Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Liepvre, D L

4D-CTA Image and geometry dataset for kinematic analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Authors: Mostafa Jamshidian, Adam Wittek, Saeideh Sekhavat, Farah Alkhatib, Jens Carsten Ritter, Paul M. Parizel, Donatien Le Liepvre, Florian Bernard, Ludovic Minvielle, Antoine Fondanèche, Jane Polce, Christopher Wood, Karol Miller

Abstract: This article presents a dataset used in the article "Kinematics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms", published in the Journal of Biomechanics. The dataset is publicly available for download from the Zenodo data repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15477710). The dataset includes time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) captured throughout… ▽ More This article presents a dataset used in the article "Kinematics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms", published in the Journal of Biomechanics. The dataset is publicly available for download from the Zenodo data repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15477710). The dataset includes time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) captured throughout the cardiac cycle from ten patients diagnosed with AAA, along with ten patient-specific AAA geometries extracted from these images. Typically, the 4D-CTA dataset for each patient contains ten electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 3D-CTA image frames acquired over a cardiac cycle, capturing both the systolic and diastolic phases of the AAA configuration. For method verification, the dataset also includes synthetic ground truth data generated from Patient 1's 3D-CTA AAA image in the diastolic phase. The ground truth data includes the patient-specific finite element (FE) biomechanical model and a synthetic systolic 3D-CTA image. The synthetic systolic image was generated by warping Patient 1's diastolic 3D-CTA image using the realistic displacement field obtained from the AAA biomechanical FE model. The images were acquired at Fiona Stanley Hospital in Western Australia and provided to the researchers at the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory at The University of Western Australia (ISML-UWA), where image-based AAA kinematic analysis was performed. Our dataset enabled the analysis of AAA wall displacement and strain throughout the cardiac cycle using a non-invasive, in vivo, image registration-based approach. The use of widely adopted, open-source file formats (NRRD for images and STL for geometries) facilitates broad applicability and reusability in AAA biomechanics studies that require patient-specific geometry and information about AAA kinematics during cardiac cycle. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2025; v1 submitted 23 May, 2025; originally announced May 2025.

Towards personalised assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm structural integrity

Authors: Mostafa Jamshidian, Adam Wittek, Hozan Mufty, Geert Maleux, Inge Fourneau, Elke R. Gizewski, Eva Gassner, Alexander Loizides, Maximilian Lutz, Florian K. Enzmann, Donatien Le Liepvre, Florian Bernard, Ludovic Minvielle, Antoine Fondanèche, Karol Miller

Abstract: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition involving the permanent dilation of the aorta, often detected incidentally through imaging for some other condition. The standard clinical approach to managing AAA follows a one-size-fits-all model based on aneurysm size and growth rate, leading to underestimation or overestimation of rupture risk in individual patients. The widely st… ▽ More Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition involving the permanent dilation of the aorta, often detected incidentally through imaging for some other condition. The standard clinical approach to managing AAA follows a one-size-fits-all model based on aneurysm size and growth rate, leading to underestimation or overestimation of rupture risk in individual patients. The widely studied stress-based rupture risk estimation using computational biomechanics requires wall strength information. However, non-invasive methods for local patient-specific wall strength measurement have not yet been developed. Recently, we introduced an image-based approach for patient-specific, in vivo, non-invasive AAA kinematic analysis using time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images to measure wall strain throughout the cardiac cycle. In the present study, we integrated wall tension computation and strain measurement to develop a novel measure of local structural integrity of AAA wall - Relative Structural Integrity Index (RSII), independent of material properties and thickness of the wall and conditions of blood pressure measurement. Our methods provide a visual map of AAA wall structural integrity for individual patients using only their medical images and blood pressure data. We applied our methods to twelve patients. Additionally, we compared our measure of structural integrity of aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal aortas. Our results show similar values of the wall structural integrity measure across the patients, indicating the reliability of our methods. In line with experimental observations reported in the literature, our analysis revealed that localized low stiffness areas are primarily found in the most dilated AAA regions. Our results clearly demonstrate that the AAA wall is stiffer than the non-aneurysmal aorta. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2025; v1 submitted 13 February, 2025; originally announced February 2025.

