Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Lettmann, M P

A Tableaux Calculus for Reducing Proof Size

Authors: Michael Peter Lettmann, Nicolas Peltier

Abstract: A tableau calculus is proposed, based on a compressed representation of clauses, where literals sharing a similar shape may be merged. The inferences applied on these literals are fused when possible, which reduces the size of the proof. It is shown that the obtained proof procedure is sound, refutationally complete and allows to reduce the size of the tableau by an exponential factor. The approac… ▽ More A tableau calculus is proposed, based on a compressed representation of clauses, where literals sharing a similar shape may be merged. The inferences applied on these literals are fused when possible, which reduces the size of the proof. It is shown that the obtained proof procedure is sound, refutationally complete and allows to reduce the size of the tableau by an exponential factor. The approach is compatible with all usual refinements of tableaux. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: Technical Report

Integrating a Global Induction Mechanism into a Sequent Calculus

Authors: David M. Cerna, Michael Peter Lettmann

Abstract: Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which requires an extension of the LK-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used calculi for induction contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the valid proof theoretic properties of the calculus. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such calculi which allow cut-elimination to a normal form with the subformula pro… ▽ More Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which requires an extension of the LK-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used calculi for induction contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the valid proof theoretic properties of the calculus. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such calculi which allow cut-elimination to a normal form with the subformula property, i.e. every formula occurring in the proof is a subformula of the end sequent. Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate induction by linking proofs together. There exists a schematic normal form which has comparable proof theoretic behaviour to normal forms with the subformula property. However, a calculus for the construction of proof schemata does not exist. In this paper, we introduce a calculus for proof schemata and prove soundness and completeness with respect to a fragment of the inductive arguments formalizable in Peano arithmetic. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: 16 pages

The problem of Pi_2-cut-introduction

Authors: Alexander Leitsch, Michael Peter Lettmann

Abstract: We describe an algorithmic method of proof compression based on the introduction of Pi_2-cuts into a cut-free LK-proof. The current approach is based on an inversion of Gentzen s cut-elimination method and extends former methods for introducing Pi_1-cuts. The Herbrand instances of a cut-free proof pi of a sequent S are described by a grammar G which encodes substitutions defined in the elimination… ▽ More We describe an algorithmic method of proof compression based on the introduction of Pi_2-cuts into a cut-free LK-proof. The current approach is based on an inversion of Gentzen s cut-elimination method and extends former methods for introducing Pi_1-cuts. The Herbrand instances of a cut-free proof pi of a sequent S are described by a grammar G which encodes substitutions defined in the elimination of quantified cuts. We present an algorithm which, given a grammar G, constructs a Pi_2-cut formula A and a proof phi of S with one cut on A. It is shown that, by this algorithm, we can achieve an exponential proof compression. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2018; v1 submitted 24 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: 52 pages

ACM Class: F.4.1; I.2.3