-
Symmetrically Fair Allocations of Indivisible Goods
Authors:
Connor Johnston,
Aleksandr M. Kazachkov
Abstract:
We consider allocating indivisible goods with provable fairness guarantees that are satisfied regardless of which bundle of items each agent receives. Symmetrical allocations of this type are known to exist for divisible resources, such as consensus splitting of a cake into parts, each having equal value for all agents, ensuring that in any allocation of the cake slices, no agent would envy anothe…
▽ More
We consider allocating indivisible goods with provable fairness guarantees that are satisfied regardless of which bundle of items each agent receives. Symmetrical allocations of this type are known to exist for divisible resources, such as consensus splitting of a cake into parts, each having equal value for all agents, ensuring that in any allocation of the cake slices, no agent would envy another. For indivisible goods, one analogous concept relaxes envy freeness to guarantee the existence of an allocation in which any bundle is worth as much as any other, up to the value of a bounded number of items from the other bundle. Previous work has studied the number of items that need to be removed. In this paper, we improve upon these bounds for the specific setting in which the number of bundles equals the number of agents.
Concretely, we develop the theory of symmetrically envy free up to one good, or symEF1, allocations. We prove that a symEF1 allocation exists if the vertices of a related graph can be partitioned (colored) into as many independent sets as there are agents. This sufficient condition always holds for two agents, and for agents that have identical, disjoint, or binary valuations. We further prove conditions under which exponentially-many distinct symEF1 allocations exist. Finally, we perform computational experiments to study the incidence of symEF1 allocations as a function of the number of agents and items when valuations are drawn uniformly at random.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Competition (ML4CO): Results and Insights
Authors:
Maxime Gasse,
Quentin Cappart,
Jonas Charfreitag,
Laurent Charlin,
Didier Chételat,
Antonia Chmiela,
Justin Dumouchelle,
Ambros Gleixner,
Aleksandr M. Kazachkov,
Elias Khalil,
Pawel Lichocki,
Andrea Lodi,
Miles Lubin,
Chris J. Maddison,
Christopher Morris,
Dimitri J. Papageorgiou,
Augustin Parjadis,
Sebastian Pokutta,
Antoine Prouvost,
Lara Scavuzzo,
Giulia Zarpellon,
Linxin Yang,
Sha Lai,
Akang Wang,
Xiaodong Luo
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Combinatorial optimization is a well-established area in operations research and computer science. Until recently, its methods have focused on solving problem instances in isolation, ignoring that they often stem from related data distributions in practice. However, recent years have seen a surge of interest in using machine learning as a new approach for solving combinatorial problems, either dir…
▽ More
Combinatorial optimization is a well-established area in operations research and computer science. Until recently, its methods have focused on solving problem instances in isolation, ignoring that they often stem from related data distributions in practice. However, recent years have seen a surge of interest in using machine learning as a new approach for solving combinatorial problems, either directly as solvers or by enhancing exact solvers. Based on this context, the ML4CO aims at improving state-of-the-art combinatorial optimization solvers by replacing key heuristic components. The competition featured three challenging tasks: finding the best feasible solution, producing the tightest optimality certificate, and giving an appropriate solver configuration. Three realistic datasets were considered: balanced item placement, workload apportionment, and maritime inventory routing. This last dataset was kept anonymous for the contestants.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2022; v1 submitted 4 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Small Representations of Big Kidney Exchange Graphs
Authors:
John P. Dickerson,
Aleksandr M. Kazachkov,
Ariel D. Procaccia,
Tuomas Sandholm
Abstract:
Kidney exchanges are organized markets where patients swap willing but incompatible donors. In the last decade, kidney exchanges grew from small and regional to large and national---and soon, international. This growth results in more lives saved, but exacerbates the empirical hardness of the $\mathcal{NP}$-complete problem of optimally matching patients to donors. State-of-the-art matching engine…
▽ More
Kidney exchanges are organized markets where patients swap willing but incompatible donors. In the last decade, kidney exchanges grew from small and regional to large and national---and soon, international. This growth results in more lives saved, but exacerbates the empirical hardness of the $\mathcal{NP}$-complete problem of optimally matching patients to donors. State-of-the-art matching engines use integer programming techniques to clear fielded kidney exchanges, but these methods must be tailored to specific models and objective functions, and may fail to scale to larger exchanges. In this paper, we observe that if the kidney exchange compatibility graph can be encoded by a constant number of patient and donor attributes, the clearing problem is solvable in polynomial time. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for losslessly shrinking the representation of an arbitrary compatibility graph. Then, using real compatibility graphs from the UNOS nationwide kidney exchange, we show how many attributes are needed to encode real compatibility graphs. The experiments show that, indeed, small numbers of attributes suffice.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2016; v1 submitted 25 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
