-
How Do Communities of ML-Enabled Systems Smell? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Community Smells
Authors:
Giusy Annunziata,
Stefano Lambiase,
Fabio Palomba,
Gemma Catolino,
Filomena Ferrucci
Abstract:
Effective software development relies on managing both collaboration and technology, but sociotechnical challenges can harm team dynamics and increase technical debt. Although teams working on ML enabled systems are interdisciplinary, research has largely focused on technical issues, leaving their socio-technical dynamics underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by examining the prevalen…
▽ More
Effective software development relies on managing both collaboration and technology, but sociotechnical challenges can harm team dynamics and increase technical debt. Although teams working on ML enabled systems are interdisciplinary, research has largely focused on technical issues, leaving their socio-technical dynamics underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by examining the prevalence, evolution, and interrelations of community smells, in open-source ML projects. We conducted an empirical study on 188 repositories from the NICHE dataset using the CADOCS tool to identify and analyze community smells. Our analysis focused on their prevalence, interrelations, and temporal variations. We found that certain smells, such as Prima Donna Effects and Sharing Villainy, are more prevalent and fluctuate over time compared to others like Radio Silence or Organizational Skirmish. These insights might provide valuable support for ML project managers in addressing socio-technical issues and improving team coordination.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Do Prompt Patterns Affect Code Quality? A First Empirical Assessment of ChatGPT-Generated Code
Authors:
Antonio Della Porta,
Stefano Lambiase,
Fabio Palomba
Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly transformed software development, especially in code generation. However, their inconsistent performance, prone to hallucinations and quality issues, complicates program comprehension and hinders maintainability. Research indicates that prompt engineering-the practice of designing inputs to direct LLMs toward generating relevant outputs-may help address th…
▽ More
Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly transformed software development, especially in code generation. However, their inconsistent performance, prone to hallucinations and quality issues, complicates program comprehension and hinders maintainability. Research indicates that prompt engineering-the practice of designing inputs to direct LLMs toward generating relevant outputs-may help address these challenges. In this regard, researchers have introduced prompt patterns, structured templates intended to guide users in formulating their requests. However, the influence of prompt patterns on code quality has yet to be thoroughly investigated. An improved understanding of this relationship would be essential to advancing our collective knowledge on how to effectively use LLMs for code generation, thereby enhancing their understandability in contemporary software development. This paper empirically investigates the impact of prompt patterns on code quality, specifically maintainability, security, and reliability, using the Dev-GPT dataset. Results show that Zero-Shot prompting is most common, followed by Zero-Shot with Chain-of-Thought and Few-Shot. Analysis of 7583 code files across quality metrics revealed minimal issues, with Kruskal-Wallis tests indicating no significant differences among patterns, suggesting that prompt structure may not substantially impact these quality metrics in ChatGPT-assisted code generation.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Exploring Individual Factors in the Adoption of LLMs for Specific Software Engineering Tasks
Authors:
Stefano Lambiase,
Gemma Catolino,
Fabio Palomba,
Filomena Ferrucci,
Daniel Russo
Abstract:
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) is transforming software development, significantly enhancing software engineering processes. Research has explored their role within development teams, focusing on specific tasks such as artifact generation, decision-making support, and information retrieval. Despite the growing body of work on LLMs in software engineering, most studies have centered on…
▽ More
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) is transforming software development, significantly enhancing software engineering processes. Research has explored their role within development teams, focusing on specific tasks such as artifact generation, decision-making support, and information retrieval. Despite the growing body of work on LLMs in software engineering, most studies have centered on broad adoption trends, neglecting the nuanced relationship between individual cognitive and behavioral factors and their impact on task-specific adoption. While factors such as perceived effort and performance expectancy have been explored at a general level, their influence on distinct software engineering tasks remains underexamined. This gap hinders the development of tailored LLM-based systems (e.g., Generative AI Agents) that align with engineers' specific needs and limits the ability of team leaders to devise effective strategies for fostering LLM adoption in targeted workflows. This study bridges this gap by surveying N=188 software engineers to test the relationship between individual attributes related to technology adoption and LLM adoption across five key tasks, using structural equation modeling (SEM). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) was applied to characterize individual adoption behaviors. The findings reveal that task-specific adoption is influenced by distinct factors, some of which negatively impact adoption when considered in isolation, underscoring the complexity of LLM integration in software engineering. To support effective adoption, this article provides actionable recommendations, such as seamlessly integrating LLMs into existing development environments and encouraging peer-driven knowledge sharing to enhance information retrieval.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
On the Impact of 3D Visualization of Repository Metrics in Software Engineering Education
Authors:
Dario Di Dario,
Stefano Lambiase,
Fabio Palomba,
Carmine Gravino
Abstract:
Context: Software development is a complex socio-technical process requiring a deep understanding of various aspects. In order to support practitioners in understanding such a complex activity, repository process metrics, like number of pull requests and issues, emerged as crucial for evaluating CI/CD workflows and guiding informed decision-making. The research community proposed different ways to…
▽ More
Context: Software development is a complex socio-technical process requiring a deep understanding of various aspects. In order to support practitioners in understanding such a complex activity, repository process metrics, like number of pull requests and issues, emerged as crucial for evaluating CI/CD workflows and guiding informed decision-making. The research community proposed different ways to visualize these metrics to increase their impact on developers' process comprehension: VR is a promising one. Nevertheless, despite such promising results, the role of VR, especially in educational settings, has received limited research attention. Objective: This study aims to address this gap by exploring how VR-based repository metrics visualization can support the teaching of process comprehension. Method: The registered report proposes the execution of a controlled experiment where VR and non-VR approaches will be compared, with the final aim to assess whether repository metrics in VR's impact on learning experience and software process comprehension. By immersing students in an intuitive environment, this research hypothesizes that VR can foster essential analytical skills, thus preparing software engineering students more effectively for industry requirements and equipping them to navigate complex software development tasks with enhanced comprehension and critical thinking abilities.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?
