instance complexity of the Greater-Than and Odd-Max-Bit functions. We show that the above-mentioned ratio is linear in the input size for both of these functions, while we exhibit algorithms for which the instance complexity is a constant. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Randomized and quantum query complexities of finding a king in a tournament

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Manaswi Paraashar, Nitin Saurabh

Abstract: A tournament is a complete directed graph. It is well known that every tournament contains at least one vertex v such that every other vertex is reachable from v by a path of length at most 2. All such vertices v are called *kings* of the underlying tournament. Despite active recent research in the area, the best-known upper and lower bounds on the deterministic query complexity (with query access… ▽ More A tournament is a complete directed graph. It is well known that every tournament contains at least one vertex v such that every other vertex is reachable from v by a path of length at most 2. All such vertices v are called *kings* of the underlying tournament. Despite active recent research in the area, the best-known upper and lower bounds on the deterministic query complexity (with query access to directions of edges) of finding a king in a tournament on n vertices are from over 20 years ago, and the bounds do not match: the best-known lower bound is Omega(n^{4/3}) and the best-known upper bound is O(n^{3/2}) [Shen, Sheng, Wu, SICOMP'03]. Our contribution is to show essentially *tight* bounds (up to logarithmic factors) of Theta(n) and Theta(sqrt{n}) in the *randomized* and *quantum* query models, respectively. We also study the randomized and quantum query complexities of finding a maximum out-degree vertex in a tournament. △ Less

Submitted 4 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Tight Bounds for Quantum Phase Estimation and Related Problems

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: Phase estimation, due to Kitaev [arXiv'95], is one of the most fundamental subroutines in quantum computing. In the basic scenario, one is given black-box access to a unitary $U$, and an eigenstate $\lvert ψ\rangle$ of $U$ with unknown eigenvalue $e^{iθ}$, and the task is to estimate the eigenphase $θ$ within $\pmδ$, with high probability. The cost of an algorithm for us will be the number of appl… ▽ More Phase estimation, due to Kitaev [arXiv'95], is one of the most fundamental subroutines in quantum computing. In the basic scenario, one is given black-box access to a unitary $U$, and an eigenstate $\lvert ψ\rangle$ of $U$ with unknown eigenvalue $e^{iθ}$, and the task is to estimate the eigenphase $θ$ within $\pmδ$, with high probability. The cost of an algorithm for us will be the number of applications of $U$ and $U^{-1}$. We tightly characterize the cost of several variants of phase estimation where we are no longer given an arbitrary eigenstate, but are required to estimate the maximum eigenphase of $U$, aided by advice in the form of states (or a unitary preparing those states) which are promised to have at least a certain overlap $γ$ with the top eigenspace. We give algorithms and matching lower bounds (up to logarithmic factors) for all ranges of parameters. We show that a small number of copies of the advice state (or of an advice-preparing unitary) are not significantly better than having no advice at all. We also show that having lots of advice (applications of the advice-preparing unitary) does not significantly reduce cost, and neither does knowledge of the eigenbasis of $U$. As an immediate consequence we obtain a lower bound on the complexity of the Unitary recurrence time problem, matching an upper bound of She and Yuen~[ITCS'23] and resolving one of their open questions. Lastly, we show that a phase-estimation algorithm with precision $δ$ and error probability $ε$ has cost $Ω\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}ε\right)$, matching an easy upper bound. This contrasts with some other scenarios in quantum computing (e.g., search) where error-reduction costs only a factor $O(\sqrt{\log(1/ε)})$. Our lower bound technique uses a variant of the polynomial method with trigonometric polynomials. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Lifting to Parity Decision Trees Via Stifling

Authors: Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Nikhil S. Mande, Swagato Sanyal, Suhail Sherif

