Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Kaposi, A

Internal parametricity, without an interval

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Yorgo Chamoun, Ambrus Kaposi, Michael Shulman

Abstract: Parametricity is a property of the syntax of type theory implying, e.g., that there is only one function having the type of the polymorphic identity function. Parametricity is usually proven externally, and does not hold internally. Internalising it is difficult because once there is a term witnessing parametricity, it also has to be parametric itself and this results in the appearance of higher d… ▽ More Parametricity is a property of the syntax of type theory implying, e.g., that there is only one function having the type of the polymorphic identity function. Parametricity is usually proven externally, and does not hold internally. Internalising it is difficult because once there is a term witnessing parametricity, it also has to be parametric itself and this results in the appearance of higher dimensional cubes. In previous theories with internal parametricity, either an explicit syntax for higher cubes is present or the theory is extended with a new sort for the interval. In this paper we present a type theory with internal parametricity which is a simple extension of Martin-Löf type theory: there are a few new type formers, term formers and equations. Geometry is not explicit in this syntax, but emergent: the new operations and equations only refer to objects up to dimension 3. We show that this theory is modelled by presheaves over the BCH cube category. Fibrancy conditions are not needed because we use span-based rather than relational parametricity. We define a gluing model for this theory implying that external parametricity and canonicity hold. The theory can be seen as a special case of a new kind of modal type theory, and it is the simplest setting in which the computational properties of higher observational type theory can be demonstrated. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

For the Metatheory of Type Theory, Internal Sconing Is Enough

Authors: Rafaël Bocquet, Ambrus Kaposi, Christian Sattler

Abstract: Metatheorems about type theories are often proven by interpreting the syntax into models constructed using categorical gluing. We propose to use only sconing (gluing along a global section functor) instead of general gluing. The sconing is performed internally to a presheaf category, and we recover the original glued model by externalization. Our method relies on constructions involving two noti… ▽ More Metatheorems about type theories are often proven by interpreting the syntax into models constructed using categorical gluing. We propose to use only sconing (gluing along a global section functor) instead of general gluing. The sconing is performed internally to a presheaf category, and we recover the original glued model by externalization. Our method relies on constructions involving two notions of models: first-order models (with explicit contexts) and higher-order models (without explicit contexts). Sconing turns a displayed higher-order model into a displayed first-order model. Using these, we derive specialized induction principles for the syntax of type theory. The input of such an induction principle is a boilerplate-free description of its motives and methods, not mentioning contexts. The output is a section with computation rules specified in the same internal language. We illustrate our framework by proofs of canonicity, normalization and syntactic parametricity for type theory. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 10 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Relative induction principles for type theories

Authors: Rafaël Bocquet, Ambrus Kaposi, Christian Sattler

Abstract: We present new induction principles for the syntax of dependent type theories, which we call relative induction principles. The result of the induction principle relative to a functor F into the syntax is stable over the codomain of F. We rely on the internal language of presheaf categories. In order to combine the internal languages of multiple presheaf categories, we use Dependent Right Adjoints… ▽ More We present new induction principles for the syntax of dependent type theories, which we call relative induction principles. The result of the induction principle relative to a functor F into the syntax is stable over the codomain of F. We rely on the internal language of presheaf categories. In order to combine the internal languages of multiple presheaf categories, we use Dependent Right Adjoints and Multimodal Type Theory. Categorical gluing is used to prove these induction principles, but it not visible in their statements, which involve a notion of model without context extensions. As example applications of these induction principles, we give short and boilerplate-free proofs of canonicity and normalization for some small type theories, and sketch proofs of other metatheoretic results. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2021; v1 submitted 23 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Large and Infinitary Quotient Inductive-Inductive Types

Authors: András Kovács, Ambrus Kaposi

Abstract: Quotient inductive-inductive types (QIITs) are generalized inductive types which allow sorts to be indexed over previously declared sorts, and allow usage of equality constructors. QIITs are especially useful for algebraic descriptions of type theories and constructive definitions of real, ordinal and surreal numbers. We develop new metatheory for large QIITs, large elimination, recursive equation… ▽ More Quotient inductive-inductive types (QIITs) are generalized inductive types which allow sorts to be indexed over previously declared sorts, and allow usage of equality constructors. QIITs are especially useful for algebraic descriptions of type theories and constructive definitions of real, ordinal and surreal numbers. We develop new metatheory for large QIITs, large elimination, recursive equations and infinitary constructors. As in prior work, we describe QIITs using a type theory where each context represents a QIIT signature. However, in our case the theory of signatures can also describe its own signature, modulo universe sizes. We bootstrap the model theory of signatures using self-description and a Church-coded notion of signature, without using complicated raw syntax or assuming an existing internal QIIT of signatures. We give semantics to described QIITs by modeling each signature as a finitely complete CwF (category with families) of algebras. Compared to the case of finitary QIITs, we additionally need to show invariance under algebra isomorphisms in the semantics. We do this by modeling signature types as isofibrations. Finally, we show by a term model construction that every QIIT is constructible from the syntax of the theory of signatures. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2020; v1 submitted 21 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

