-
Subasa - Adapting Language Models for Low-resourced Offensive Language Detection in Sinhala
Authors:
Shanilka Haturusinghe,
Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya,
Marcos Zampieri,
Christopher M. Homan,
S. R. Liyanage
Abstract:
Accurate detection of offensive language is essential for a number of applications related to social media safety. There is a sharp contrast in performance in this task between low and high-resource languages. In this paper, we adapt fine-tuning strategies that have not been previously explored for Sinhala in the downstream task of offensive language detection. Using this approach, we introduce fo…
▽ More
Accurate detection of offensive language is essential for a number of applications related to social media safety. There is a sharp contrast in performance in this task between low and high-resource languages. In this paper, we adapt fine-tuning strategies that have not been previously explored for Sinhala in the downstream task of offensive language detection. Using this approach, we introduce four models: "Subasa-XLM-R", which incorporates an intermediate Pre-Finetuning step using Masked Rationale Prediction. Two variants of "Subasa-Llama" and "Subasa-Mistral", are fine-tuned versions of Llama (3.2) and Mistral (v0.3), respectively, with a task-specific strategy. We evaluate our models on the SOLD benchmark dataset for Sinhala offensive language detection. All our models outperform existing baselines. Subasa-XLM-R achieves the highest Macro F1 score (0.84) surpassing state-of-the-art large language models like GPT-4o when evaluated on the same SOLD benchmark dataset under zero-shot settings. The models and code are publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT's Capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator and Data Predictor
Authors:
Steven A. Lehr,
Aylin Caliskan,
Suneragiri Liyanage,
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Abstract:
How good a research scientist is ChatGPT? We systematically probed the capabilities of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 across four central components of the scientific process: as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Novel Data Predictor, using psychological science as a testing field. In Study 1 (Research Librarian), unlike human researchers, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 hallucinated, authoritativ…
▽ More
How good a research scientist is ChatGPT? We systematically probed the capabilities of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 across four central components of the scientific process: as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Novel Data Predictor, using psychological science as a testing field. In Study 1 (Research Librarian), unlike human researchers, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 hallucinated, authoritatively generating fictional references 36.0% and 5.4% of the time, respectively, although GPT-4 exhibited an evolving capacity to acknowledge its fictions. In Study 2 (Research Ethicist), GPT-4 (though not GPT-3.5) proved capable of detecting violations like p-hacking in fictional research protocols, correcting 88.6% of blatantly presented issues, and 72.6% of subtly presented issues. In Study 3 (Data Generator), both models consistently replicated patterns of cultural bias previously discovered in large language corpora, indicating that ChatGPT can simulate known results, an antecedent to usefulness for both data generation and skills like hypothesis generation. Contrastingly, in Study 4 (Novel Data Predictor), neither model was successful at predicting new results absent in their training data, and neither appeared to leverage substantially new information when predicting more versus less novel outcomes. Together, these results suggest that GPT is a flawed but rapidly improving librarian, a decent research ethicist already, capable of data generation in simple domains with known characteristics but poor at predicting novel patterns of empirical data to aid future experimentation.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Dizzy: Large-Scale Crawling and Analysis of Onion Services
Authors:
Yazan Boshmaf,
Isuranga Perera,
Udesh Kumarasinghe,
Sajitha Liyanage,
Husam Al Jawaheri
Abstract:
With nearly 2.5m users, onion services have become the prominent part of the darkweb. Over the last five years alone, the number of onion domains has increased 20x, reaching more than 700k unique domains in January 2022. As onion services host various types of illicit content, they have become a valuable resource for darkweb research and an integral part of e-crime investigation and threat intelli…
▽ More
With nearly 2.5m users, onion services have become the prominent part of the darkweb. Over the last five years alone, the number of onion domains has increased 20x, reaching more than 700k unique domains in January 2022. As onion services host various types of illicit content, they have become a valuable resource for darkweb research and an integral part of e-crime investigation and threat intelligence. However, this content is largely un-indexed by today's search engines and researchers have to rely on outdated or manually-collected datasets that are limited in scale, scope, or both.
