Showing 1–22 of 22 results for author: Lesot, M

Did I Faithfully Say What I Thought? Bridging the Gap Between Neural Activity and Self-Explanations in Large Language Models

Authors: Milan Bhan, Jean-Noel Vittaut, Nicolas Chesneau, Sarath Chandar, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLM) have demonstrated the capability of generating free text self Natural Language Explanation (self-NLE) to justify their answers. Despite their logical appearance, self-NLE do not necessarily reflect the LLM actual decision-making process, making such explanations unfaithful. While existing methods for measuring self-NLE faithfulness mostly rely on behavioral tests or com… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLM) have demonstrated the capability of generating free text self Natural Language Explanation (self-NLE) to justify their answers. Despite their logical appearance, self-NLE do not necessarily reflect the LLM actual decision-making process, making such explanations unfaithful. While existing methods for measuring self-NLE faithfulness mostly rely on behavioral tests or computational block identification, none of them examines the neural activity underlying the model's reasoning. This work introduces a novel flexible framework for quantitatively measuring the faithfulness of LLM-generated self-NLE by directly comparing the latter with interpretations of the model's internal hidden states. The proposed framework is versatile and provides deep insights into self-NLE faithfulness by establishing a direct connection between self-NLE and model reasoning. This approach advances the understanding of self-NLE faithfulness and provides building blocks for generating more faithful self-NLE. △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2025; v1 submitted 10 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Towards Achieving Concept Completeness for Textual Concept Bottleneck Models

Authors: Milan Bhan, Yann Choho, Pierre Moreau, Jean-Noel Vittaut, Nicolas Chesneau, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: Textual Concept Bottleneck Models (TCBMs) are interpretable-by-design models for text classification that predict a set of salient concepts before making the final prediction. This paper proposes Complete Textual Concept Bottleneck Model (CT-CBM), a novel TCBM generator building concept labels in a fully unsupervised manner using a small language model, eliminating both the need for predefined hum… ▽ More Textual Concept Bottleneck Models (TCBMs) are interpretable-by-design models for text classification that predict a set of salient concepts before making the final prediction. This paper proposes Complete Textual Concept Bottleneck Model (CT-CBM), a novel TCBM generator building concept labels in a fully unsupervised manner using a small language model, eliminating both the need for predefined human labeled concepts and LLM annotations. CT-CBM iteratively targets and adds important and identifiable concepts in the bottleneck layer to create a complete concept basis. CT-CBM achieves striking results against competitors in terms of concept basis completeness and concept detection accuracy, offering a promising solution to reliably enhance interpretability of NLP classifiers. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2025; v1 submitted 16 February, 2025; originally announced February 2025.

An action language-based formalisation of an abstract argumentation framework

Authors: Yann Munro, Camilo Sarmiento, Isabelle Bloch, Gauvain Bourgne, Catherine Pelachaud, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: An abstract argumentation framework is a commonly used formalism to provide a static representation of a dialogue. However, the order of enunciation of the arguments in an argumentative dialogue is very important and can affect the outcome of this dialogue. In this paper, we propose a new framework for modelling abstract argumentation graphs, a model that incorporates the order of enunciation of a… ▽ More An abstract argumentation framework is a commonly used formalism to provide a static representation of a dialogue. However, the order of enunciation of the arguments in an argumentative dialogue is very important and can affect the outcome of this dialogue. In this paper, we propose a new framework for modelling abstract argumentation graphs, a model that incorporates the order of enunciation of arguments. By taking this order into account, we have the means to deduce a unique outcome for each dialogue, called an extension. We also establish several properties, such as termination and correctness, and discuss two notions of completeness. In particular, we propose a modification of the previous transformation based on a "last enunciated last updated" strategy, which verifies the second form of completeness. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2024; originally announced September 2024.