MSC Class: 03B38

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, July 2020, Pages 648-661

Shallow Embedding of Type Theory is Morally Correct

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi, András Kovács, Nicolai Kraus

Abstract: There are multiple ways to formalise the metatheory of type theory. For some purposes, it is enough to consider specific models of a type theory, but sometimes it is necessary to refer to the syntax, for example in proofs of canonicity and normalisation. One option is to embed the syntax deeply, by using inductive definitions in a proof assistant. However, in this case the handling of definitional… ▽ More There are multiple ways to formalise the metatheory of type theory. For some purposes, it is enough to consider specific models of a type theory, but sometimes it is necessary to refer to the syntax, for example in proofs of canonicity and normalisation. One option is to embed the syntax deeply, by using inductive definitions in a proof assistant. However, in this case the handling of definitional equalities becomes technically challenging. Alternatively, we can reuse conversion checking in the metatheory by shallowly embedding the object theory. In this paper, we consider the standard model of a type theoretic object theory in Agda. This model has the property that all of its equalities hold definitionally, and we can use it as a shallow embedding by building expressions from the components of this model. However, if we are to reason soundly about the syntax with this setup, we must ensure that distinguishable syntactic constructs do not become provably equal when shallowly embedded. First, we prove that shallow embedding is injective up to definitional equality, by modelling the embedding as a syntactic translation targeting the metatheory. Second, we use an implementation hiding trick to disallow illegal propositional equality proofs and constructions which do not come from the syntax. We showcase our technique with very short formalisations of canonicity and parametricity for Martin-Löf type theory. Our technique only requires features which are available in all major proof assistants based on dependent type theory. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: 36 pages, to be presented at the 13th International Conference on Mathematics of Program Construction (MPC 2019)

Signatures and Induction Principles for Higher Inductive-Inductive Types

Authors: Ambrus Kaposi, András Kovács

Abstract: Higher inductive-inductive types (HIITs) generalize inductive types of dependent type theories in two ways. On the one hand they allow the simultaneous definition of multiple sorts that can be indexed over each other. On the other hand they support equality constructors, thus generalizing higher inductive types of homotopy type theory. Examples that make use of both features are the Cauchy real nu… ▽ More Higher inductive-inductive types (HIITs) generalize inductive types of dependent type theories in two ways. On the one hand they allow the simultaneous definition of multiple sorts that can be indexed over each other. On the other hand they support equality constructors, thus generalizing higher inductive types of homotopy type theory. Examples that make use of both features are the Cauchy real numbers and the well-typed syntax of type theory where conversion rules are given as equality constructors. In this paper we propose a general definition of HIITs using a small type theory, named the theory of signatures. A context in this theory encodes a HIIT by listing the constructors. We also compute notions of induction and recursion for HIITs, by using variants of syntactic logical relation translations. Building full categorical semantics and constructing initial algebras is left for future work. The theory of HIIT signatures was formalised in Agda together with the syntactic translations. We also provide a Haskell implementation, which takes signatures as input and outputs translation results as valid Agda code. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2020; v1 submitted 1 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 16, Issue 1 (February 13, 2020) lmcs:5173

Normalisation by Evaluation for Type Theory, in Type Theory

Authors: Thorsten Altenkirch, Ambrus Kaposi

Abstract: We develop normalisation by evaluation (NBE) for dependent types based on presheaf categories. Our construction is formulated in the metalanguage of type theory using quotient inductive types. We use a typed presentation hence there are no preterms or realizers in our construction, and every construction respects the conversion relation. NBE for simple types uses a logical relation between the syn… ▽ More We develop normalisation by evaluation (NBE) for dependent types based on presheaf categories. Our construction is formulated in the metalanguage of type theory using quotient inductive types. We use a typed presentation hence there are no preterms or realizers in our construction, and every construction respects the conversion relation. NBE for simple types uses a logical relation between the syntax and the presheaf interpretation. In our construction, we merge the presheaf interpretation and the logical relation into a proof-relevant logical predicate. We prove normalisation, completeness, stability and decidability of definitional equality. Most of the constructions were formalized in Agda. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2017; v1 submitted 7 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 13, Issue 4 (October 23, 2017) lmcs:2588

Free Applicative Functors

Authors: Paolo Capriotti, Ambrus Kaposi

Abstract: Applicative functors are a generalisation of monads. Both allow the expression of effectful computations into an otherwise pure language, like Haskell. Applicative functors are to be preferred to monads when the structure of a computation is fixed a priori. That makes it possible to perform certain kinds of static analysis on applicative values. We define a notion of free applicative functor, prov… ▽ More Applicative functors are a generalisation of monads. Both allow the expression of effectful computations into an otherwise pure language, like Haskell. Applicative functors are to be preferred to monads when the structure of a computation is fixed a priori. That makes it possible to perform certain kinds of static analysis on applicative values. We define a notion of free applicative functor, prove that it satisfies the appropriate laws, and that the construction is left adjoint to a suitable forgetful functor. We show how free applicative functors can be used to implement embedded DSLs which can be statically analysed. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2014; v1 submitted 4 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: In Proceedings MSFP 2014, arXiv:1406.1534

Journal ref: EPTCS 153, 2014, pp. 2-30