-
Repurposing Text-Generating AI into a Thought-Provoking Writing Tutor
Authors:
Tae Wook Kim,
Quan Tan
Abstract:
Text-generating AI technology has the potential to revolutionize writing education. However, current AI writing-support tools are limited to providing linear feedback to users. In this work, we demonstrate how text-generating AI can be repurposed into a thought-provoking writing tutor with the addition of recursive feedback mechanisms. Concretely, we developed a prototype AI writing-support tool c…
▽ More
Text-generating AI technology has the potential to revolutionize writing education. However, current AI writing-support tools are limited to providing linear feedback to users. In this work, we demonstrate how text-generating AI can be repurposed into a thought-provoking writing tutor with the addition of recursive feedback mechanisms. Concretely, we developed a prototype AI writing-support tool called Scraft that asks Socratic questions to users and encourages critical thinking. To explore how Scraft can aid with writing education, we conducted a preliminary study with 15 students in a university writing class. Participants expressed that Scraft's recursive feedback is helpful for improving their writing skills. However, participants also noted that Scraft's feedback is sometimes factually incorrect and lacks context. We discuss the implications of our findings and future research directions.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
When is it permissible for artificial intelligence to lie? A trust-based approach
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim,
Tong,
Lu,
Kyusong Lee,
Zhaoqi Cheng,
Yanhan Tang,
John Hooker
Abstract:
Conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) used in industry settings can be trained to closely mimic human behaviors, including lying and deception. However, lying is often a necessary part of negotiation. To address this, we develop a normative framework for when it is ethical or unethical for a conversational AI to lie to humans, based on whether there is what we call "invitation of trust" in a…
▽ More
Conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) used in industry settings can be trained to closely mimic human behaviors, including lying and deception. However, lying is often a necessary part of negotiation. To address this, we develop a normative framework for when it is ethical or unethical for a conversational AI to lie to humans, based on whether there is what we call "invitation of trust" in a particular scenario. Importantly, cultural norms play an important role in determining whether there is invitation of trust across negotiation settings, and thus an AI trained in one culture may not be generalizable to others. Moreover, individuals may have different expectations regarding the invitation of trust and propensity to lie for human vs. AI negotiators, and these expectations may vary across cultures as well. Finally, we outline how a conversational chatbot can be trained to negotiate ethically by applying autoregressive models to large dialog and negotiations datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Portfolio Optimization with 2D Relative-Attentional Gated Transformer
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim,
Matloob Khushi
Abstract:
Portfolio optimization is one of the most attentive fields that have been researched with machine learning approaches. Many researchers attempted to solve this problem using deep reinforcement learning due to its efficient inherence that can handle the property of financial markets. However, most of them can hardly be applicable to real-world trading since they ignore or extremely simplify the rea…
▽ More
Portfolio optimization is one of the most attentive fields that have been researched with machine learning approaches. Many researchers attempted to solve this problem using deep reinforcement learning due to its efficient inherence that can handle the property of financial markets. However, most of them can hardly be applicable to real-world trading since they ignore or extremely simplify the realistic constraints of transaction costs. These constraints have a significantly negative impact on portfolio profitability. In our research, a conservative level of transaction fees and slippage are considered for the realistic experiment. To enhance the performance under those constraints, we propose a novel Deterministic Policy Gradient with 2D Relative-attentional Gated Transformer (DPGRGT) model. Applying learnable relative positional embeddings for the time and assets axes, the model better understands the peculiar structure of the financial data in the portfolio optimization domain. Also, gating layers and layer reordering are employed for stable convergence of Transformers in reinforcement learning. In our experiment using U.S. stock market data of 20 years, our model outperformed baseline models and demonstrated its effectiveness.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2020;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Taking Principles Seriously: A Hybrid Approach to Value Alignment
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim,
John Hooker,
Thomas Donaldson
Abstract:
An important step in the development of value alignment (VA) systems in AI is understanding how VA can reflect valid ethical principles. We propose that designers of VA systems incorporate ethics by utilizing a hybrid approach in which both ethical reasoning and empirical observation play a role. This, we argue, avoids committing the "naturalistic fallacy," which is an attempt to derive "ought" fr…
▽ More
An important step in the development of value alignment (VA) systems in AI is understanding how VA can reflect valid ethical principles. We propose that designers of VA systems incorporate ethics by utilizing a hybrid approach in which both ethical reasoning and empirical observation play a role. This, we argue, avoids committing the "naturalistic fallacy," which is an attempt to derive "ought" from "is," and it provides a more adequate form of ethical reasoning when the fallacy is not committed. Using quantified model logic, we precisely formulate principles derived from deontological ethics and show how they imply particular "test propositions" for any given action plan in an AI rule base. The action plan is ethical only if the test proposition is empirically true, a judgment that is made on the basis of empirical VA. This permits empirical VA to integrate seamlessly with independently justified ethical principles.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Grounding Value Alignment with Ethical Principles
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim,
Thomas Donaldson,
John Hooker
Abstract:
