-
Belief, knowledge and evidence
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka,
Vinícius Pinto
Abstract:
We present a logical system that combines the well-known classical epistemic concepts of belief and knowledge with a concept of evidence such that the intuitive principle \textit{`evidence yields belief and knowledge'} is satisfied. Our approach relies on previous works of the first author \cite{lewjlc2, lewigpl, lewapal} who introduced a modal system containing $S5$-style principles for the reaso…
▽ More
We present a logical system that combines the well-known classical epistemic concepts of belief and knowledge with a concept of evidence such that the intuitive principle \textit{`evidence yields belief and knowledge'} is satisfied. Our approach relies on previous works of the first author \cite{lewjlc2, lewigpl, lewapal} who introduced a modal system containing $S5$-style principles for the reasoning about intutionistic truth (i.e. \textit{proof}) and, inspired by \cite{artpro}, combined that system with concepts of \textit{intuitionistic} belief and knowledge. We consider that combined system and replace the constructive concept of \textit{proof} with a classical notion of \textit{evidence}. This results in a logic that combines modal system $S5$ with classical epistemic principles where $\square\varphi$ reads as `$\varphi$ is evident' in an epistemic sense. Inspired by \cite{lewapal}, and in contrast to the usual possible worlds semantics found in the literature, we propose here a relational, frame-based semantics where belief and knowledge are not modeled via accessibility relations but directly as sets of propositions (sets of sets of worlds).
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Some remarks on semantics and expressiveness of the Sentential Calculus with Identity
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
Suszko's Sentential Calculus with Identity SCI results from classical propositional calculus CPC by adding a new connective $\equiv$ and axioms for identity $\varphi\equivψ$ (which we interpret here as `propositional identity'). We reformulate the original semantics of SCI in terms of Boolean prealgebras establishing a connection to `hyperintensional semantics'. Furthermore, we define a general fr…
▽ More
Suszko's Sentential Calculus with Identity SCI results from classical propositional calculus CPC by adding a new connective $\equiv$ and axioms for identity $\varphi\equivψ$ (which we interpret here as `propositional identity'). We reformulate the original semantics of SCI in terms of Boolean prealgebras establishing a connection to `hyperintensional semantics'. Furthermore, we define a general framework of dualities between certain SCI-theories and Lewis-style modal systems in the vicinity of S3. Suszko's original approach to two SCI-theories corresponding to S4 and S5 can be formulated as a special case. All these dualities rely particularly on the fact that Lewis' `strict equivalence' is axiomatized by the SCI-principles of `propositional identity'.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Access-based Intuitionistic Knowledge
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
We introduce the concept of access-based intuitionistic knowledge which relies on the intuition that agent $i$ knows $\varphi$ if $i$ has found access to a proof of $\varphi$. Basic principles are distribution and factivity of knowledge as well as $\square\varphi\rightarrow K_i\varphi$ and $K_i(\varphi\veeψ) \rightarrow (K_i\varphi\vee K_iψ)$, where $\square\varphi$ reads `$\varphi$ is proved'. Th…
▽ More
We introduce the concept of access-based intuitionistic knowledge which relies on the intuition that agent $i$ knows $\varphi$ if $i$ has found access to a proof of $\varphi$. Basic principles are distribution and factivity of knowledge as well as $\square\varphi\rightarrow K_i\varphi$ and $K_i(\varphi\veeψ) \rightarrow (K_i\varphi\vee K_iψ)$, where $\square\varphi$ reads `$\varphi$ is proved'. The formalization extends a family of classical modal logics designed in [Lewitzka 2015, 2017, 2019] as combinations of $IPC$ and $CPC$ and as systems for the reasoning about proof, i.e. intuitionistic truth. We adopt a formalization of common knowledge from [Lewitzka 2011] and interpret it here as access-based common knowledge. We compare our proposal with recent approaches to intuitionistic knowledge [Artemov and Protopopescu 2016; Lewitzka 2017, 2019] and bring together these different concepts in a unifying semantic framework based on Heyting algebra expansions.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Reasoning about proof and knowledge
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
In previous work [Lewitzka, Log. J. IGPL 2017], we presented a hierarchy of classical modal systems, along with algebraic semantics, for the reasoning about intuitionistic truth, belief and knowledge. Deviating from Gödel's interpretation of IPC in S4, our modal systems contain IPC in the way established in [Lewitzka, J. Log. Comp. 2015]. The modal operator can be viewed as a predicate for intuiti…
▽ More