Abstract: We show that the deterministic decision tree complexity of a (partial) function or relation $f$ lifts to the deterministic parity decision tree (PDT) size complexity of the composed function/relation $f \circ g$ as long as the gadget $g$ satisfies a property that we call stifling. We observe that several simple gadgets of constant size, like Indexing on 3 input bits, Inner Product on 4 input bits,… ▽ More We show that the deterministic decision tree complexity of a (partial) function or relation $f$ lifts to the deterministic parity decision tree (PDT) size complexity of the composed function/relation $f \circ g$ as long as the gadget $g$ satisfies a property that we call stifling. We observe that several simple gadgets of constant size, like Indexing on 3 input bits, Inner Product on 4 input bits, Majority on 3 input bits and random functions, satisfy this property. It can be shown that existing randomized communication lifting theorems ([Göös, Pitassi, Watson. SICOMP'20], [Chattopadhyay et al. SICOMP'21]) imply PDT-size lifting. However there are two shortcomings of this approach: first they lift randomized decision tree complexity of $f$, which could be exponentially smaller than its deterministic counterpart when either $f$ is a partial function or even a total search problem. Second, the size of the gadgets in such lifting theorems are as large as logarithmic in the size of the input to $f$. Reducing the gadget size to a constant is an important open problem at the frontier of current research. Our result shows that even a random constant-size gadget does enable lifting to PDT size. Further, it also yields the first systematic way of turning lower bounds on the width of tree-like resolution proofs of the unsatisfiability of constant-width CNF formulas to lower bounds on the size of tree-like proofs in the resolution with parity system, i.e., $\textit{Res}$($\oplus$), of the unsatisfiability of closely related constant-width CNF formulas. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Improved Quantum Query Upper Bounds Based on Classical Decision Trees

Authors: Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro

Abstract: Given a classical query algorithm as a decision tree, when does there exist a quantum query algorithm with a speed-up over the classical one? We provide a general construction based on the structure of the underlying decision tree, and prove that this can give us an up-to-quadratic quantum speed-up. In particular, we obtain a bounded-error quantum query algorithm of cost $O(\sqrt{s})$ to compute a… ▽ More Given a classical query algorithm as a decision tree, when does there exist a quantum query algorithm with a speed-up over the classical one? We provide a general construction based on the structure of the underlying decision tree, and prove that this can give us an up-to-quadratic quantum speed-up. In particular, we obtain a bounded-error quantum query algorithm of cost $O(\sqrt{s})$ to compute a Boolean function (more generally, a relation) that can be computed by a classical (even randomized) decision tree of size $s$. Lin and Lin [ToC'16] and Beigi and Taghavi [Quantum'20] showed results of a similar flavor, and gave upper bounds in terms of a quantity which we call the "guessing complexity" of a decision tree. We identify that the guessing complexity of a decision tree equals its rank, a notion introduced by Ehrenfeucht and Haussler [Inf. Comp.'89] in the context of learning theory. This answers a question posed by Lin and Lin, who asked whether the guessing complexity of a decision tree is related to any complexity-theoretic measure. We also show a polynomial separation between rank and randomized rank for the complete binary AND-OR tree. Beigi and Taghavi constructed span programs and dual adversary solutions for Boolean functions given classical decision trees computing them and an assignment of non-negative weights to its edges. We explore the effect of changing these weights on the resulting span program complexity and objective value of the dual adversary bound, and capture the best possible weighting scheme by an optimization program. We exhibit a solution to this program and argue its optimality from first principles. We also exhibit decision trees for which our bounds are asymptotically stronger than those of Lin and Lin, and Beigi and Taghavi. This answers a question of Beigi and Taghavi, who asked whether different weighting schemes could yield better upper bounds. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2025; v1 submitted 6 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Exact quantum query complexity of computing Hamming weight modulo powers of two and three