An important step in the development of value alignment (VA) systems in AI is understanding how values can interrelate with facts. Designers of future VA systems will need to utilize a hybrid approach in which ethical reasoning and empirical observation interrelate successfully in machine behavior. In this article we identify two problems about this interrelation that have been overlooked by AI di…
▽ More
An important step in the development of value alignment (VA) systems in AI is understanding how values can interrelate with facts. Designers of future VA systems will need to utilize a hybrid approach in which ethical reasoning and empirical observation interrelate successfully in machine behavior. In this article we identify two problems about this interrelation that have been overlooked by AI discussants and designers. The first problem is that many AI designers commit inadvertently a version of what has been called by moral philosophers the "naturalistic fallacy," that is, they attempt to derive an "ought" from an "is." We illustrate when and why this occurs. The second problem is that AI designers adopt training routines that fail fully to simulate human ethical reasoning in the integration of ethical principles and facts. Using concepts of quantified modal logic, we proceed to offer an approach that promises to simulate ethical reasoning in humans by connecting ethical principles on the one hand and propositions about states of affairs on the other.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Mimetic vs Anchored Value Alignment in Artificial Intelligence
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim,
Thomas Donaldson,
John Hooker
Abstract:
"Value alignment" (VA) is considered as one of the top priorities in AI research. Much of the existing research focuses on the "A" part and not the "V" part of "value alignment." This paper corrects that neglect by emphasizing the "value" side of VA and analyzes VA from the vantage point of requirements in value theory, in particular, of avoiding the "naturalistic fallacy"--a major epistemic cavea…
▽ More
"Value alignment" (VA) is considered as one of the top priorities in AI research. Much of the existing research focuses on the "A" part and not the "V" part of "value alignment." This paper corrects that neglect by emphasizing the "value" side of VA and analyzes VA from the vantage point of requirements in value theory, in particular, of avoiding the "naturalistic fallacy"--a major epistemic caveat. The paper begins by isolating two distinct forms of VA: "mimetic" and "anchored." Then it discusses which VA approach better avoids the naturalistic fallacy. The discussion reveals stumbling blocks for VA approaches that neglect implications of the naturalistic fallacy. Such problems are more serious in mimetic VA since the mimetic process imitates human behavior that may or may not rise to the level of correct ethical behavior. Anchored VA, including hybrid VA, in contrast, holds more promise for future VA since it anchors alignment by normative concepts of intrinsic value.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the goodness criteria and the grasp-ability test
Authors:
Tae Wan Kim
Abstract:
This paper introduces the "grasp-ability test" as a "goodness" criteria by which to compare which explanation is more or less meaningful than others for users to understand the automated algorithmic data processing.
This paper introduces the "grasp-ability test" as a "goodness" criteria by which to compare which explanation is more or less meaningful than others for users to understand the automated algorithmic data processing.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Neural network an1alysis of sleep stages enables efficient diagnosis of narcolepsy
Authors:
Jens B. Stephansen,
Alexander N. Olesen,
Mads Olsen,
Aditya Ambati,
Eileen B. Leary,
Hyatt E. Moore,
Oscar Carrillo,
Ling Lin,
Fang Han,
Han Yan,
Yun L. Sun,
Yves Dauvilliers,
Sabine Scholz,
Lucie Barateau,
Birgit Hogl,
Ambra Stefani,
Seung Chul Hong,
Tae Won Kim,
Fabio Pizza,
Giuseppe Plazzi,
Stefano Vandi,
Elena Antelmi,
Dimitri Perrin,
Samuel T. Kuna,
Paula K. Schweitzer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Analysis of sleep for the diagnosis of sleep disorders such as Type-1 Narcolepsy (T1N) currently requires visual inspection of polysomnography records by trained scoring technicians. Here, we used neural networks in approximately 3,000 normal and abnormal sleep recordings to automate sleep stage scoring, producing a hypnodensity graph - a probability distribution conveying more information than cl…
▽ More
Analysis of sleep for the diagnosis of sleep disorders such as Type-1 Narcolepsy (T1N) currently requires visual inspection of polysomnography records by trained scoring technicians. Here, we used neural networks in approximately 3,000 normal and abnormal sleep recordings to automate sleep stage scoring, producing a hypnodensity graph - a probability distribution conveying more information than classical hypnograms. Accuracy of sleep stage scoring was validated in 70 subjects assessed by six scorers. The best model performed better than any individual scorer (87% versus consensus). It also reliably scores sleep down to 5 instead of 30 second scoring epochs. A T1N marker based on unusual sleep-stage overlaps achieved a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 91%, validated in independent datasets. Addition of HLA-DQB1*06:02 typing increased specificity to 99%. Our method can reduce time spent in sleep clinics and automates T1N diagnosis. It also opens the possibility of diagnosing T1N using home sleep studies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2019; v1 submitted 5 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
A Simple Balanced Search Tree with No Balance Criterion
Authors:
Tae Woo Kim
Abstract:
We present a method that maintains a balanced binary search tree without using any tree balance criterion at all, with the ultimate aim of maximum simplicity. In fact, our method is highly intuitive, and we only need to add minimal extra code and a simple partial-rebuilding algorithm to a naive binary search tree. Our method will be suitable as a highly simple and short solution when amortized log…
▽ More
We present a method that maintains a balanced binary search tree without using any tree balance criterion at all, with the ultimate aim of maximum simplicity. In fact, our method is highly intuitive, and we only need to add minimal extra code and a simple partial-rebuilding algorithm to a naive binary search tree. Our method will be suitable as a highly simple and short solution when amortized logarithmic costs are enough.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2019; v1 submitted 1 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
