-
Synchronous Consensus in Partial Synchrony
Authors:
Ivan Klianev
Abstract:
We demonstrate a deterministic Byzantine consensus algorithm with synchronous operation in partial synchrony. It is naturally leaderless, tolerates any number of $ f<n/2 $ Byzantine processes with 2 rounds of exchange of originator-only signed messages, and terminates within a bounded interval of time. The algorithm is resilient to transient faults and asynchrony in a fraction of links with known…
▽ More
We demonstrate a deterministic Byzantine consensus algorithm with synchronous operation in partial synchrony. It is naturally leaderless, tolerates any number of $ f<n/2 $ Byzantine processes with 2 rounds of exchange of originator-only signed messages, and terminates within a bounded interval of time. The algorithm is resilient to transient faults and asynchrony in a fraction of links with known size per number of faulty processes. It circumvents asynchronous and faulty links with 3-hop epidemic dissemination. Key finding: the resilience to asynchrony of links and the enabled by it leaderless consensus in partial synchrony ensure algorithm operation with simultaneous validity, safety, and bounded liveness.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2024; v1 submitted 19 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Different Perspectives on FLP Impossibility
Authors:
Ivan Klianev
Abstract:
We demonstrate termination of binary consensus under the model and conditions used by Fischer, Lynch, and Patterson (FLP) to prove impossibility of binary agreement - in complete asynchrony and a possible process crash - in two steps. First, we introduce a new paradigm for consensus termination and show that impossibility of agreement is not evidence for impossibility to terminate. Next, we presen…
▽ More
We demonstrate termination of binary consensus under the model and conditions used by Fischer, Lynch, and Patterson (FLP) to prove impossibility of binary agreement - in complete asynchrony and a possible process crash - in two steps. First, we introduce a new paradigm for consensus termination and show that impossibility of agreement is not evidence for impossibility to terminate. Next, we present a consensus algorithm that ensures termination with agreement about the initial input from the processes.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2025; v1 submitted 6 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Synchronous Consensus During Incomplete Synchrony
Authors:
Ivan Klianev
Abstract:
We present an algorithm for synchronous deterministic Byzantine consensus, tolerant to links failures and links asynchrony. It cares for a class of networks with specific needs, where both safety and liveness are essential, and timely irrevocable consensus has priority over highest throughput. The algorithm operates with redundant delivery of messages via indirect paths of up to 3 hops, aims all c…
▽ More
We present an algorithm for synchronous deterministic Byzantine consensus, tolerant to links failures and links asynchrony. It cares for a class of networks with specific needs, where both safety and liveness are essential, and timely irrevocable consensus has priority over highest throughput. The algorithm operates with redundant delivery of messages via indirect paths of up to 3 hops, aims all correct processes to obtain a coherent view of the system state within a bounded time, and establishes consensus with no need of leader. Consensus involves exchange of 2*n*n*n asymmetrically authenticated messages and tolerates up to < n/2 faulty processes. We show that in a consensus system with known members: 1) The existing concepts for delivery over a fraction of links and gossip-based reliable multicast can be extended to also circumvent asynchronous links and thereby convert the reliable delivery into a reliable bounded delivery. 2) A system of synchronous processes with bounded delivery does not need a leader - all correct processes from connected majority derive and propose the same consensus value from atomically consistent individual views on system state. 3) The required for bounded delivery asymmetric authentication of messages is sufficient for safety of the consensus algorithm. Key finding: the impossibility of safety and liveness of consensus in partial synchrony is not valid in the entire space between synchrony and asynchrony. A system of synchronized synchronous processes, which communicate with asymmetrically authenticated messages over a medium susceptible to asynchrony and faults, can operate with: 1) defined tolerance to number of asynchronous and/or faulty links per number of stop-failed and/or Byzantine processes; 2) leaderless algorithm with bounded termination; and 3) conceptually ensured simultaneous safety and bounded liveness.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