Comments: To be published in The 25th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems

Why do explanations fail? A typology and discussion on failures in XAI

Authors: Clara Bove, Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Charles Tijus, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: As Machine Learning (ML) models achieve unprecedented levels of performance, the XAI domain aims at making these models understandable by presenting end-users with intelligible explanations. Yet, some existing XAI approaches fail to meet expectations: several issues have been reported in the literature, generally pointing out either technical limitations or misinterpretations by users. In this pap… ▽ More As Machine Learning (ML) models achieve unprecedented levels of performance, the XAI domain aims at making these models understandable by presenting end-users with intelligible explanations. Yet, some existing XAI approaches fail to meet expectations: several issues have been reported in the literature, generally pointing out either technical limitations or misinterpretations by users. In this paper, we argue that the resulting harms arise from a complex overlap of multiple failures in XAI, which existing ad-hoc studies fail to capture. This work therefore advocates for a holistic perspective, presenting a systematic investigation of limitations of current XAI methods and their impact on the interpretation of explanations. By distinguishing between system-specific and user-specific failures, we propose a typological framework that helps revealing the nuanced complexities of explanation failures. Leveraging this typology, we also discuss some research directions to help AI practitioners better understand the limitations of XAI systems and enhance the quality of ML explanations. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Mitigating Text Toxicity with Counterfactual Generation

Authors: Milan Bhan, Jean-Noel Vittaut, Nina Achache, Victor Legrand, Nicolas Chesneau, Annabelle Blangero, Juliette Murris, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: Toxicity mitigation consists in rephrasing text in order to remove offensive or harmful meaning. Neural natural language processing (NLP) models have been widely used to target and mitigate textual toxicity. However, existing methods fail to detoxify text while preserving the initial non-toxic meaning at the same time. In this work, we propose to apply counterfactual generation methods from the eX… ▽ More Toxicity mitigation consists in rephrasing text in order to remove offensive or harmful meaning. Neural natural language processing (NLP) models have been widely used to target and mitigate textual toxicity. However, existing methods fail to detoxify text while preserving the initial non-toxic meaning at the same time. In this work, we propose to apply counterfactual generation methods from the eXplainable AI (XAI) field to target and mitigate textual toxicity. In particular, we perform text detoxification by applying local feature importance and counterfactual generation methods to a toxicity classifier distinguishing between toxic and non-toxic texts. We carry out text detoxification through counterfactual generation on three datasets and compare our approach to three competitors. Automatic and human evaluations show that recently developed NLP counterfactual generators can mitigate toxicity accurately while better preserving the meaning of the initial text as compared to classical detoxification methods. Finally, we take a step back from using automated detoxification tools, and discuss how to manage the polysemous nature of toxicity and the risk of malicious use of detoxification tools. This work is the first to bridge the gap between counterfactual generation and text detoxification and paves the way towards more practical application of XAI methods. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2025; v1 submitted 16 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Self-AMPLIFY: Improving Small Language Models with Self Post Hoc Explanations

Authors: Milan Bhan, Jean-Noel Vittaut, Nicolas Chesneau, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: Incorporating natural language rationales in the prompt and In-Context Learning (ICL) have led to a significant improvement of Large Language Models (LLMs) performance. However, generating high-quality rationales require human-annotation or the use of auxiliary proxy models. In this work, we propose Self-AMPLIFY to automatically generate rationales from post hoc explanation methods applied to Smal… ▽ More Incorporating natural language rationales in the prompt and In-Context Learning (ICL) have led to a significant improvement of Large Language Models (LLMs) performance. However, generating high-quality rationales require human-annotation or the use of auxiliary proxy models. In this work, we propose Self-AMPLIFY to automatically generate rationales from post hoc explanation methods applied to Small Language Models (SLMs) to improve their own performance. Self-AMPLIFY is a 3-step method that targets samples, generates rationales and builds a final prompt to leverage ICL. Self-AMPLIFY performance is evaluated on four SLMs and five datasets requiring strong reasoning abilities. Self-AMPLIFY achieves good results against competitors, leading to strong accuracy improvement. Self-AMPLIFY is the first method to apply post hoc explanation methods to autoregressive language models to generate rationales to improve their own performance in a fully automated manner. △ Less

Submitted 17 June, 2024; v1 submitted 19 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules

Authors: Adam Rida, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Xavier Renard, Christophe Marsala

Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) methods have mostly been built to investigate and shed light on single machine learning models and are not designed to capture and explain differences between multiple models effectively. This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models, which is crucial for model selection, monitoring and lifecycle management in re… ▽ More Explainable AI (XAI) methods have mostly been built to investigate and shed light on single machine learning models and are not designed to capture and explain differences between multiple models effectively. This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models, which is crucial for model selection, monitoring and lifecycle management in real-world applications. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations describing the differences between two binary classifiers. To assess the effectiveness of DeltaXplainer, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, covering various model comparison scenarios involving different types of concept drift. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Achieving Diversity in Counterfactual Explanations: a Review and Discussion

Authors: Thibault Laugel, Adulam Jeyasothy, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: In the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), counterfactual examples explain to a user the predictions of a trained decision model by indicating the modifications to be made to the instance so as to change its associated prediction. These counterfactual examples are generally defined as solutions to an optimization problem whose cost function combines several criteria that quantify d… ▽ More In the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), counterfactual examples explain to a user the predictions of a trained decision model by indicating the modifications to be made to the instance so as to change its associated prediction. These counterfactual examples are generally defined as solutions to an optimization problem whose cost function combines several criteria that quantify desiderata for a good explanation meeting user needs. A large variety of such appropriate properties can be considered, as the user needs are generally unknown and differ from one user to another; their selection and formalization is difficult. To circumvent this issue, several approaches propose to generate, rather than a single one, a set of diverse counterfactual examples to explain a prediction. This paper proposes a review of the numerous, sometimes conflicting, definitions that have been proposed for this notion of diversity. It discusses their underlying principles as well as the hypotheses on the user needs they rely on and proposes to categorize them along several dimensions (explicit vs implicit, universe in which they are defined, level at which they apply), leading to the identification of further research challenges on this topic. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

TIGTEC : Token Importance Guided TExt Counterfactuals

Authors: Milan Bhan, Jean-Noel Vittaut, Nicolas Chesneau, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Abstract: Counterfactual examples explain a prediction by highlighting changes of instance that flip the outcome of a classifier. This paper proposes TIGTEC, an efficient and modular method for generating sparse, plausible and diverse counterfactual explanations for textual data. TIGTEC is a text editing heuristic that targets and modifies words with high contribution using local feature importance. A new a… ▽ More Counterfactual examples explain a prediction by highlighting changes of instance that flip the outcome of a classifier. This paper proposes TIGTEC, an efficient and modular method for generating sparse, plausible and diverse counterfactual explanations for textual data. TIGTEC is a text editing heuristic that targets and modifies words with high contribution using local feature importance. A new attention-based local feature importance is proposed. Counterfactual candidates are generated and assessed with a cost function integrating semantic distance, while the solution space is efficiently explored in a beam search fashion. The conducted experiments show the relevance of TIGTEC in terms of success rate, sparsity, diversity and plausibility. This method can be used in both model-specific or model-agnostic way, which makes it very convenient for generating counterfactual explanations. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Integrating Temporality and Causality into Acyclic Argumentation Frameworks using a Transition System

Authors: Y. Munro, C. Sarmiento, I. Bloch, G. Bourgne, M. -J. Lesot

Abstract: In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of considering temporality, i.e. the order in which arguments are enunciated, as well as causality. We propose a formal method to rewrite the concepts of acyclic abstract argumentation frameworks into an action language, that allows us to model the evolution of the world, and to establish causal relationships between the enunciation… ▽ More In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of considering temporality, i.e. the order in which arguments are enunciated, as well as causality. We propose a formal method to rewrite the concepts of acyclic abstract argumentation frameworks into an action language, that allows us to model the evolution of the world, and to establish causal relationships between the enunciation of arguments and their consequences, whether direct or indirect. An Answer Set Programming implementation is also proposed, as well as perspectives towards explanations. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2024; v1 submitted 16 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Integrating Prior Knowledge in Post-hoc Explanations

