Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Le, T D A

A Critique of Chen's "The 2-MAXSAT Problem Can Be Solved in Polynomial Time"

Authors: Tran Duy Anh Le, Michael P. Reidy, Eliot J. Smith

Abstract: In this paper, we examine Yangjun Chen's technical report titled ``The 2-MAXSAT Problem Can Be Solved in Polynomial Time'' [Che23], which revises and expands upon their conference paper of the same name [Che22]. Chen's paper purports to build a polynomial-time algorithm for the ${\rm NP}$-complete problem 2-MAXSAT by converting a 2-CNF formula into a graph that is then searched. We show through mu… ▽ More In this paper, we examine Yangjun Chen's technical report titled ``The 2-MAXSAT Problem Can Be Solved in Polynomial Time'' [Che23], which revises and expands upon their conference paper of the same name [Che22]. Chen's paper purports to build a polynomial-time algorithm for the ${\rm NP}$-complete problem 2-MAXSAT by converting a 2-CNF formula into a graph that is then searched. We show through multiple counterexamples that Chen's proposed algorithms contain flaws, and we find that the structures they create lack properly formalized definitions. Furthermore, we elaborate on how the author fails to prove the correctness of their algorithms and how they make overgeneralizations in their time analysis of their proposed solution. Due to these issues, we conclude that Chen's technical report [Che23] and conference paper [Che22] both fail to provide a proof that ${\rm P}={\rm NP}$. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

On Czerwinski's "${\rm P} \neq {\rm NP}$ relative to a ${\rm P}$-complete oracle"

Authors: Michael C. Chavrimootoo, Tran Duy Anh Le, Michael P. Reidy, Eliot J. Smith

Abstract: In this paper, we take a closer look at Czerwinski's "${\rm P}\neq{\rm NP}$ relative to a ${\rm P}$-complete oracle" [Cze23]. There are (uncountably) infinitely-many relativized worlds where ${\rm P}$ and ${\rm NP}$ differ, and it is well-known that for any ${\rm P}$-complete problem $A$, ${\rm P}^A \neq {\rm NP}^A \iff {\rm P}\neq {\rm NP}$. The paper defines two sets ${\rm D}_{\rm P}$ and… ▽ More In this paper, we take a closer look at Czerwinski's "${\rm P}\neq{\rm NP}$ relative to a ${\rm P}$-complete oracle" [Cze23]. There are (uncountably) infinitely-many relativized worlds where ${\rm P}$ and ${\rm NP}$ differ, and it is well-known that for any ${\rm P}$-complete problem $A$, ${\rm P}^A \neq {\rm NP}^A \iff {\rm P}\neq {\rm NP}$. The paper defines two sets ${\rm D}_{\rm P}$ and ${\rm D}_{\rm NP}$ and builds the purported proof of their main theorem on the claim that an oracle Turing machine with ${\rm D}_{\rm NP}$ as its oracle and that accepts ${\rm D}_{\rm P}$ must make $Θ(2^n)$ queries to the oracle. We invalidate the latter by proving that there is an oracle Turing machine with ${\rm D}_{\rm NP}$ as its oracle that accepts ${\rm D}_{\rm P}$ and yet only makes one query to the oracle. We thus conclude that Czerwinski's paper [Cze23] fails to establish that ${\rm P} \neq {\rm NP}$. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.