Authors: Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Maris Ozols, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: We study the problem of computing the Hamming weight of an $n$-bit string modulo $m$, for any positive integer $m \leq n$ whose only prime factors are 2 and 3. We show that the exact quantum query complexity of this problem is $\left\lceil n(1 - 1/m) \right\rceil$. The upper bound is via an iterative query algorithm whose core components are the well-known 1-query quantum algorithm (essentially du… ▽ More We study the problem of computing the Hamming weight of an $n$-bit string modulo $m$, for any positive integer $m \leq n$ whose only prime factors are 2 and 3. We show that the exact quantum query complexity of this problem is $\left\lceil n(1 - 1/m) \right\rceil$. The upper bound is via an iterative query algorithm whose core components are the well-known 1-query quantum algorithm (essentially due to Deutsch) to compute the Hamming weight a 2-bit string mod 2 (i.e., the parity of the input bits), and a new 2-query quantum algorithm to compute the Hamming weight of a 3-bit string mod 3. We show a matching lower bound (in fact for arbitrary moduli $m$) via a variant of the polynomial method [de Wolf, SIAM J. Comput., 32(3), 2003]. This bound is for the weaker task of deciding whether or not a given $n$-bit input has Hamming weight 0 modulo $m$, and it holds even in the stronger non-deterministic quantum query model where an algorithm must have positive acceptance probability iff its input evaluates to 1. For $m>2$ our lower bound exceeds $n/2$, beating the best lower bound provable using the general polynomial method [Theorem 4.3, Beals et al., J. ACM 48(4), 2001]. △ Less

Submitted 29 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 12 pages LaTeX

Tight Bounds for the Randomized and Quantum Communication Complexities of Equality with Small Error

Authors: Olivier Lalonde, Nikhil S. Mande, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: We investigate the randomized and quantum communication complexities of the well-studied Equality function with small error probability $ε$, getting optimal constant factors in the leading terms in a number of different models. In the randomized model, 1) we give a general technique to convert public-coin protocols to private-coin protocols by incurring a small multiplicative error, at a small… ▽ More We investigate the randomized and quantum communication complexities of the well-studied Equality function with small error probability $ε$, getting optimal constant factors in the leading terms in a number of different models. In the randomized model, 1) we give a general technique to convert public-coin protocols to private-coin protocols by incurring a small multiplicative error, at a small additive cost. This is an improvement over Newman's theorem [Inf. Proc. Let.'91] in the dependence on the error parameter. 2) Using this we obtain a $(\log(n/ε^2)+4)$-cost private-coin communication protocol that computes the $n$-bit Equality function, to error $ε$. This improves upon the $\log(n/ε^3)+O(1)$ upper bound implied by Newman's theorem, and matches the best known lower bound, which follows from Alon [Comb. Prob. Comput.'09], up to an additive $\log\log(1/ε)+O(1)$. In the quantum model, 1) we exhibit a one-way protocol of cost $\log(n/ε)+4$, that uses only pure states and computes the $n$-bit Equality function to error $ε$. This bound was implicitly already shown by Nayak [PhD thesis'99]. 2) We show that any $ε$-error one-way protocol for $n$-bit Equality that uses only pure states communicates at least $\log(n/ε)-\log\log(1/ε)-O(1)$ qubits. 3) We exhibit a one-way protocol of cost $\log(\sqrt{n}/ε)+3$, that uses mixed states and computes the $n$-bit Equality function to error $ε$. This is also tight up to an additive $\log\log(1/ε)+O(1)$, which follows from Alon's result. 4) We study the number of EPR pairs required to be shared in an entanglement-assisted one-way protocol. Our upper bounds also yield upper bounds on the approximate rank and related measures of the Identity matrix. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2023; v1 submitted 25 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: v2: Added some results and an author. 19 pages

One-way communication complexity and non-adaptive decision trees

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Swagato Sanyal, Suhail Sherif