Comments: 25 Pages

Abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress: A 7-line code in MATLAB and a one-click software application

Authors: Mostafa Jamshidian, Saeideh Sekhavat, Adam Wittek, Donatien Le Liepvre, Florian Bernard, Ludovic Minvielle, Antoine Fondanèche, Karol Miller

Abstract: An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the irreversible dilation of the lower aorta, usually detected incidentally during imaging for other health issues. Current clinical practice for managing AAA relies on a one-size-fits-all approach, based on the aneurysm's maximum diameter and growth rate, which can lead to underestimation or overestimation of AAA… ▽ More An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the irreversible dilation of the lower aorta, usually detected incidentally during imaging for other health issues. Current clinical practice for managing AAA relies on a one-size-fits-all approach, based on the aneurysm's maximum diameter and growth rate, which can lead to underestimation or overestimation of AAA rupture risk. Patient-specific AAA wall stress, computed using biomechanical models derived from medical images without needing patient-specific material properties, has been widely investigated for developing individualized AAA rupture risk predictors. Therefore, AAA wall stress, determined reliably and quickly, has the potential to enhance patient-specific treatment plans. This paper presents a 7-line code, written in MATLAB using the Partial Differential Equation Toolbox, for AAA wall stress computations via finite element analysis. The code takes AAA wall geometry as input and outputs stress components over the AAA wall domain. Additionally, we present a one-click standalone software application for AAA wall stress computation, developed based on our 7-line code using MATLAB Compiler. After verification, we used our code to compute AAA wall stress in ten patients. Our analysis indicated that the 99th percentile of maximum principal stress across all patients ranged from 0.307 MPa to 0.466 MPa, with an average of 0.380 MPa and a standard deviation of 0.048 MPa. Moreover, for every case, the MATLAB simulation time was less than a minute on a laptop workstation. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2025; v1 submitted 6 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Towards Full Automation of Geometry Extraction for Biomechanical Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm; Neural Network-Based versus Classical Methodologies

Authors: Farah Alkhatib, Mostafa Jamshidian, Donatien Le Liepvre, Florian Bernard, Ludovic Minvielle, Antoine Fondanèche, Elke R. Gizewski, Eva Gassner, Alexander Loizides, Maximilian Lutz, Florian Enzmann, Hozan Mufty, Inge Fourneau, Adam Wittek, Karol Miller

Abstract: Background: For the clinical adoption of stress-based rupture risk estimation in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), a fully automated pipeline, from clinical imaging to biomechanical stress computation, is essential. To this end, we investigated the impact of AI-based image segmentation methods on stress computation results in the walls of AAAs. We compared wall stress distributions and magnitudes… ▽ More Background: For the clinical adoption of stress-based rupture risk estimation in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), a fully automated pipeline, from clinical imaging to biomechanical stress computation, is essential. To this end, we investigated the impact of AI-based image segmentation methods on stress computation results in the walls of AAAs. We compared wall stress distributions and magnitudes calculated from geometry models obtained from classical semi-automated segmentation versus automated neural network-based segmentation. Method: 16 different AAA contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images were semi-automatically segmented by an analyst, taking between 15 and 40 minutes of human effort per patient, depending on image quality. The same images were automatically segmented using PRAEVAorta2 commercial software by NUREA (https://www.nurea-soft.com/), developed based on artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, and automatically post-processed with an in-house MATLAB code, requiring only 1-2 minutes of computer time per patient. Aneurysm wall stress calculations were automatically performed using the BioPARR software (https://bioparr.mech.uwa.edu.au/). Results: Compared to the classical semi-automated segmentation, the automatic neural network-based segmentation leads to equivalent stress distributions, and slightly higher peak and 99th percentile maximum principal stress values. However, our statistical analysis indicated that the differences in AAA wall stress obtained using the two segmentation methods are not statistically significant and fall well within the typical range of inter-analyst and intra-analyst variability. Conclusions: Our findings are a steppingstone toward a fully automated pipeline for biomechanical analysis of AAAs, starting with CT scans and concluding with wall stress assessment. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2025; v1 submitted 11 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 43 pages, 11 figures