Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Mamakani, K

A New Rose : The First Simple Symmetric 11-Venn Diagram

Authors: Khalegh Mamakani, Frank Ruskey

Abstract: A symmetric Venn diagram is one that is invariant under rotation, up to a relabeling of curves. A simple Venn diagram is one in which at most two curves intersect at any point. In this paper we introduce a new property of Venn diagrams called crosscut symmetry, which is related to dihedral symmetry. Utilizing a computer search restricted to crosscut symmetry we found many simple symmetric Venn dia… ▽ More A symmetric Venn diagram is one that is invariant under rotation, up to a relabeling of curves. A simple Venn diagram is one in which at most two curves intersect at any point. In this paper we introduce a new property of Venn diagrams called crosscut symmetry, which is related to dihedral symmetry. Utilizing a computer search restricted to crosscut symmetry we found many simple symmetric Venn diagrams with 11 curves. This answers an existence question that has been open since the 1960's. The first such diagram that was discovered is shown here. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

Parallel and sequential in-place permuting and perfect shuffling using involutions

Authors: Qingxuan Yang, John Ellis, Khalegh Mamakani, Frank Ruskey

Abstract: We show that any permutation of ${1,2,...,N}$ can be written as the product of two involutions. As a consequence, any permutation of the elements of an array can be performed in-place in parallel in time O(1). In the case where the permutation is the $k$-way perfect shuffle we develop two methods for efficiently computing such a pair of involutions. The first method works whenever $N$ is a power… ▽ More We show that any permutation of ${1,2,...,N}$ can be written as the product of two involutions. As a consequence, any permutation of the elements of an array can be performed in-place in parallel in time O(1). In the case where the permutation is the $k$-way perfect shuffle we develop two methods for efficiently computing such a pair of involutions. The first method works whenever $N$ is a power of $k$; in this case the time is O(N) and space $O(\log^2 N)$. The second method applies to the general case where $N$ is a multiple of $k$; here the time is $O(N \log N)$ and the space is $O(\log^2 N)$. If $k=2$ the space usage of the first method can be reduced to $O(\log N)$ on a machine that has a SADD (population count) instruction. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2013; v1 submitted 9 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.