Abstract: We study the relationship between various one-way communication complexity measures of a composed function with the analogous decision tree complexity of the outer function. We consider two gadgets: the AND function on 2 inputs, and the Inner Product on a constant number of inputs. Let $IP$ denote Inner Product on $2b$ bits. - If $f$ is a total Boolean function that depends on all of its inputs,… ▽ More We study the relationship between various one-way communication complexity measures of a composed function with the analogous decision tree complexity of the outer function. We consider two gadgets: the AND function on 2 inputs, and the Inner Product on a constant number of inputs. Let $IP$ denote Inner Product on $2b$ bits. - If $f$ is a total Boolean function that depends on all of its inputs, the bounded-error one-way quantum communication complexity of $f \circ IP$ equals $Ω(n(b-1))$. - If $f$ is a partial Boolean function, the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ IP$ is at least $Ω(b \cdot D_{dt}^{\rightarrow}(f))$, where $D_{dt}^{\rightarrow}(f)$ denotes the non-adaptive decision tree complexity of $f$. Montanaro and Osborne [arXiv'09] observed that the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ XOR_2$ equals the non-adaptive parity decision tree complexity of $f$. In contrast, we show the following with the gadget $AND_2$. - There exists a function for which even the quantum non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ is exponentially large in the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$. - For symmetric functions $f$, the non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ is at most quadratic in the (even two-way) communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$. In view of the first point, a lower bound on non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ does not lift to a lower bound on one-way communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$. In our final result we show that for all $f$, the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $F = f \circ AND_2$ is at most $(rank(M_{F}))(1 - Ω(1))$, where $M_{F}$ denotes the communication matrix of $F$. This shows that the rank upper bound on one-way communication complexity (which can be tight in general) is not tight for AND-composed functions. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 33 pages

The Role of Symmetry in Quantum Query-to-Communication Simulation

Authors: Sourav Chakraborty, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Peter Høyer, Nikhil S. Mande, Manaswi Paraashar, Ronald de Wolf

Abstract: Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson (STOC'98) showed that for every Boolean function f : {-1,1}^n to {-1,1} and G in {AND_2, XOR_2}, the bounded-error quantum communication complexity of the composed function f o G equals O(Q(f) log n), where Q(f) denotes the bounded-error quantum query complexity of f. This is achieved by Alice running the optimal quantum query algorithm for f, using a round of O(log n)… ▽ More Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson (STOC'98) showed that for every Boolean function f : {-1,1}^n to {-1,1} and G in {AND_2, XOR_2}, the bounded-error quantum communication complexity of the composed function f o G equals O(Q(f) log n), where Q(f) denotes the bounded-error quantum query complexity of f. This is achieved by Alice running the optimal quantum query algorithm for f, using a round of O(log n) qubits of communication to implement each query. This is in contrast with the classical setting, where it is easy to show that R^{cc}(f o G) is at most 2R(f), where R^{cc} and R denote bounded-error communication and query complexity, respectively. We show that the O(log n) overhead is required for some functions in the quantum setting, and thus the BCW simulation is tight. We note here that prior to our work, the possibility of Q^{cc}(f o G) = O(Q(f)), for all f and all G in {AND_2, XOR_2}, had not been ruled out. More specifically, we show the following. - We show that the log n overhead is *not* required when f is symmetric, generalizing a result of Aaronson and Ambainis for the Set-Disjointness function (Theory of Computing'05). - In order to prove the above, we design an efficient distributed version of noisy amplitude amplification that allows us to prove the result when f is the OR function. - In view of our first result above, one may ask whether the log n overhead in the BCW simulation can be avoided even when f is transitive, which is a weaker notion of symmetry. We give a strong negative answer by showing that the log n overhead is still necessary for some transitive functions even when we allow the quantum communication protocol an error probability that can be arbitrarily close to 1/2. - We also give, among other things, a general recipe to construct functions for which the log n overhead is required in the BCW simulation in the bounded-error communication model. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 9 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 37 pages. This is a merger of two papers that appeared in CCC'20 (10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.32) and STACS'22 (10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2022.20)

Tight Chang's-lemma-type bounds for Boolean functions

Authors: Sourav Chakraborty, Nikhil S. Mande, Rajat Mittal, Tulasimohan Molli, Manaswi Paraashar, Swagato Sanyal