Authors: Adulam Jeyasothy, Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: In the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), post-hoc interpretability methods aim at explaining to a user the predictions of a trained decision model. Integrating prior knowledge into such interpretability methods aims at improving the explanation understandability and allowing for personalised explanations adapted to each user. In this paper, we propose to define a cost function th… ▽ More In the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), post-hoc interpretability methods aim at explaining to a user the predictions of a trained decision model. Integrating prior knowledge into such interpretability methods aims at improving the explanation understandability and allowing for personalised explanations adapted to each user. In this paper, we propose to define a cost function that explicitly integrates prior knowledge into the interpretability objectives: we present a general framework for the optimization problem of post-hoc interpretability methods, and show that user knowledge can thus be integrated to any method by adding a compatibility term in the cost function. We instantiate the proposed formalization in the case of counterfactual explanations and propose a new interpretability method called Knowledge Integration in Counterfactual Explanation (KICE) to optimize it. The paper performs an experimental study on several benchmark data sets to characterize the counterfactual instances generated by KICE, as compared to reference methods. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: preprint

Fuzzy Conceptual Graphs: a comparative discussion

Authors: Adam Faci, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Claire Laudy

Abstract: Conceptual Graphs (CG) are a graph-based knowledge representation and reasoning formalism; fuzzy Conceptual Graphs (fCG) constitute an extension that enriches their expressiveness, exploiting the fuzzy set theory so as to relax their constraints at various levels. This paper proposes a comparative study of existing approaches over their respective advantages and possible limitations. The discussio… ▽ More Conceptual Graphs (CG) are a graph-based knowledge representation and reasoning formalism; fuzzy Conceptual Graphs (fCG) constitute an extension that enriches their expressiveness, exploiting the fuzzy set theory so as to relax their constraints at various levels. This paper proposes a comparative study of existing approaches over their respective advantages and possible limitations. The discussion revolves around three axes: (a) Critical view of each approach and comparison with previous propositions from the state of the art; (b) Presentation of the many possible interpretations of each definition to illustrate its potential and its limits; (c) Clarification of the part of CG impacted by the definition as well as the relaxed constraint. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Journal ref: Proc. of the Int. Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT2021), Sep 2021, Bratislava, Slovakia

cgSpan: Pattern Mining in Conceptual Graphs

Authors: Adam Faci, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Claire Laudy

Abstract: Conceptual Graphs (CGs) are a graph-based knowledge representation formalism. In this paper we propose cgSpan a CG frequent pattern mining algorithm. It extends the DMGM-GSM algorithm that takes taxonomy-based labeled graphs as input; it includes three more kinds of knowledge of the CG formalism: (a) the fixed arity of relation nodes, handling graphs of neighborhoods centered on relations rather t… ▽ More Conceptual Graphs (CGs) are a graph-based knowledge representation formalism. In this paper we propose cgSpan a CG frequent pattern mining algorithm. It extends the DMGM-GSM algorithm that takes taxonomy-based labeled graphs as input; it includes three more kinds of knowledge of the CG formalism: (a) the fixed arity of relation nodes, handling graphs of neighborhoods centered on relations rather than graphs of nodes, (b) the signatures, avoiding patterns with concept types more general than the maximal types specified in signatures and (c) the inference rules, applying them during the pattern mining process. The experimental study highlights that cgSpan is a functional CG Frequent Pattern Mining algorithm and that including CGs specificities results in a faster algorithm with more expressive results and less redundancy with vocabulary. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Journal ref: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC2021), Jun 2021, Zakopane, Poland

CG2A: Conceptual Graphs Generation Algorithm

Authors: Adam Faci, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Claire Laudy

Abstract: Conceptual Graphs (CGs) are a formalism to represent knowledge. However producing a CG database is complex. To the best of our knowledge, existing methods do not fully use the expressivity of CGs. It is particularly troublesome as it is necessary to have CG databases to test and validate algorithms running on CGs. This paper proposes CG2A, an algorithm to build synthetic CGs exploiting most of the… ▽ More Conceptual Graphs (CGs) are a formalism to represent knowledge. However producing a CG database is complex. To the best of our knowledge, existing methods do not fully use the expressivity of CGs. It is particularly troublesome as it is necessary to have CG databases to test and validate algorithms running on CGs. This paper proposes CG2A, an algorithm to build synthetic CGs exploiting most of their expressivity. CG2A takes as input constraints that constitute ontological knowledge including a vocabulary and a set of CGs with some label variables, called $γ$-CGs, as components of the generated CGs. Extensions also enable the automatic generation of the set of $γ$-CGs and vocabulary to ease the database generation and increase variability. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Journal ref: Proc. of the Int. Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT2021), Sep 2021, Bratislava, Slovakia