In previous work [Lewitzka, Log. J. IGPL 2017], we presented a hierarchy of classical modal systems, along with algebraic semantics, for the reasoning about intuitionistic truth, belief and knowledge. Deviating from Gödel's interpretation of IPC in S4, our modal systems contain IPC in the way established in [Lewitzka, J. Log. Comp. 2015]. The modal operator can be viewed as a predicate for intuitionistic truth, i.e. proof. Epistemic principles are partially adopted from Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic IEL [Artemov and Protopopescu, Rev. Symb. Log. 2016]. In the present paper, we show that the S5-style systems of our hierarchy correspond to an extended Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation and are complete w.r.t. a relational semantics based on intuitionistic general frames. In this sense, our S5-style logics are adequate and complete systems for the reasoning about proof combined with belief or knowledge. The proposed relational semantics is a uniform framework in which also IEL can be modeled. Verification-based intuitionistic knowledge formalized in IEL turns out to be a special case of the kind of knowledge described by our S5-style systems.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2018; v1 submitted 19 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Epistemic extensions of combined classical and intuitionistic propositional logic
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
Logic $L$ was introduced by Lewitzka [7] as a modal system that combines intuitionistic and classical logic: $L$ is a conservative extension of CPC and it contains a copy of IPC via the embedding $\varphi\mapsto\square\varphi$. In this article, we consider $L3$, i.e. $L$ augmented with S3 modal axioms, define basic epistemic extensions and prove completeness w.r.t. algebraic semantics. The resulti…
▽ More
Logic $L$ was introduced by Lewitzka [7] as a modal system that combines intuitionistic and classical logic: $L$ is a conservative extension of CPC and it contains a copy of IPC via the embedding $\varphi\mapsto\square\varphi$. In this article, we consider $L3$, i.e. $L$ augmented with S3 modal axioms, define basic epistemic extensions and prove completeness w.r.t. algebraic semantics. The resulting logics combine classical knowledge and belief with intuitionistic truth. Some epistemic laws of Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic studied by Artemov and Protopopescu [1] are reflected by classical modal principles. In particular, the implications "intuitionistic truth $\Rightarrow$ knowledge $\Rightarrow$ classical truth" are represented by the theorems $\square\varphi\rightarrow K\varphi$ and $K\varphi\rightarrow\varphi$ of our logic $EL3$, where we are dealing with classical instead of intuitionistic knowledge. Finally, we show that a modification of our semantics yields algebraic models for the systems of Intuitionistic Epistemic Logic introduced in [1].
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2017; v1 submitted 4 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Combining intermediate propositional logics with classical logic
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
In [17], we introduced a modal logic, called $L$, which combines intuitionistic propositional logic $IPC$ and classical propositional logic $CPC$ and is complete w.r.t. an algebraic semantics. However, $L$ seems to be too weak for Kripke-style semantics. In this paper, we add positive and negative introspection and show that the resulting logic $L5$ has a Kripke semantics. For intermediate logics…
▽ More
In [17], we introduced a modal logic, called $L$, which combines intuitionistic propositional logic $IPC$ and classical propositional logic $CPC$ and is complete w.r.t. an algebraic semantics. However, $L$ seems to be too weak for Kripke-style semantics. In this paper, we add positive and negative introspection and show that the resulting logic $L5$ has a Kripke semantics. For intermediate logics $I$, we consider the parametrized versions $L5(I)$ of $L5$ where $IPC$ is replaced by $I$. $L5(I)$ can be seen as a classical modal logic for the reasoning about truth in $I$. From our results, we derive a simple method for determining algebraic and Kripke semantics for some specific intermediate logics. We discuss some examples which are of interest for Computer Science, namely the Logic of Here-and-There, Gödel-Dummett Logic and Jankov Logic. Our method provides new proofs of completeness theorems due to Hosoi, Dummett/Horn and Jankov, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Topological representation of intuitionistic and distributive abstract logics
Authors:
Andreas B. M. Brunner,
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
We continue work of our earlier paper (Lewitzka and Brunner: Minimally generated abstract logics, Logica Universalis 3(2), 2009), where abstract logics and particularly intuitionistic abstract logics are studied. Abstract logics can be topologized in a direct and natural way. This facilitates a topological study of classes of concrete logics whenever they are given in abstract form. Moreover, such…
▽ More
