Closing the Loop: How Semantic Closure Enables Open-Ended Evolution
Authors:
Amahury J. López-Díaz,
Carlos Gershenson
Abstract:
This manuscript explores the evolutionary emergence of semantic closure -- the self-referential mechanism through which symbols actively construct and interpret their own functional contexts -- by integrating concepts from relational biology, physical biosemiotics, and ecological psychology into a unified computational enactivism framework. By extending Hofmeyr's (F, A)-systems -- a continuation o…
▽ More
This manuscript explores the evolutionary emergence of semantic closure -- the self-referential mechanism through which symbols actively construct and interpret their own functional contexts -- by integrating concepts from relational biology, physical biosemiotics, and ecological psychology into a unified computational enactivism framework. By extending Hofmeyr's (F, A)-systems -- a continuation of Rosen's (M, R)-systems -- with temporal parametrization and multiscale causality, we develop a model capable of capturing critical life properties, including autopoiesis, anticipation, and adaptation. We then establish a formal equivalence between our extended (F, A)-systems and swarms of communicating automata, resolving self-referential challenges concerning the realizability of relational models. Our stepwise model traces the evolution of semantic closure from simple reaction networks that recognize regular languages to self-replicating chemical systems with memory and anticipatory capabilities, identifying self-reference as necessary for robust self-replication and open-ended evolution. Such a computational enactivist perspective underscores the essential necessity of implementing symbol-matter transformations into computing architectures, providing a cohesive theoretical basis for a recently proposed trialectic between autopoiesis, anticipation, and adaptation to solve the problem of relevance realization. Thus, our work opens pathways to new models of computation for life, agency and cognition, offering fundamental principles underlying biological information processing.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2025; v1 submitted 5 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Temporal, structural, and functional heterogeneities extend criticality and antifragility in random Boolean networks
Authors:
Amahury Jafet López-Díaz,
Fernanda Sánchez-Puig,
Carlos Gershenson
Abstract:
Most models of complex systems have been homogeneous, i.e., all elements have the same properties (spatial, temporal, structural, functional). However, most natural systems are heterogeneous: few elements are more relevant, larger, stronger, or faster than others. In homogeneous systems, criticality -- a balance between change and stability, order and chaos -- is usually found for a very narrow re…
▽ More
Most models of complex systems have been homogeneous, i.e., all elements have the same properties (spatial, temporal, structural, functional). However, most natural systems are heterogeneous: few elements are more relevant, larger, stronger, or faster than others. In homogeneous systems, criticality -- a balance between change and stability, order and chaos -- is usually found for a very narrow region in the parameter space, close to a phase transition. Using random Boolean networks -- a general model of discrete dynamical systems -- we show that heterogeneity -- in time, structure, and function -- can broaden additively the parameter region where criticality is found. Moreover, parameter regions where antifragility is found are also increased with heterogeneity. However, maximum antifragility is found for particular parameters in homogeneous networks. Our work suggests that the "optimal" balance between homogeneity and heterogeneity is non-trivial, context-dependent, and in some cases, dynamic.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
