-
Self-interested behaviour as a social norm
Authors:
Kamilla Haworth Buchter,
Bjarke Mønsted,
Sune Lehmann
Abstract:
Language can exert a strong influence on human behaviour. In experimental studies, it is for example well-known that the framing of an experiment or priming at the beginning of an experiment can alter participants' behaviour. However, few studies have been conducted to determine why framing or priming specific words can alter people's behaviour. Here, we show that the behaviour of participants in…
▽ More
Language can exert a strong influence on human behaviour. In experimental studies, it is for example well-known that the framing of an experiment or priming at the beginning of an experiment can alter participants' behaviour. However, few studies have been conducted to determine why framing or priming specific words can alter people's behaviour. Here, we show that the behaviour of participants in a game-theoretical experiment is driven mainly by social norms, and that participants' adherence to different social norms is influenced by the exposure to economic terminology. To explore how these terminology-driven changes impact behavior at the system level, we use established frameworks for modeling collective cooperative behaviour. We find that economic terminology induces a behavioural difference which is larger than that caused by financial incentives in the magnitude usually employed in experiments and simulation. These findings place an increased responsibility on scientists and science communicators, as scientific terminology is increasingly communicated to the general population.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Algorithmic Detection and Analysis of Vaccine-Denialist Sentiment Clusters in Social Networks
Authors:
Bjarke Mønsted,
Sune Lehmann
Abstract:
Vaccination rates are decreasing in many areas of the world, and outbreaks of preventable diseases tend to follow in areas with particular low rates. Much research has been devoted to improving our understanding of the motivations behind vaccination decisions and the effects of various types of information offered to skeptics, no large-scale study of the structure of online vaccination discourse h…
▽ More
Vaccination rates are decreasing in many areas of the world, and outbreaks of preventable diseases tend to follow in areas with particular low rates. Much research has been devoted to improving our understanding of the motivations behind vaccination decisions and the effects of various types of information offered to skeptics, no large-scale study of the structure of online vaccination discourse have been conducted.
Here, we offer an approach to quantitatively study the vaccine discourse in an online system, exemplified by Twitter. We use train a deep neural network to predict tweet vaccine sentiments, surpassing state-of-the-art performance, attaining two-class accuracy of $90.4\%$, and a three-class F1 of $0.762$. We identify profiles which consistently produce strongly anti- and pro-vaccine content. We find that strongly anti-vaccine profiles primarily post links to Youtube, and commercial sites that make money on selling alternative health products, representing a conflict of interest. We also visualize the network of repeated mutual interactions of actors in the vaccine discourse and find that it is highly stratified, with an assortativity coefficient of $r = .813$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Evidence of Complex Contagion of Information in Social Media: An Experiment Using Twitter Bots
Authors:
Bjarke Mønsted,
Piotr Sapieżyński,
Emilio Ferrara,
Sune Lehmann
Abstract:
It has recently become possible to study the dynamics of information diffusion in techno-social systems at scale, due to the emergence of online platforms, such as Twitter, with millions of users. One question that systematically recurs is whether information spreads according to simple or complex dynamics: does each exposure to a piece of information have an independent probability of a user adop…
▽ More
It has recently become possible to study the dynamics of information diffusion in techno-social systems at scale, due to the emergence of online platforms, such as Twitter, with millions of users. One question that systematically recurs is whether information spreads according to simple or complex dynamics: does each exposure to a piece of information have an independent probability of a user adopting it (simple contagion), or does this probability depend instead on the number of sources of exposure, increasing above some threshold (complex contagion)? Most studies to date are observational and, therefore, unable to disentangle the effects of confounding factors such as social reinforcement, homophily, limited attention, or network community structure. Here we describe a novel controlled experiment that we performed on Twitter using `social bots' deployed to carry out coordinated attempts at spreading information. We propose two Bayesian statistical models describing simple and complex contagion dynamics, and test the competing hypotheses. We provide experimental evidence that the complex contagion model describes the observed information diffusion behavior more accurately than simple contagion. Future applications of our results include more effective defenses against malicious propaganda campaigns on social media, improved marketing and advertisement strategies, and design of effective network intervention techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Phone-based Metric as a Predictor for Basic Personality Traits
Authors:
Bjarke Mønsted,
Anders Mollgaard,
Joachim Mathiesen
Abstract:
Basic personality traits are typically assessed through questionnaires. Here we consider phone-based metrics as a way to asses personality traits. We use data from smartphones with custom data-collection software distributed to 730 individuals. The data includes information about location, physical motion, face-to-face contacts, online social network friends, text messages and calls. The data is f…
▽ More
Basic personality traits are typically assessed through questionnaires. Here we consider phone-based metrics as a way to asses personality traits. We use data from smartphones with custom data-collection software distributed to 730 individuals. The data includes information about location, physical motion, face-to-face contacts, online social network friends, text messages and calls. The data is further complemented by questionnaire-based data on basic personality traits. From the phone-based metrics, we define a set of behavioral variables, which we use in a prediction of basic personality traits. We find that predominantly, the Big Five personality traits extraversion and, to some degree, neuroticism are strongly expressed in our data. As an alternative to the Big Five, we investigate whether other linear combinations of the 44 questions underlying the Big Five Inventory are more predictable. In a tertile classification problem, basic dimensionality reduction techniques, such as independent component analysis, increase the predictability relative to the baseline from $11\%$ to $23\%$. Finally, from a supervised linear classifier, we were able to further improve this predictability to $33\%$. In all cases, the most predictable projections had an overweight of the questions related to extraversion and neuroticism. In addition, our findings indicate that the score system underlying the Big Five Inventory disregards a part of the information available in the 44 questions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
