Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Jimison, H B

A Perspective on Confidence and Its Use in Focusing Attention During Knowledge Acquisition

Authors: David Heckerman, Holly B. Jimison

Abstract: We present a representation of partial confidence in belief and preference that is consistent with the tenets of decision-theory. The fundamental insight underlying the representation is that if a person is not completely confident in a probability or utility assessment, additional modeling of the assessment may improve decisions to which it is relevant. We show how a traditional decision-analytic… ▽ More We present a representation of partial confidence in belief and preference that is consistent with the tenets of decision-theory. The fundamental insight underlying the representation is that if a person is not completely confident in a probability or utility assessment, additional modeling of the assessment may improve decisions to which it is relevant. We show how a traditional decision-analytic approach can be used to balance the benefits of additional modeling with associated costs. The approach can be used during knowledge acquisition to focus the attention of a knowledge engineer or expert on parts of a decision model that deserve additional refinement. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1987)

Report number: UAI-P-1987-PG-123-131

A Representation of Uncertainty to Aid Insight into Decision Models

Authors: Holly B. Jimison

Abstract: Many real world models can be characterized as weak, meaning that there is significant uncertainty in both the data input and inferences. This lack of determinism makes it especially difficult for users of computer decision aids to understand and have confidence in the models. This paper presents a representation for uncertainty and utilities that serves as a framework for graphical summary and… ▽ More Many real world models can be characterized as weak, meaning that there is significant uncertainty in both the data input and inferences. This lack of determinism makes it especially difficult for users of computer decision aids to understand and have confidence in the models. This paper presents a representation for uncertainty and utilities that serves as a framework for graphical summary and computer-generated explanation of decision models. The application described that tests the methodology is a computer decision aid designed to enhance the clinician-patient consultation process for patients with angina (chest pain due to lack of blood flow to the heart muscle). The angina model is represented as a Bayesian decision network. Additionally, the probabilities and utilities are treated as random variables with probability distributions on their range of possible values. The initial distributions represent information on all patients with anginal symptoms, and the approach allows for rapid tailoring to more patientspecific distributions. This framework provides a metric for judging the importance of each variable in the model dynamically. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1988)

Report number: UAI-P-1988-PG-189-196