Abstract: Chang's lemma (Duke Mathematical Journal, 2002) is a classical result with applications across several areas in mathematics and computer science. For a Boolean function $f$ that takes values in {-1,1} let $r(f)$ denote its Fourier rank. For each positive threshold $t$, Chang's lemma provides a lower bound on $wt(f):=\Pr[f(x)=-1]$ in terms of the dimension of the span of its characters with Fourier… ▽ More Chang's lemma (Duke Mathematical Journal, 2002) is a classical result with applications across several areas in mathematics and computer science. For a Boolean function $f$ that takes values in {-1,1} let $r(f)$ denote its Fourier rank. For each positive threshold $t$, Chang's lemma provides a lower bound on $wt(f):=\Pr[f(x)=-1]$ in terms of the dimension of the span of its characters with Fourier coefficients of magnitude at least $1/t$. We examine the tightness of Chang's lemma w.r.t. the following three natural settings of the threshold: - the Fourier sparsity of $f$, denoted $k(f)$, - the Fourier max-supp-entropy of $f$, denoted $k'(f)$, defined to be $\max \{1/|\hat{f}(S)| : \hat{f}(S) \neq 0\}$, - the Fourier max-rank-entropy of $f$, denoted $k''(f)$, defined to be the minimum $t$ such that characters whose Fourier coefficients are at least $1/t$ in absolute value span a space of dimension $r(f)$. We prove new lower bounds on $wt(f)$ in terms of these measures. One of our lower bounds subsumes and refines the previously best known upper bound on $r(f)$ in terms of $k(f)$ by Sanyal (ToC, 2019). Another lower bound is based on our improvement of a bound by Chattopadhyay, Hatami, Lovett and Tal (ITCS, 2019) on the sum of the absolute values of the level-$1$ Fourier coefficients. We also show that Chang's lemma for the these choices of the threshold is asymptotically outperformed by our bounds for most settings of the parameters involved. Next, we show that our bounds are tight for a wide range of the parameters involved, by constructing functions (which are modifications of the Addressing function) witnessing their tightness. Finally we construct Boolean functions $f$ for which - our lower bounds asymptotically match $wt(f)$, and - for any choice of the threshold $t$, the lower bound obtained from Chang's lemma is asymptotically smaller than $wt(f)$. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2021; v1 submitted 3 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

On parity decision trees for Fourier-sparse Boolean functions

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Swagato Sanyal

Abstract: We study parity decision trees for Boolean functions. The motivation of our study is the log-rank conjecture for XOR functions and its connection to Fourier analysis and parity decision tree complexity. Let f be a Boolean function with Fourier support S and Fourier sparsity k. 1) We prove via the probabilistic method that there exists a parity decision tree of depth O(sqrt k) that computes f. Th… ▽ More We study parity decision trees for Boolean functions. The motivation of our study is the log-rank conjecture for XOR functions and its connection to Fourier analysis and parity decision tree complexity. Let f be a Boolean function with Fourier support S and Fourier sparsity k. 1) We prove via the probabilistic method that there exists a parity decision tree of depth O(sqrt k) that computes f. This matches the best known upper bound on the parity decision tree complexity of Boolean functions (Tsang, Wong, Xie, and Zhang, FOCS 2013). Moreover, while previous constructions (Tsang et al., FOCS 2013, Shpilka, Tal, and Volk, Comput. Complex. 2017) build the trees by carefully choosing the parities to be queried in each step, our proof shows that a naive sampling of the parities suffices. 2) We generalize the above result by showing that if the Fourier spectra of Boolean functions satisfy a natural "folding property", then the above proof can be adapted to establish existence of a tree of complexity polynomially smaller than O(sqrt k). We make a conjecture in this regard which, if true, implies that the communication complexity of an XOR function is bounded above by the fourth root of the rank of its communication matrix, improving upon the previously known upper bound of square root of rank (Tsang et al., FOCS 2013, Lovett, J. ACM. 2016). 3) It can be shown by elementary techniques that for any Boolean function f and all pairs (alpha, beta) of parities in S, there exists another pair (gamma, delta) of parities in S such that alpha + beta = gamma + delta. We show, among other results, that there must exist several gamma in F_2^n such that there are at least three pairs (alpha_1, alpha_2) of parities in S with alpha_1 + alpha_2 = gamma. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