To tackle this problem, we built Dizzy: An open-source crawling and analysis system for onion services. Dizzy implements novel techniques to explore, update, check, and classify onion services at scale, without overwhelming the Tor network. We deployed Dizzy in April 2021 and used it to analyze more than 63.3m crawled onion webpages, focusing on domain operations, web content, cryptocurrency usage, and web graph. Our main findings show that onion services are unreliable due to their high churn rate, have a relatively small number of reachable domains that are often similar and illicit, enjoy a growing underground cryptocurrency economy, and have a graph that is relatively tightly-knit to, but topologically different from, the regular web's graph.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023; v1 submitted 15 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Experiences with Integrating Custos SecurityServices
Authors:
Isuru Ranawaka,
Samitha Liyanage,
Dannon Baker,
Alexandru Mahmoud,
Juleen Graham,
Terry Fleury,
Dimuthu Wannipurage,
Yu Ma,
Enis Afgan,
Jim Basney,
Suresh Marru,
Marlon Pierce
Abstract:
Science gateways are user-facing cyberinfrastruc-ture that provide researchers and educators with Web-basedaccess to scientific software, computing, and data resources.Managing user identities, accounts, and permissions are essentialtasks for science gateways, and gateways likewise must man-age secure connections between their middleware and remoteresources. The Custos project is an effort to buil…
▽ More
Science gateways are user-facing cyberinfrastruc-ture that provide researchers and educators with Web-basedaccess to scientific software, computing, and data resources.Managing user identities, accounts, and permissions are essentialtasks for science gateways, and gateways likewise must man-age secure connections between their middleware and remoteresources. The Custos project is an effort to build open sourcesoftware that can be operated as a multi-tenanted service thatprovides reliable implementations of common science gatewaycybersecurity needs, including federated authentication, iden-tity management, group and authorization management, andresource credential management. Custos aims further to provideintegrated solutions through these capabilities, delivering end-to-end support for several science gateway usage scenarios. Thispaper examines four deployment scenarios using Custos andassociated extensions beyond previously described work. Thefirst capability illustrated by these scenarios is the need forCustos to provide hierarchical tenant management that allowsmultiple gateway deployments to be federated together andalso to support consolidated, hosted science gateway platformservices. The second capability illustrated by these scenarios is theneed to support service accounts that can support non-browserapplications and agent applications that can act on behalf ofusers on edge resources. We illustrate how the latter can be builtusing Web security standards combined with Custos permissionmanagement mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
KeyXtract Twitter Model - An Essential Keywords Extraction Model for Twitter Designed using NLP Tools
Authors:
Tharindu Weerasooriya,
Nandula Perera,
S. R. Liyanage
Abstract:
Since a tweet is limited to 140 characters, it is ambiguous and difficult for traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools to analyse. This research presents KeyXtract which enhances the machine learning based Stanford CoreNLP Part-of-Speech (POS) tagger with the Twitter model to extract essential keywords from a tweet. The system was developed using rule-based parsers and two corpora. The…
▽ More
Since a tweet is limited to 140 characters, it is ambiguous and difficult for traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools to analyse. This research presents KeyXtract which enhances the machine learning based Stanford CoreNLP Part-of-Speech (POS) tagger with the Twitter model to extract essential keywords from a tweet. The system was developed using rule-based parsers and two corpora. The data for the research was obtained from a Twitter profile of a telecommunication company. The system development consisted of two stages. At the initial stage, a domain specific corpus was compiled after analysing the tweets. The POS tagger extracted the Noun Phrases and Verb Phrases while the parsers removed noise and extracted any other keywords missed by the POS tagger. The system was evaluated using the Turing Test. After it was tested and compared against Stanford CoreNLP, the second stage of the system was developed addressing the shortcomings of the first stage. It was enhanced using Named Entity Recognition and Lemmatization. The second stage was also tested using the Turing test and its pass rate increased from 50.00% to 83.33%. The performance of the final system output was measured using the F1 score. Stanford CoreNLP with the Twitter model had an average F1 of 0.69 while the improved system had a F1 of 0.77. The accuracy of the system could be improved by using a complete domain specific corpus. Since the system used linguistic features of a sentence, it could be applied to other NLP tools.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
