-
Generalized Assignment and Knapsack Problems in the Random-Order Model
Authors:
Max Klimm,
Martin Knaack
Abstract:
We study different online optimization problems in the random-order model. There is a finite set of bins with known capacity and a finite set of items arriving in a random order. Upon arrival of an item, its size and its value for each of the bins is revealed and it has to be decided immediately and irrevocably to which bin the item is assigned, or to not assign the item at all. In this setting, a…
▽ More
We study different online optimization problems in the random-order model. There is a finite set of bins with known capacity and a finite set of items arriving in a random order. Upon arrival of an item, its size and its value for each of the bins is revealed and it has to be decided immediately and irrevocably to which bin the item is assigned, or to not assign the item at all. In this setting, an algorithm is $α$-competitive if the total value of all items assigned to the bins is at least an $α$-fraction of the total value of an optimal assignment that knows all items beforehand. We give an algorithm that is $α$-competitive with $α= (1-\ln(2))/2 \approx 1/6.52$ improving upon the previous best algorithm with $α\approx 1/6.99$ for the generalized assignment problem and the previous best algorithm with $α\approx 1/6.65$ for the integral knapsack problem. We then study the fractional knapsack problem where we have a single bin and it is also allowed to pack items fractionally. For that case, we obtain an algorithm that is $α$-competitive with $α= 1/e \approx 1/2.71$ improving on the previous best algorithm with $α= 1/4.39$. We further show that this competitive ratio is the best-possible for deterministic algorithms in this model.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Packing a Knapsack with Items Owned by Strategic Agents
Authors:
Javier Cembrano,
Max Klimm,
Martin Knaack
Abstract:
This paper considers a scenario within the field of mechanism design without money where a mechanism designer is interested in selecting items with maximum total value under a knapsack constraint. The items, however, are controlled by strategic agents who aim to maximize the total value of their items in the knapsack. This is a natural setting, e.g., when agencies select projects for funding, comp…
▽ More
This paper considers a scenario within the field of mechanism design without money where a mechanism designer is interested in selecting items with maximum total value under a knapsack constraint. The items, however, are controlled by strategic agents who aim to maximize the total value of their items in the knapsack. This is a natural setting, e.g., when agencies select projects for funding, companies select products for sale in their shops, or hospitals schedule MRI scans for the day. A mechanism governing the packing of the knapsack is strategyproof if no agent can benefit from hiding items controlled by them to the mechanism. We are interested in mechanisms that are strategyproof and $α$-approximate in the sense that they always approximate the maximum value of the knapsack by a factor of $α\in [0,1]$. First, we give a deterministic mechanism that is $\frac{1}{3}$-approximate. For the special case where all items have unit density, we design a $\frac{1}φ$-approximate mechanism where $1/φ\approx 0.618$ is the inverse of the golden ratio. This result is tight as we show that no deterministic strategyproof mechanism with a better approximation exists. We further give randomized mechanisms with approximation guarantees of $1/2$ for the general case and $2/3$ for the case of unit densities. For both cases, no strategyproof mechanism can achieve an approximation guarantee better than $1/(5φ-7)\approx 0.917$.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Maximizing a Submodular Function with Bounded Curvature under an Unknown Knapsack Constraint
Authors:
Max Klimm,
Martin Knaack
Abstract:
This paper studies the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under an unknown knapsack constraint. A solution to this problem is a policy that decides which item to pack next based on the past packing history. The robustness factor of a policy is the worst case ratio of the solution obtained by following the policy and an optimal solution that knows the knapsack capacity. We develop…
▽ More
This paper studies the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under an unknown knapsack constraint. A solution to this problem is a policy that decides which item to pack next based on the past packing history. The robustness factor of a policy is the worst case ratio of the solution obtained by following the policy and an optimal solution that knows the knapsack capacity. We develop a policy with a robustness factor that is decreasing in the curvature $c$ of the submodular function. For the extreme cases $c=0$ corresponding to an additive objective function, it matches a previously known and best possible robustness factor of $1/2$. For the other extreme case of $c=1$ it yields a robustness factor of $\approx 0.35$ improving over the best previously known robustness factor of $\approx 0.06$.
The analysis of our policy relies on a greedy algorithm that is a slight modification of Wolsey's greedy algorithm for the submodular knapsack problem with a known knapsack constraint. We obtain tight approximation guarantees for both of these algorithms in the setting of a submodular objective function with curvature $c$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2024; v1 submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