MSC Class: 68Q11 ACM Class: F.1.1

Improved Approximate Degree Bounds For k-distinctness

Authors: Nikhil S. Mande, Justin Thaler, Shuchen Zhu

Abstract: An open problem that is widely regarded as one of the most important in quantum query complexity is to resolve the quantum query complexity of the k-distinctness function on inputs of size N. While the case of k=2 (also called Element Distinctness) is well-understood, there is a polynomial gap between the known upper and lower bounds for all constants k>2. Specifically, the best known upper bound… ▽ More An open problem that is widely regarded as one of the most important in quantum query complexity is to resolve the quantum query complexity of the k-distinctness function on inputs of size N. While the case of k=2 (also called Element Distinctness) is well-understood, there is a polynomial gap between the known upper and lower bounds for all constants k>2. Specifically, the best known upper bound is O(N^{(3/4)-1/(2^{k+2}-4)}) (Belovs, FOCS 2012), while the best known lower bound for k >= 2 is Omega(N^{2/3} + N^{(3/4)-1/(2k)}) (Aaronson and Shi, J.~ACM 2004; Bun, Kothari, and Thaler, STOC 2018). For any constant k >= 4, we improve the lower bound to Omega(N^{(3/4)-1/(4k)}). This yields, for example, the first proof that 4-distinctness is strictly harder than Element Distinctness. Our lower bound applies more generally to approximate degree. As a secondary result, we give a simple construction of an approximating polynomial of degree O(N^{3/4}) that applies whenever k <= polylog(N). △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Journal ref: 15th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2020)

Quantum Query-to-Communication Simulation Needs a Logarithmic Overhead

Authors: Sourav Chakraborty, Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Nikhil S. Mande, Manaswi Paraashar

Abstract: Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson (STOC'98) observed that for every Boolean function $f : \{-1, 1\}^n \to \{-1, 1\}$ and $\bullet : \{-1, 1\}^2 \to \{-1, 1\}$ the two-party bounded-error quantum communication complexity of $(f \circ \bullet)$ is $O(Q(f) \log n)$, where $Q(f)$ is the bounded-error quantum query complexity of $f$. Note that the bounded-error randomized communication complexity of… ▽ More Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson (STOC'98) observed that for every Boolean function $f : \{-1, 1\}^n \to \{-1, 1\}$ and $\bullet : \{-1, 1\}^2 \to \{-1, 1\}$ the two-party bounded-error quantum communication complexity of $(f \circ \bullet)$ is $O(Q(f) \log n)$, where $Q(f)$ is the bounded-error quantum query complexity of $f$. Note that the bounded-error randomized communication complexity of $(f \circ \bullet)$ is bounded by $O(R(f))$, where $R(f)$ denotes the bounded-error randomized query complexity of $f$. Thus, the BCW simulation has an extra $O(\log n)$ factor appearing that is absent in classical simulation. A natural question is if this factor can be avoided. Høyer and de Wolf (STACS'02) showed that for the Set-Disjointness function, this can be reduced to $c^{\log^* n}$ for some constant $c$, and subsequently Aaronson and Ambainis (FOCS'03) showed that this factor can be made a constant. That is, the quantum communication complexity of the Set-Disjointness function (which is $\mathsf{NOR}_n \circ \wedge$) is $O(Q(\mathsf{NOR}_n))$. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, we show that when $ \bullet = \oplus$, then the extra $\log n$ factor in the BCW simulation is unavoidable. In other words, we exhibit a total function $F : \{-1, 1\}^n \to \{-1, 1\}$ such that $Q^{cc}(F \circ \oplus) = Θ(Q(F) \log n)$. To the best of our knowledge, it was not even known prior to this work whether there existed a total function $F$ and 2-bit function $\bullet$, such that $Q^{cc}(F \circ \bullet) = ω(Q(F))$. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Approximate degree, secret sharing, and concentration phenomena