We continue work of our earlier paper (Lewitzka and Brunner: Minimally generated abstract logics, Logica Universalis 3(2), 2009), where abstract logics and particularly intuitionistic abstract logics are studied. Abstract logics can be topologized in a direct and natural way. This facilitates a topological study of classes of concrete logics whenever they are given in abstract form. Moreover, such a direct topological approach avoids the often complex algebraic and lattice-theoretic machinery usually applied to represent logics. Motivated by that point of view, we define in this paper the category of intuitionistic abstract logics with stable logic maps as morphisms, and the category of implicative spectral spaces with spectral maps as morphisms. We show the equivalence of these categories and conclude that the larger categories of distributive abstract logics and distributive sober spaces are equivalent, too.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
A modal logic amalgam of classical and intuitionistic propositional logic
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
A famous result, conjectured by Gödel in 1932 and proved by McKinsey and Tarski in 1948, says that $\varphi$ is a theorem of intuitionistic propositional logic IPC iff its Gödel-translation $\varphi'$ is a theorem of modal logic S4. In this paper, we extend an intuitionistic version of modal logic S1+SP, introduced in our previous paper (S. Lewitzka, Algebraic semantics for a modal logic close to…
▽ More
A famous result, conjectured by Gödel in 1932 and proved by McKinsey and Tarski in 1948, says that $\varphi$ is a theorem of intuitionistic propositional logic IPC iff its Gödel-translation $\varphi'$ is a theorem of modal logic S4. In this paper, we extend an intuitionistic version of modal logic S1+SP, introduced in our previous paper (S. Lewitzka, Algebraic semantics for a modal logic close to S1, J. Logic and Comp., doi:10.1093/logcom/exu067) to a classical modal logic L and prove the following: a propositional formula $\varphi$ is a theorem of IPC iff $\square\varphi$ is a theorem of L (actually, we show: $Φ\vdash_{IPC}\varphi$ iff $\squareΦ\vdash_L\square\varphi$, for propositional $Φ,\varphi$). Thus, the map $\varphi\mapsto\square\varphi$ is an embedding of IPC into L, i.e. L contains a copy of IPC. Moreover, L is a conservative extension of classical propositional logic CPC. In this sense, L is an amalgam of CPC and IPC. We show that L is sound and complete w.r.t. a class of special Heyting algebras with a (non-normal) modal operator.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 9 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Algebraic semantics for a modal logic close to S1
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
The modal systems S1--S3 were introduced by C. I. Lewis as logics for strict implication. While there are Kripke semantics for S2 and S3, there is no known natural semantics for S1. We extend S1 by a Substitution Principle SP which generalizes a reference rule of S1. In system S1+SP, the relation of strict equivalence $\varphi\equivψ$ satisfies the identity axioms of R. Suszko's non-Fregean logic…
▽ More
The modal systems S1--S3 were introduced by C. I. Lewis as logics for strict implication. While there are Kripke semantics for S2 and S3, there is no known natural semantics for S1. We extend S1 by a Substitution Principle SP which generalizes a reference rule of S1. In system S1+SP, the relation of strict equivalence $\varphi\equivψ$ satisfies the identity axioms of R. Suszko's non-Fregean logic adapted to the language of modal logic (we call these axioms the axioms of propositional identity). This enables us to develop a framework of algebraic semantics which captures S1+SP as well as the Lewis systems S3--S5. So from the viewpoint of algebraic semantics, S1+SP turns out to be an interesting modal logic. We show that S1+SP is strictly contained between S1 and S3 and differs from S2. It is the weakest modal logic containing S1 such that strict equivalence is axiomatized by propositional identity.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2014; v1 submitted 25 April, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Denotational semantics for modal systems S3--S5 extended by axioms for propositional quantifiers and identity
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
There are logics where necessity is defined by means of a given identity connective: $\square\varphi := \varphi\equiv\top$ ($\top$ is a tautology). On the other hand, in many standard modal logics the concept of propositional identity (PI) $\varphi\equivψ$ can be defined by strict equivalence (SE) $\square(\varphi\leftrightarrowψ)$. All these approaches to modality involve a principle that we call…
▽ More
There are logics where necessity is defined by means of a given identity connective: $\square\varphi := \varphi\equiv\top$ ($\top$ is a tautology). On the other hand, in many standard modal logics the concept of propositional identity (PI) $\varphi\equivψ$ can be defined by strict equivalence (SE) $\square(\varphi\leftrightarrowψ)$. All these approaches to modality involve a principle that we call the Collapse Axiom (CA): "There is only one necessary proposition." In this paper, we consider a notion of PI which relies on the identity axioms of Suszko's non-Fregean logic $\mathit{SCI}$. Then $S3$ proves to be the smallest Lewis modal system where PI can be defined as SE. We extend $S3$ to a non-Fregean logic with propositional quantifiers such that necessity and PI are integrated as non-interdefinable concepts. CA is not valid and PI refines SE. Models are expansions of $\mathit{SCI}$-models. We show that $\mathit{SCI}$-models are Boolean prealgebras, and vice-versa. This associates Non-Fregean Logic with research on Hyperintensional Semantics. PI equals SE iff models are Boolean algebras and CA holds. A representation result establishes a connection to Fine's approach to propositional quantifiers and shows that our theories are \textit{conservative} extensions of $S3$--$S5$, respectively. If we exclude the Barcan formula and a related axiom, then the resulting systems are still complete w.r.t. a simpler denotational semantics.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2014; v1 submitted 28 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
-
On some many-valued abstract logics and their Epsilon-T-style extensions
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
Logical systems with classical negation and means for sentential or propositional self-reference involve, in some way, paradoxical statements such as the liar. However, the paradox disappears if one replaces classical by an appropriate non-classical negation such as a paraconsistent one (no paradox arises if the liar is both true and false). We consider a non-Fregean logic which is a revised and e…
▽ More
Logical systems with classical negation and means for sentential or propositional self-reference involve, in some way, paradoxical statements such as the liar. However, the paradox disappears if one replaces classical by an appropriate non-classical negation such as a paraconsistent one (no paradox arises if the liar is both true and false). We consider a non-Fregean logic which is a revised and extended version (Lewitzka 2012) of Epsilon-T-Logic originally introduced by (Straeter 1992) as a logic with a total truth predicate and propositional quantifiers. Self-reference is achieved by means of equations between formulas which are interpreted over a model-theoretic universe of propositions. Paradoxical statements, such as the liar, can be asserted only by unsatisfiable equations and do not correlate with propositions. In this paper, we generalize Epsilon-T-Logic to a four-valued logic related to Dunn/Belnap logic B_4. We also define three-valued versions related to Kleene's logic K_3 and Priest's Logic of Paradox P_3, respectively. In this many-valued setting, models may contain liars and other "paradoxical" propositions which are ruled out by the more restrictive classical semantics. We introduce these many-valued non-Fregean logics as extensions of abstract parameter logics such that parameter logic and extension are of the same logical type. For this purpose, we define and study abstract logics of type B_4, K_3 and P_3. Using semantic methods we show compactness of the consequence relation of abstract logics of type B_4, give a representation as minimally generated logics and establish a connection to the approach of (Font 1997). Finally, we present a complete sequent calculus for the Epsilon-T-style extension of classical abstract logics simplifying constructions originally developed by (Straeter 1992, Zeitz 2000, Lewitzka 1998).
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
Necessity as justified truth
Authors:
Steffen Lewitzka
Abstract:
We present a logic for the reasoning about necessity and justifications which is independent from relational semantics. We choose the concept of justification -- coming from a class of "Justification Logics" (Artemov 2008, Fitting 2009) -- as the primitive notion on which the concept of necessity is based. Our axiomatization extends Suszko's non-Fregean logic SCI (Brown, Suszko 1972) by basic axio…
▽ More
We present a logic for the reasoning about necessity and justifications which is independent from relational semantics. We choose the concept of justification -- coming from a class of "Justification Logics" (Artemov 2008, Fitting 2009) -- as the primitive notion on which the concept of necessity is based. Our axiomatization extends Suszko's non-Fregean logic SCI (Brown, Suszko 1972) by basic axioms from Justification Logic, axioms for quantification over propositions and over justifications, and some further principles. The core axiom is: $\varphi$ is necessarily true iff there is a justification for $\varphi$. That is, necessity is first-order definable by means of justifications. Instead of defining purely algebraic models in the style of (Brown, Suszko 1972) we extend the semantics investigated in (Lewitzka 2012) by some algebraic structure for dealing with justifications and prove soundness and completeness of our deductive system. Moreover, we are able to restore the modal logic principle of Necessitation if we add the axiom schema $\square\varphi \to \square\square\varphi$ and a rule of Axiom Necessitation to our system. As a main result, we show that the modal logics S4 and S5 can be captured by our semantics if we impose the corresponding modal logic principles as additional semantic constraints. This will follow from proof-theoretic considerations and from our completeness theorems. For the system S4 we present also a purely model-theoretic proof.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2012; v1 submitted 16 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