Authors:
Gianmario Voria,
Stefano Lambiase,
Maria Concetta Schiavone,
Gemma Catolino,
Fabio Palomba
Abstract:
As the adoption of machine learning (ML) systems continues to grow across industries, concerns about fairness and bias in these systems have taken center stage. Fairness toolkits, designed to mitigate bias in ML models, serve as critical tools for addressing these ethical concerns. However, their adoption in the context of software development remains underexplored, especially regarding the cognit…
▽ More
As the adoption of machine learning (ML) systems continues to grow across industries, concerns about fairness and bias in these systems have taken center stage. Fairness toolkits, designed to mitigate bias in ML models, serve as critical tools for addressing these ethical concerns. However, their adoption in the context of software development remains underexplored, especially regarding the cognitive and behavioral factors driving their usage. As a deeper understanding of these factors could be pivotal in refining tool designs and promoting broader adoption, this study investigates the factors influencing the adoption of fairness toolkits from an individual perspective. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2), we examined the factors shaping the intention to adopt and actual use of fairness toolkits. Specifically, we employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze data from a survey study involving practitioners in the software industry. Our findings reveal that performance expectancy and habit are the primary drivers of fairness toolkit adoption. These insights suggest that by emphasizing the effectiveness of these tools in mitigating bias and fostering habitual use, organizations can encourage wider adoption. Practical recommendations include improving toolkit usability, integrating bias mitigation processes into routine development workflows, and providing ongoing support to ensure professionals see clear benefits from regular use.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2024; v1 submitted 18 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Motivations, Challenges, Best Practices, and Benefits for Bots and Conversational Agents in Software Engineering: A Multivocal Literature Review
Authors:
Stefano Lambiase,
Gemma Catolino,
Fabio Palomba,
Filomena Ferrucci
Abstract:
Bots are software systems designed to support users by automating a specific process, task, or activity. When such systems implement a conversational component to interact with the users, they are also known as conversational agents. Bots, particularly in their conversation-oriented version and AI-powered, have seen their adoption increase over time for software development and engineering purpose…
▽ More
Bots are software systems designed to support users by automating a specific process, task, or activity. When such systems implement a conversational component to interact with the users, they are also known as conversational agents. Bots, particularly in their conversation-oriented version and AI-powered, have seen their adoption increase over time for software development and engineering purposes. Despite their exciting potential, ulteriorly enhanced by the advent of Generative AI and Large Language Models, bots still need to be improved to develop and integrate into the development cycle since practitioners report that bots add additional challenges that may worsen rather than improve. In this work, we aim to provide a taxonomy for characterizing bots, as well as a series of challenges for their adoption for Software Engineering associated with potential mitigation strategies. To reach our objectives, we conducted a multivocal literature review, reviewing both research and practitioner's literature. Through such an approach, we hope to contribute to both researchers and practitioners by providing first, a series of future research routes to follow, second, a list of strategies to adopt for improving the use of bots for software engineering purposes, and third, enforce a technology and knowledge transfer from the research field to the practitioners one, that is one of the primary goal of multivocal literature reviews.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2025; v1 submitted 18 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Investigating the Role of Cultural Values in Adopting Large Language Models for Software Engineering
Authors:
Stefano Lambiase,
Gemma Catolino,
Fabio Palomba,
Filomena Ferrucci,
Daniel Russo
Abstract:
As a socio-technical activity, software development involves the close interconnection of people and technology. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into this process exemplifies the socio-technical nature of software development. Although LLMs influence the development process, software development remains fundamentally human-centric, necessitating an investigation of the human factor…
▽ More
As a socio-technical activity, software development involves the close interconnection of people and technology. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into this process exemplifies the socio-technical nature of software development. Although LLMs influence the development process, software development remains fundamentally human-centric, necessitating an investigation of the human factors in this adoption. Thus, with this study we explore the factors influencing the adoption of LLMs in software development, focusing on the role of professionals' cultural values. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and Hofstede's cultural dimensions, we hypothesized that cultural values moderate the relationships within the UTAUT2 framework. Using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling and data from 188 software engineers, we found that habit and performance expectancy are the primary drivers of LLM adoption, while cultural values do not significantly moderate this process. These findings suggest that, by highlighting how LLMs can boost performance and efficiency, organizations can encourage their use, no matter the cultural differences. Practical steps include offering training programs to demonstrate LLM benefits, creating a supportive environment for regular use, and continuously tracking and sharing performance improvements from using LLMs.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
