-
Subject islands do not reduce to construction-specific discourse function
Authors:
Mandy Cartner,
Matthew Kogan,
Nikolas Webster,
Matthew Wagers,
Ivy Sichel
Abstract:
The term islands in linguistics refers to phrases from which extracting an element results in ungrammaticality (Ross, 1967). Grammatical subjects are considered islands because extracting a sub-part of a subject results in an ill-formed sentence, despite having a clear intended meaning (e.g., "Which topic did the article about inspire you?"). The generative tradition, which views syntax as autonom…
▽ More
The term islands in linguistics refers to phrases from which extracting an element results in ungrammaticality (Ross, 1967). Grammatical subjects are considered islands because extracting a sub-part of a subject results in an ill-formed sentence, despite having a clear intended meaning (e.g., "Which topic did the article about inspire you?"). The generative tradition, which views syntax as autonomous of meaning and function, attributes this ungrammaticality to the abstract movement dependency between the wh-phrase and the subject-internal position with which it is associated for interpretation. However, research on language that emphasizes its communicative function suggests instead that syntactic constraints, including islands, can be explained based on the way different constructions package information. Accordingly, Abeillé et al. (2020) suggest that the islandhood of subjects is specific to the information structure of wh-questions, and propose that subjects are not islands for movement, but for focusing, due to their discourse-backgroundedness. This predicts that other constructions that differ in their information structure from wh-questions, but still involve movement, should not create a subject island effect. We test this prediction in three large-scale acceptability studies, using a super-additive design that singles out subject island violations, in three different constructions: wh-questions, relative clauses, and topicalization. We report evidence for a subject island effect in each construction type, despite only wh-questions introducing what Abeillé et al. (2020) call "a clash in information structure." We argue that this motivates an account of islands in terms of abstract, syntactic representations, independent of the communicative function associated with the constructions.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Face Recognition Using Synthetic Face Data
Authors:
Omer Granoviter,
Alexey Gruzdev,
Vladimir Loginov,
Max Kogan,
Orly Zvitia
Abstract:
In the field of deep learning applied to face recognition, securing large-scale, high-quality datasets is vital for attaining precise and reliable results. However, amassing significant volumes of high-quality real data faces hurdles such as time limitations, financial burdens, and privacy issues. Furthermore, prevalent datasets are often impaired by racial biases and annotation inaccuracies. In t…
▽ More
In the field of deep learning applied to face recognition, securing large-scale, high-quality datasets is vital for attaining precise and reliable results. However, amassing significant volumes of high-quality real data faces hurdles such as time limitations, financial burdens, and privacy issues. Furthermore, prevalent datasets are often impaired by racial biases and annotation inaccuracies. In this paper, we underscore the promising application of synthetic data, generated through rendering digital faces via our computer graphics pipeline, in achieving competitive results with the state-of-the-art on synthetic data across multiple benchmark datasets. By finetuning the model,we obtain results that rival those achieved when training with hundreds of thousands of real images (98.7% on LFW [1]). We further investigate the contribution of adding intra-class variance factors (e.g., makeup, accessories, haircuts) on model performance. Finally, we reveal the sensitivity of pre-trained face recognition models to alternating specific parts of the face by leveraging the granular control capability in our platform.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Knowing the Distance: Understanding the Gap Between Synthetic and Real Data For Face Parsing
Authors:
Eli Friedman,
Assaf Lehr,
Alexey Gruzdev,
Vladimir Loginov,
Max Kogan,
Moran Rubin,
Orly Zvitia
Abstract:
The use of synthetic data for training computer vision algorithms has become increasingly popular due to its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and ability to provide accurate multi-modality labels. Although recent studies have demonstrated impressive results when training networks solely on synthetic data, there remains a performance gap between synthetic and real data that is commonly attributed t…
▽ More
The use of synthetic data for training computer vision algorithms has become increasingly popular due to its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and ability to provide accurate multi-modality labels. Although recent studies have demonstrated impressive results when training networks solely on synthetic data, there remains a performance gap between synthetic and real data that is commonly attributed to lack of photorealism. The aim of this study is to investigate the gap in greater detail for the face parsing task. We differentiate between three types of gaps: distribution gap, label gap, and photorealism gap. Our findings show that the distribution gap is the largest contributor to the performance gap, accounting for over 50% of the gap. By addressing this gap and accounting for the labels gap, we demonstrate that a model trained on synthetic data achieves comparable results to one trained on a similar amount of real data. This suggests that synthetic data is a viable alternative to real data, especially when real data is limited or difficult to obtain. Our study highlights the importance of content diversity in synthetic datasets and challenges the notion that the photorealism gap is the most critical factor affecting the performance of computer vision models trained on synthetic data.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Visual navigation for airborne control of ground robots from tethered platform: creation of the first prototype
Authors:
Ilan Ehrenfeld,
Max Kogan,
Oleg Kupervasser,
Vitalii Sarychev,
Irina Volinsky,
Roman Yavich,
Bar Zangbi
Abstract:
We propose control systems for the coordination of the ground robots. We develop robot efficient coordination using the devices located on towers or a tethered aerial apparatus tracing the robots on controlled area and supervising their environment including natural and artificial markings. The simple prototype of such a system was created in the Laboratory of Applied Mathematics of Ariel Universi…
▽ More
We propose control systems for the coordination of the ground robots. We develop robot efficient coordination using the devices located on towers or a tethered aerial apparatus tracing the robots on controlled area and supervising their environment including natural and artificial markings. The simple prototype of such a system was created in the Laboratory of Applied Mathematics of Ariel University (under the supervision of Prof. Domoshnitsky Alexander) in collaboration with company TRANSIST VIDEO LLC (Skolkovo, Moscow). We plan to create much more complicated prototype using Kamin grant (Israel)
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2019; v1 submitted 16 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