The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanations

Authors: Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Xavier Renard, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: Post-hoc interpretability approaches have been proven to be powerful tools to generate explanations for the predictions made by a trained black-box model. However, they create the risk of having explanations that are a result of some artifacts learned by the model instead of actual knowledge from the data. This paper focuses on the case of counterfactual explanations and asks whether the generated… ▽ More Post-hoc interpretability approaches have been proven to be powerful tools to generate explanations for the predictions made by a trained black-box model. However, they create the risk of having explanations that are a result of some artifacts learned by the model instead of actual knowledge from the data. This paper focuses on the case of counterfactual explanations and asks whether the generated instances can be justified, i.e. continuously connected to some ground-truth data. We evaluate the risk of generating unjustified counterfactual examples by investigating the local neighborhoods of instances whose predictions are to be explained and show that this risk is quite high for several datasets. Furthermore, we show that most state of the art approaches do not differentiate justified from unjustified counterfactual examples, leading to less useful explanations. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Issues with post-hoc counterfactual explanations: a discussion

Authors: Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: Counterfactual post-hoc interpretability approaches have been proven to be useful tools to generate explanations for the predictions of a trained blackbox classifier. However, the assumptions they make about the data and the classifier make them unreliable in many contexts. In this paper, we discuss three desirable properties and approaches to quantify them: proximity, connectedness and stability.… ▽ More Counterfactual post-hoc interpretability approaches have been proven to be useful tools to generate explanations for the predictions of a trained blackbox classifier. However, the assumptions they make about the data and the classifier make them unreliable in many contexts. In this paper, we discuss three desirable properties and approaches to quantify them: proximity, connectedness and stability. In addition, we illustrate that there is a risk for post-hoc counterfactual approaches to not satisfy these properties. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: presented at 2019 ICML Workshop on Human in the Loop Learning (HILL 2019), Long Beach, USA

Detecting Potential Local Adversarial Examples for Human-Interpretable Defense

Authors: Xavier Renard, Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly used in the industry to make decisions such as credit insurance approval. Some people may be tempted to manipulate specific variables, such as the age or the salary, in order to get better chances of approval. In this ongoing work, we propose to discuss, with a first proposition, the issue of detecting a potential local adversarial example on classical tabu… ▽ More Machine learning models are increasingly used in the industry to make decisions such as credit insurance approval. Some people may be tempted to manipulate specific variables, such as the age or the salary, in order to get better chances of approval. In this ongoing work, we propose to discuss, with a first proposition, the issue of detecting a potential local adversarial example on classical tabular data by providing to a human expert the locally critical features for the classifier's decision, in order to control the provided information and avoid a fraud. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Comments: presented at 2018 ECML/PKDD Workshop on Recent Advances in Adversarial Machine Learning (Nemesis 2018), Dublin, Ireland

Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablity

Authors: Thibault Laugel, Xavier Renard, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: Local surrogate models, to approximate the local decision boundary of a black-box classifier, constitute one approach to generate explanations for the rationale behind an individual prediction made by the back-box. This paper highlights the importance of defining the right locality, the neighborhood on which a local surrogate is trained, in order to approximate accurately the local black-box decis… ▽ More Local surrogate models, to approximate the local decision boundary of a black-box classifier, constitute one approach to generate explanations for the rationale behind an individual prediction made by the back-box. This paper highlights the importance of defining the right locality, the neighborhood on which a local surrogate is trained, in order to approximate accurately the local black-box decision boundary. Unfortunately, as shown in this paper, this issue is not only a parameter or sampling distribution challenge and has a major impact on the relevance and quality of the approximation of the local black-box decision boundary and thus on the meaning and accuracy of the generated explanation. To overcome the identified problems, quantified with an adapted measure and procedure, we propose to generate surrogate-based explanations for individual predictions based on a sampling centered on particular place of the decision boundary, relevant for the prediction to be explained, rather than on the prediction itself as it is classically done. We evaluate the novel approach compared to state-of-the-art methods and a straightforward improvement thereof on four UCI datasets. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: presented at 2018 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2018), Stockholm, Sweden

Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learning

Authors: Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Xavier Renard, Marcin Detyniecki

Abstract: In the context of post-hoc interpretability, this paper addresses the task of explaining the prediction of a classifier, considering the case where no information is available, neither on the classifier itself, nor on the processed data (neither the training nor the test data). It proposes an instance-based approach whose principle consists in determining the minimal changes needed to alter a pred… ▽ More In the context of post-hoc interpretability, this paper addresses the task of explaining the prediction of a classifier, considering the case where no information is available, neither on the classifier itself, nor on the processed data (neither the training nor the test data). It proposes an instance-based approach whose principle consists in determining the minimal changes needed to alter a prediction: given a data point whose classification must be explained, the proposed method consists in identifying a close neighbour classified differently, where the closeness definition integrates a sparsity constraint. This principle is implemented using observation generation in the Growing Spheres algorithm. Experimental results on two datasets illustrate the relevance of the proposed approach that can be used to gain knowledge about the classifier. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: preprint

Overlapping Community Detection by Local Decentralised Vertex-centred Process

Authors: Maël Canu, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Adrien Revault d'Allonnes

Abstract: This paper focuses on the identification of overlapping communities, allowing nodes to simultaneously belong to several communities, in a decentralised way. To that aim it proposes LOCNeSs, an algorithm specially designed to run in a decentralised environment and to limit propagation, two essential characteristics to be applied in mobile networks. It is based on the exploitation of the preferentia… ▽ More This paper focuses on the identification of overlapping communities, allowing nodes to simultaneously belong to several communities, in a decentralised way. To that aim it proposes LOCNeSs, an algorithm specially designed to run in a decentralised environment and to limit propagation, two essential characteristics to be applied in mobile networks. It is based on the exploitation of the preferential attachment mechanism in networks. Experimental results show that LOCNeSs is stable and achieves good overlapping vertex identification. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: IEEE Computer Society. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW'16), Dec 2016, Barcelone, Spain

Vertex-centred Method to Detect Communities in Evolving Networks

Authors: Maël Canu, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Adrien Revault d'Allonnes

Abstract: Finding communities in evolving networks is a difficult task and raises issues different from the classic static detection case. We introduce an approach based on the recent vertex-centred paradigm. The proposed algorithm, named DynLOCNeSs, detects communities by scanning and evaluating each vertex neighbourhood, which can be done independently in a parallel way. It is done by means of a preferenc… ▽ More Finding communities in evolving networks is a difficult task and raises issues different from the classic static detection case. We introduce an approach based on the recent vertex-centred paradigm. The proposed algorithm, named DynLOCNeSs, detects communities by scanning and evaluating each vertex neighbourhood, which can be done independently in a parallel way. It is done by means of a preference measure, using these preferences to handle community changes. We also introduce a new vertex neighbourhood preference measure, CWCN, more efficient than current existing ones in the considered context. Experimental results show the relevance of this measure and the ability of the proposed approach to detect classical community evolution patterns such as grow-shrink and merge-split. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Journal ref: Fifth International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, Nov 2016, Milan, Italy. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications

Fast community structure local uncovering by independent vertex-centred process

Authors: Maël Canu, Marcin Detyniecki, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Adrien Revault d'Allonnes

Abstract: This paper addresses the task of community detection and proposes a local approach based on a distributed list building, where each vertex broadcasts basic information that only depends on its degree and that of its neighbours. A decentralised external process then unveils the community structure. The relevance of the proposed method is experimentally shown on both artificial and real data. This paper addresses the task of community detection and proposes a local approach based on a distributed list building, where each vertex broadcasts basic information that only depends on its degree and that of its neighbours. A decentralised external process then unveils the community structure. The relevance of the proposed method is experimentally shown on both artificial and real data. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Aug 2015, Paris, France. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining