-
Transdisciplinary AI Observatory -- Retrospective Analyses and Future-Oriented Contradistinctions
Authors:
Nadisha-Marie Aliman,
Leon Kester,
Roman Yampolskiy
Abstract:
In the last years, AI safety gained international recognition in the light of heterogeneous safety-critical and ethical issues that risk overshadowing the broad beneficial impacts of AI. In this context, the implementation of AI observatory endeavors represents one key research direction. This paper motivates the need for an inherently transdisciplinary AI observatory approach integrating diverse…
▽ More
In the last years, AI safety gained international recognition in the light of heterogeneous safety-critical and ethical issues that risk overshadowing the broad beneficial impacts of AI. In this context, the implementation of AI observatory endeavors represents one key research direction. This paper motivates the need for an inherently transdisciplinary AI observatory approach integrating diverse retrospective and counterfactual views. We delineate aims and limitations while providing hands-on-advice utilizing concrete practical examples. Distinguishing between unintentionally and intentionally triggered AI risks with diverse socio-psycho-technological impacts, we exemplify a retrospective descriptive analysis followed by a retrospective counterfactual risk analysis. Building on these AI observatory tools, we present near-term transdisciplinary guidelines for AI safety. As further contribution, we discuss differentiated and tailored long-term directions through the lens of two disparate modern AI safety paradigms. For simplicity, we refer to these two different paradigms with the terms artificial stupidity (AS) and eternal creativity (EC) respectively. While both AS and EC acknowledge the need for a hybrid cognitive-affective approach to AI safety and overlap with regard to many short-term considerations, they differ fundamentally in the nature of multiple envisaged long-term solution patterns. By compiling relevant underlying contradistinctions, we aim to provide future-oriented incentives for constructive dialectics in practical and theoretical AI safety research.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2020; v1 submitted 26 November, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Requisite Variety in Ethical Utility Functions for AI Value Alignment
Authors:
Nadisha-Marie Aliman,
Leon Kester
Abstract:
Being a complex subject of major importance in AI Safety research, value alignment has been studied from various perspectives in the last years. However, no final consensus on the design of ethical utility functions facilitating AI value alignment has been achieved yet. Given the urgency to identify systematic solutions, we postulate that it might be useful to start with the simple fact that for t…
▽ More
Being a complex subject of major importance in AI Safety research, value alignment has been studied from various perspectives in the last years. However, no final consensus on the design of ethical utility functions facilitating AI value alignment has been achieved yet. Given the urgency to identify systematic solutions, we postulate that it might be useful to start with the simple fact that for the utility function of an AI not to violate human ethical intuitions, it trivially has to be a model of these intuitions and reflect their variety $ - $ whereby the most accurate models pertaining to human entities being biological organisms equipped with a brain constructing concepts like moral judgements, are scientific models. Thus, in order to better assess the variety of human morality, we perform a transdisciplinary analysis applying a security mindset to the issue and summarizing variety-relevant background knowledge from neuroscience and psychology. We complement this information by linking it to augmented utilitarianism as a suitable ethical framework. Based on that, we propose first practical guidelines for the design of approximate ethical goal functions that might better capture the variety of human moral judgements. Finally, we conclude and address future possible challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Augmented Utilitarianism for AGI Safety
Authors:
Nadisha-Marie Aliman,
Leon Kester
Abstract:
In the light of ongoing progresses of research on artificial intelligent systems exhibiting a steadily increasing problem-solving ability, the identification of practicable solutions to the value alignment problem in AGI Safety is becoming a matter of urgency. In this context, one preeminent challenge that has been addressed by multiple researchers is the adequate formulation of utility functions…
▽ More
In the light of ongoing progresses of research on artificial intelligent systems exhibiting a steadily increasing problem-solving ability, the identification of practicable solutions to the value alignment problem in AGI Safety is becoming a matter of urgency. In this context, one preeminent challenge that has been addressed by multiple researchers is the adequate formulation of utility functions or equivalents reliably capturing human ethical conceptions. However, the specification of suitable utility functions harbors the risk of "perverse instantiation" for which no final consensus on responsible proactive countermeasures has been achieved so far. Amidst this background, we propose a novel socio-technological ethical framework denoted Augmented Utilitarianism which directly alleviates the perverse instantiation problem. We elaborate on how augmented by AI and more generally science and technology, it might allow a society to craft and update ethical utility functions while jointly undergoing a dynamical ethical enhancement. Further, we elucidate the need to consider embodied simulations in the design of utility functions for AGIs aligned with human values. Finally, we discuss future prospects regarding the usage of the presented scientifically grounded ethical framework and mention possible challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Distributed Time-Varying Stochastic Optimization and Utility-Based Communication
Authors:
Andrea Simonetto,
Leon Kester,
Geert Leus
Abstract:
We devise a distributed asynchronous stochastic epsilon-gradient-based algorithm to enable a network of computing and communicating nodes to solve a constrained discrete-time time-varying stochastic convex optimization problem. Each node updates its own decision variable only once every discrete time step. Under some assumptions (among which, strong convexity, Lipschitz continuity of the gradient,…
▽ More
We devise a distributed asynchronous stochastic epsilon-gradient-based algorithm to enable a network of computing and communicating nodes to solve a constrained discrete-time time-varying stochastic convex optimization problem. Each node updates its own decision variable only once every discrete time step. Under some assumptions (among which, strong convexity, Lipschitz continuity of the gradient, persistent excitation), we prove the algorithm's asymptotic convergence in expectation to an error bound whose size is related to the constant stepsize choice alpha, the variability in time of the optimization problem, and to the accuracy epsilon. Moreover, the convergence rate is linear. Then, we show how to compute locally stochastic epsilon-gradients that depend also on the time-varying noise probability density function (PDF) of the neighboring nodes, without requiring the neighbors to send such PDFs at each time step. We devise utility-based policies to allow each node to decide whether to send or not the most up-to-date PDF, which guarantee a given user-specified error level epsilon in the computation of the stochastic epsilon-gradient. Numerical simulations display the added value of the proposed approach and its relevance for estimation and control of time-varying processes and networked systems.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2014; v1 submitted 22 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