Authors: Andrej Bogdanov, Nikhil S. Mande, Justin Thaler, Christopher Williamson

Abstract: The $ε$-approximate degree $deg_ε(f)$ of a Boolean function $f$ is the least degree of a real-valued polynomial that approximates $f$ pointwise to error $ε$. The approximate degree of $f$ is at least $k$ iff there exists a pair of probability distributions, also known as a dual polynomial, that are perfectly $k$-wise indistinguishable, but are distinguishable by $f$ with advantage $1 - ε$. Our con… ▽ More The $ε$-approximate degree $deg_ε(f)$ of a Boolean function $f$ is the least degree of a real-valued polynomial that approximates $f$ pointwise to error $ε$. The approximate degree of $f$ is at least $k$ iff there exists a pair of probability distributions, also known as a dual polynomial, that are perfectly $k$-wise indistinguishable, but are distinguishable by $f$ with advantage $1 - ε$. Our contributions are: We give a simple new construction of a dual polynomial for the AND function, certifying that $deg_ε(f) \geq Ω(\sqrt{n \log 1/ε})$. This construction is the first to extend to the notion of weighted degree, and yields the first explicit certificate that the $1/3$-approximate degree of any read-once DNF is $Ω(\sqrt{n})$. We show that any pair of symmetric distributions on $n$-bit strings that are perfectly $k$-wise indistinguishable are also statistically $K$-wise indistinguishable with error at most $K^{3/2} \cdot \exp(-Ω(k^2/K))$ for all $k < K < n/64$. This implies that any symmetric function $f$ is a reconstruction function with constant advantage for a ramp secret sharing scheme that is secure against size-$K$ coalitions with statistical error $K^{3/2} \exp(-Ω(deg_{1/3}(f)^2/K))$ for all values of $K$ up to $n/64$ simultaneously. Previous secret sharing schemes required that $K$ be determined in advance, and only worked for $f=$ AND. Our analyses draw new connections between approximate degree and concentration phenomena. As a corollary, we show that for any $d < n/64$, any degree $d$ polynomial approximating a symmetric function $f$ to error $1/3$ must have $\ell_1$-norm at least $K^{-3/2} \exp({Ω(deg_{1/3}(f)^2/d)})$, which we also show to be tight for any $d > deg_{1/3}(f)$. These upper and lower bounds were also previously only known in the case $f=$ AND. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Sign-Rank Can Increase Under Intersection

Authors: Mark Bun, Nikhil S. Mande, Justin Thaler

Abstract: The communication class $\mathbf{UPP}^{\text{cc}}$ is a communication analog of the Turing Machine complexity class $\mathbf{PP}$. It is characterized by a matrix-analytic complexity measure called sign-rank (also called dimension complexity), and is essentially the most powerful communication class against which we know how to prove lower bounds. For a communication problem $f$, let… ▽ More The communication class $\mathbf{UPP}^{\text{cc}}$ is a communication analog of the Turing Machine complexity class $\mathbf{PP}$. It is characterized by a matrix-analytic complexity measure called sign-rank (also called dimension complexity), and is essentially the most powerful communication class against which we know how to prove lower bounds. For a communication problem $f$, let $f \wedge f$ denote the function that evaluates $f$ on two disjoint inputs and outputs the AND of the results. We exhibit a communication problem $f$ with $\mathbf{UPP}(f)= O(\log n)$, and $\mathbf{UPP}(f \wedge f) = Θ(\log^2 n)$. This is the first result showing that $\mathbf{UPP}$ communication complexity can increase by more than a constant factor under intersection. We view this as a first step toward showing that $\mathbf{UPP}^{\text{cc}}$, the class of problems with polylogarithmic-cost $\mathbf{UPP}$ communication protocols, is not closed under intersection. Our result shows that the function class consisting of intersections of two majorities on $n$ bits has dimension complexity $n^{Ω(\log n)}$. This matches an upper bound of (Klivans, O'Donnell, and Servedio, FOCS 2002), who used it to give a quasipolynomial time algorithm for PAC learning intersections of polylogarithmically many majorities. Hence, fundamentally new techniques will be needed to learn this class of functions in polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 18 pages

