Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy
Authors:
Davide Grossi,
Ulrike Hahn,
Michael Mäs,
Andreas Nitsche,
Jan Behrens,
Niclas Boehmer,
Markus Brill,
Ulle Endriss,
Umberto Grandi,
Adrian Haret,
Jobst Heitzig,
Nicolien Janssens,
Catholijn M. Jonker,
Marijn A. Keijzer,
Axel Kistner,
Martin Lackner,
Alexandra Lieben,
Anna Mikhaylovskaya,
Pradeep K. Murukannaiah,
Carlo Proietti,
Manon Revel,
Élise Rouméas,
Ehud Shapiro,
Gogulapati Sreedurga,
Björn Swierczek
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. We contend that if digital democracy is to meet the ambition of enabling a participatory renewal in our societies, then a comprehensive multi-methods research effort is required that could, over the years, support its development in a democratically principled, empirically and computational…
▽ More
This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. We contend that if digital democracy is to meet the ambition of enabling a participatory renewal in our societies, then a comprehensive multi-methods research effort is required that could, over the years, support its development in a democratically principled, empirically and computationally informed way. The paper is co-authored by an international and interdisciplinary team of researchers and arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on ``Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022).
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
How opinions get more extreme in an age of information abundance
Authors:
Guillaume Deffuant,
Marijn A. Keijzer,
Sven Banisch
Abstract:
We live in an age of information abundance but know little about how this influences our opinions or attitudes. A common expectation is that people consulting numerous pieces of information, well balancing the different sides of an issue, will adopt a moderate attitude about the issue. We claim that this expectation is deceitful and suggest that people tend to get extreme and dogmatic about an iss…
▽ More
We live in an age of information abundance but know little about how this influences our opinions or attitudes. A common expectation is that people consulting numerous pieces of information, well balancing the different sides of an issue, will adopt a moderate attitude about the issue. We claim that this expectation is deceitful and suggest that people tend to get extreme and dogmatic about an issue when they consult abundant unbiased information. The cause for this extremization is a hardening confirmation bias -- when their attitude gets more extreme, people get more likely to ignore information that differs from their views. Our claim is based on simulations of two fundamentally different computational models: a Bounded Confidence model and an empirically calibrated Persuasive Argument model. For both models, the attitude tends to be extreme when the computational agent consults abundant unbiased information. We analyze the extremization pathways displayed in the models and discuss how our results may affect views on polarization, and on the role of online media.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2025; v1 submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