MSC Class: 68Q17

Weights at the Bottom Matter When the Top is Heavy

Authors: Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Nikhil S. Mande

Abstract: Proving super-polynomial lower bounds against depth-2 threshold circuits of the form THR of THR is a well-known open problem that represents a frontier of our understanding in boolean circuit complexity. By contrast, exponential lower bounds on the size of THR of MAJ circuits were shown by Razborov and Sherstov (SIAM J.Comput., 2010) even for computing functions in depth-3 AC^0. Yet, no separation… ▽ More Proving super-polynomial lower bounds against depth-2 threshold circuits of the form THR of THR is a well-known open problem that represents a frontier of our understanding in boolean circuit complexity. By contrast, exponential lower bounds on the size of THR of MAJ circuits were shown by Razborov and Sherstov (SIAM J.Comput., 2010) even for computing functions in depth-3 AC^0. Yet, no separation among the two depth-2 threshold circuit classes were known. In fact, it is not clear a priori that they ought to be different. In particular, Goldmann, Hastad and Razborov (Computational Complexity, 1992) showed that the class MAJ of MAJ is identical to the class MAJ of THR. In this work, we provide an exponential separation between THR of MAJ and THR of THR. We achieve this by showing a function f that is computed by linear size THR of THR circuits and yet has exponentially large sign rank. This, by a well-known result, implies that f requires exponentially large THR of MAJ circuits to be computed. Our result suggests that the sign rank method alone is unlikely to prove strong lower bounds against THR of THR circuits. The main technical ingredient of our work is to prove a strong sign rank lower bound for an XOR function. This requires novel use of approximation theoretic tools. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

ACM Class: F.1.3

Dual polynomials and communication complexity of $\textsf{XOR}$ functions

Authors: Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Nikhil S. Mande

Abstract: We show a new duality between the polynomial margin complexity of $f$ and the discrepancy of the function $f \circ \textsf{XOR}$, called an $\textsf{XOR}$ function. Using this duality, we develop polynomial based techniques for understanding the bounded error ($\textsf{BPP}$) and the weakly-unbounded error ($\textsf{PP}$) communication complexities of $\textsf{XOR}$ functions. We show the followin… ▽ More We show a new duality between the polynomial margin complexity of $f$ and the discrepancy of the function $f \circ \textsf{XOR}$, called an $\textsf{XOR}$ function. Using this duality, we develop polynomial based techniques for understanding the bounded error ($\textsf{BPP}$) and the weakly-unbounded error ($\textsf{PP}$) communication complexities of $\textsf{XOR}$ functions. We show the following. A weak form of an interesting conjecture of Zhang and Shi (Quantum Information and Computation, 2009) (The full conjecture has just been reported to be independently settled by Hatami and Qian (Arxiv, 2017). However, their techniques are quite different and are not known to yield many of the results we obtain here). Zhang and Shi assert that for symmetric functions $f : \{0, 1\}^n \rightarrow \{-1, 1\}$, the weakly unbounded-error complexity of $f \circ \textsf{XOR}$ is essentially characterized by the number of points $i$ in the set $\{0,1, \dots,n-2\}$ for which $D_f(i) \neq D_f(i+2)$, where $D_f$ is the predicate corresponding to $f$. The number of such points is called the odd-even degree of $f$. We show that the $\textsf{PP}$ complexity of $f \circ \textsf{XOR}$ is $Ω(k/ \log(n/k))$. We resolve a conjecture of a different Zhang characterizing the Threshold of Parity circuit size of symmetric functions in terms of their odd-even degree. We obtain a new proof of the exponential separation between $\textsf{PP}^{cc}$ and $\textsf{UPP}^{cc}$ via an $\textsf{XOR}$ function. We provide a characterization of the approximate spectral norm of symmetric functions, affirming a conjecture of Ada et al. (APPROX-RANDOM, 2012) which has several consequences. Additionally, we prove strong $\textsf{UPP}$ lower bounds for $f \circ \textsf{XOR}$, when $f$ is symmetric and periodic with period $O(n^{1/2-ε})$, for any constant $ε> 0$. △ Less

Submitted 8 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.